Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Using human reason to interpret Scripture is risky at best, and more often a grievous error. What does Scripture tell us about the wisdom of men vs the wisdom of God?I know the answer as Im sure you do to. As we are able to reason and use our God given mental capacities yielded to the Spirit to discover this mystery. Which you indicated we shouldn't do.
I'm not sure the of the relevance of Jn 8:13 to the conversation.
In any case I think we really are reaching beyond the scope of the OP.
As I don't think any of us will be moving to the Catholic faith anytime soon.
Using human reason to interpret Scripture is risky at best, and more often a grievous error. What does Scripture tell us about the wisdom of men vs the wisdom of God?
Your stance on not starting a different thread is noted. However, the questions you raised regarding women roles, ministry, submission etc, is best informed by considering the entire corpus of Scripture. The approach to that would be to consider a biblical theology of the relationship between men and women. IMO
This would narrow the thread of the OP, which as you said is broad.
To do justice to the topic would mean to exegete the text that you consider problematic, which is the creation order, if I understood your previous posts.
The letters of Paul to a certain extent all mention this when referring to women. It would make sense to start there. Thereafter the impact of the fall, the redemption of woman in the gospels, the application of this redemption in the letters of Paul. And finally what will it be when we meet our Maker.
The thread is started here. I don't see why it needs to go elsewhere. You were encouraging Clare73 to post more. Why do that if this is the wrong place for it?I hope you do, I think it will be fruitful. I will start a thread and invite you to discuss. The prerogative is yours to respond or not. Although your indication is that you would rather do so here, which I'm not inclined to do.
I disagree here Clare we are to be good Bereans who received the word with all readiness of mind, examining and searching to verify what Paul said was true.(Acts 17:11)
Personal interpretation that deviates from Scripture is indeed a question of wisdom; in 1 Corinthians 1:20-31
'use our God given mental capacities yielded to the Spirit'
Please respect the request to Clare regarding not to engage me on this topic, its drifting into topics of wisdom.
You seemed to argue against the idea of submission of wives to husbands in general, as well as against the passage in I Timothy, so in that respect you are connecting them even by your rejection of them for the similar theme of submission.the connection with the family is reading into the issue.
Honestly, submissiveness or dominance or whatever has nothing to do with priesthood.Some women are submissive.
Some women are neutral.
Some women are dominant.
Can some of them become priests?
What is the deal with the Catholic and the Latin Mass.Conservatives should be allowed to do the Latin Mass.
Like driving a 57 Chevy; it transports one back to a simpler and (perceived) better time. Time wise, the wheels just about fell off of everything around the same time the Novus Ordo was implemented.What is the deal with the Catholic and the Latin Mass.
Grounding his command in God's unchanging creation order, Paul forbids women to be in positions of authority over men in the assembly; i.e., as pastors (2 Tim 2:12-14). You either accept his apostolic authority on the matter, or you don't.Women have their place but it's not leading the Church. I have no problem if a woman want's to lead Bible study as long as she teaches the WHOLE Bible.
Like driving a 57 Chevy; it transports one back to a simpler and (perceived) better time. Time wise, the wheels just about fell off of everything around the same time the Novus Ordo was implemented.
Catholic friends of mine from Quebec/Eastern Ontario told me that when the Mass was in Latin both English and French worshiped together in the same parish at the same time; after the introduction of the Novus Ordo, they worshiped separately. Around the same time, the separatist movement got rolling full steam and the "October Crisis" began almost driving Canada into a civil war.
Not saying the outcome would have been better if circumstances were different; but one never knows.
Mostly the novus ordo for me. But Ordinariate sometimes and TLM sometimes. I am not exclusive in that regard. I do think we lost a lot when the 1970 liturgy came along. Bugnini made a mess. Benedict wanted to repair the mess. The new rumor is that next month the TLM is to be totally banned. And that mostly because Traditiones custodes (the jailers of the tradition) made the TLM MORE popular rather than less.It is much more than nostalgia which causes our traditional friends like @chevyontheriver to attend the TLM where it is still offered.
Liberals can start up their own organizations. Wait. They have already done that.Conservatives should be allowed to do the Latin Mass.
Liberals should be allowed to have women priests.
True story; I have shared it with other Quebeckers and while not putting 2 + 2 together at the time, in hind-sight, it resulted in an ecclesial apartheid. Our country remains less unified due to the french/english divide. I recall reading a book called "Two Solitudes"; it was more pollical while capturing the spirit of the mess. The novel predated the mess by about 20 years.Mostly the novus ordo for me. But Ordinariate sometimes and TLM sometimes. I am not exclusive in that regard. I do think we lost a lot when the 1970 liturgy came along. Bugnini made a mess. Benedict wanted to repair the mess. The new rumor is that next month the TLM is to be totally banned. And that mostly because Traditiones custodes (the jailers of the tradition) made the TLM MORE popular rather than less.
When I moved to my new city four years ago the mass was for the most part shut down. One diocesan parish was open though, and it had the Latin mass. Later as the other parishes reopened and TC was out they were forced to stop the Latin mass and so they now offer it either in English or in Spanish.
I find very interesting the comment about French and English speaking Catholics united by the Latin language. Here we also see Spanish and Vietnamese and other language masses that fragment communities that would have been united using Latin.
A big vacuum that just keeps sucking others into the vortex of socialist doctrine.Liberals can start up their own organizations. Wait. They have already done that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?