Would it benefit to deem S.F a gay/queer city?

[returntosender]

Who and why, good idea or?

 

[returntosender]

I think it's a good idea. Keeps the filth and disease in one place. Gives them the privacy they want. They can run amuck and we won't have it thrown in our faces.

 

[ozso]

SF more infamous for its rampant crime, drug addicts and homelessness these days.

 

[PloverWing]

What do you mean by deeming it a gay/queer city? If you mean labelling it as a city where it's reasonably safe to be openly gay/queer, then I think that's already widely known. (There are other cities in the country that are also known as LGBTQ-safe spaces.)

If you mean something like rounding up all the LGBTQ people in the country and making them live in San Francisco, then, no, that's a bad idea. We don't need another Trail of Tears.

 

[returntosender]

What do you mean by deeming it a gay/queer city? If you mean labelling it as a city where it's reasonably safe to be openly gay/queer, then I think that's already widely known. (There are other cities in the country that are also known as LGBTQ-safe spaces.)

If you mean something like rounding up all the LGBTQ people in the country and making them live in San Francisco, then, no, that's a bad idea. We don't need another Trail of Tears.

Lol, i hadn't thought of your last paragraph.

 

[returntosender]

SF more infamous for its rampant crime, drug addicts and homelessness these days.

Maybe that's why.

 

[grasping the after wind]

AFAIK cities have no sexual preferences.

 

[dlamberth]

Who and why, good idea or?

It's just a city. Period.

 

[gaara4158]

All cities, counties, municipalities, etc. should be queer-friendly. But we don’t need to go claiming cities for specific demographics. It’s a step in the direction of apartheid or reservations. Our country should be hospitable to everyone without cordoning some people off in specific areas.

 

[gaara4158]

Maybe that's why.

It probably has more to do with the tech industry taking over major business developments, raising the cost of living out of reach for 99% of the population so people end up priced out of their homes. If they don’t have the means to move, you find them on the streets.

 

[returntosender]

All cities, counties, municipalities, etc. should be queer-friendly. But we don’t need to go claiming cities for specific demographics. It’s a step in the direction of apartheid or reservations. Our country should be hospitable to everyone without cordoning some people off in specific areas.

I disagree "hospitable to everyone". Our open borders is a disaster and it will be the downfall of this country.

 

[gaara4158]

I disagree "hospitable to everyone". Our open borders is a disaster and it will be the downfall of this country.

The free movement of goods and labor is essential to a strong economy of free individuals. Besides, our borders are more secure than they’ve ever been. Anyway, being hospitable to everyone is a good thing. You never know when you’re entertaining angels, after all.