Woodrow Wilson

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Trying to decide which president is the worst would make an interesting project. There are many contenders. Buchanan, Grant and Harding are all obvious choices.

But for my money, Woodrow Wilson was the worst. This may seem a startling statement at first blush. After all, Wilson is portrayed by historians as the great internationalist, defender of democracy and advocate for the League of Nations. He is also portrayed as a relative conservative in the midst of a progressive era.

But he was nothing of the sort. Wilson was an academic radical, a political scientist educated at Johns Hopkins and by turns president of Princeton and governor of New Jersey. His academic writings were extensive and betrayed an enthusiasm for Hegelianism and German historicist philosophy and a great impatience with natural law and its expression in the Declaration of Independence.

As a historicist, he believed that there were no eternal principles that successive generations were bound to uphold. All ideas and institutions were contingent and could be remade at will. While the nation’s framers assumed from history that people of every generation were flawed, fractious and ruled by self-interest, Wilson the progressive believed that humanity could evolve and that a constitution based on such a constrained view of human nature was flawed and should be rewritten – explicitly if possible and practically if not. Each age had its own morality and spirit, manifested in the particulars of the age – and the constitution should embody that zeitgeist.

And for Wilson the Hegelian, the ‘state’ was merely the expression of the peoples’ objective will into which individual will is absorbed. As Ronald Pestritto observes in his indispensible Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism, Hegel the political philosopher

makes clear that there can be no separation of powers in the American sense – no separation of powers in an effort to check or restrain the power of government. A separation of powers makes people suspicious of the state and sets them apart from it; it gets in the way of the state’s putting the objective will of the people into practice. All of these criticisms of social compact theory, abstract liberty, and the checking of government through the separation of powers are employed, in precisely the sames terms, by Wilson in The State, as well as other works.

For Wilson, therefore, the ‘state’ was the concrete expression of the peoples’ ‘objective will’. In his view – as in Hegel’s – the state and the people were one.

Clearly, Wilson’s notions were more Germanic than American and this same identification of the people with the state is the stuff of progressive theory – and fascism. It was his dislike of natural rights and traditional American individualism that colors both his political theory and his presidency.

But as we shall see in upcoming posts, Wilson’s views were hardly unique. Rather, they were part and parcel of the post-civil war progressive era – an era that coincided with the enthusiastic embrace by American academics of German theological, philosophical and political scholarship. And this embrace was considered the acme of academic respectability and became the foundation of a movement that intellectually revolted against the nation’s founders.

And Woodrow Wilson was helping to lead the charge.

Woodrow Wilson: The Nation’s Worst President — Behind Blue Lines
 

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Civilizations ultimately rise or fall in the realm of ideas and it’s ideas that separate humans from all other life on earth. All of us order our lives around the ideas that we embrace – even though we might do it quite unconsciously. And Woodrow Wilson was manifestly a man of ideas. And he did nothing unconsciously.

Woodrow Wilson quite consciously revolted against the ideas contained in the Declaration of Independence, specifically, the Declaration’s embodiment of natural law and inalienable rights. As a devotee of Hegel, Wilson rejected the American notion that government is the expression of individual consent and embraced the Germanic – or ‘organic’ – view of the State’s primacy into which the individual is absorbed. For Wilson, ‘limited’ government must be superseded by an expanded and efficient state power.

Like the ‘progressive’ movement generally, Wilson viewed the rejection of limited government as evolutionary and a step on the way of progress – although ‘progress’ seems to have escaped adequate definition.

As a Progressive, Wilson believed that the organic state should be efficient in a way that limited government based on separation of powers could never be. This caused Wilson the political scientist early in his career to advocate the adoption of a parliamentary system in which the separation between the executive and legislative branches would be abolished in favor of congressional primacy. For Wilson, the idea was to free the political branches from the mundane daily details of governing. These tasks should be done by a permanent civil service.

But Wilson came to see his parliamentary scheme as ultimately impractical and later advocated for a strengthened presidential power that would function in tandem with a judiciary that would insure that government was fully responsive to the spirit of the age. As Ron Pestritto observed, this change in outlook was one of means and little else. The supra-president would still devolve everyday government to a professional administrative elite.

And ‘administration’ in Wilson’s view would be above politics and not subject to its influence. This elite band would administer the day-to-day mechanics of governing according to scientific principles as part of a single, efficient system led by the president. Pestritto is correct when he describes Wilson’s system as elite government dressed up in democratic trappings.

This elite, efficient government into which individuals are absorbed and which moves forward toward a world-historical destiny is the essence of fascism. And Wilson, in common with the elites of the Progressive era, openly admired fascism. Unlike the elites, however, Wilson the president would have the power and the circumstances in which to implement his fascistic vision.

As we shall see, Wilson called it ‘War Socialism’.

Woodrow Wilson: The Nation’s Worst President II — Behind Blue Lines
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
As we’ve seen in previous posts, Woodrow Wilson was impatient both with natural law and the untidiness of a limited government of separated powers and, indeed, with the entire disheveled business of politicking itself. He was deeply influenced by the ‘dirtiness’ of the Tilden-Hayes compromise in the election of 1876 and felt at the time that politics was no longer a suitable occupation for upstanding young men.

And Wilson most certainly felt himself to be an upstanding Christian man in an age that believed that progressive humanity could finally remake even the intractable human heart. And a progressing humanity required an apolitical and more ‘scientific’ way to administer day-to-day government, which was inextricably interwoven with Congressional politicking and tainted by deal-making with the ‘special interests’.

Reduced to essentials, Wilson wanted Congress to stop exercising its legislative powers and delegate its constitutional functions to administrators who would be both professional and beyond politics. As a man who never doubted his own rectitude, he believed that similar men could be found to administer the government without fear or favor according to scientific principles.

Wilson placed a premium on expertise. Therefore, this new class would be the experts, the people with mastery over all the ‘principles and details’. Educated specialists who were possessed of insight beyond the masses and certainly beyond that of mere politicians.

And with the earnestness for which he became famous, Wilson devoted himself early on to the study of administration and in 1887 published his famous essay ‘The Science of Administration’ in Political Science Quarterly. The essay is probably his best-remembered piece of political writing and exhibits the same European influences characteristic of his thought in general.

For Wilson learned administration under the tutelage of Richard Ely at Johns Hopkins who had himself studied under European specialists such as Bluntschli at Heidelberg. And the intellectual tradition in which he studied was both Hegelian and historicist. In the ‘Study’, Wilson was quite candid about the novelty of his ideas, confessing that the science of administration ‘is a foreign science, speaking very little the language of English or American principle. . . . It has been developed by French and German professors.’

And these professors, like Hegel, viewed bureaucrats as the apolitical guardians of the public good as expressed through the organic state. To the extent that politics and administration conflicted with one another, politicians must inevitably give way to the administrators. Should public opinion intrude itself into administration, it must be accommodated ”efficiently’ without becoming ‘meddlesome’. The people’s sovereignty must be managed, in Wilson’s view, by elite leadership who thoroughly understood what ‘progress’ requires.

But the real novelty of Wilson’s ‘science’ is not administration itself but the idea that, in Ronald Pestritto’s words, administration is ‘an authority distinct from politics and outside of political control’ with the American tradition being ‘corrected by German state theory.’ As Pestritto has observed:

Wilson recognized that his proposed system was predicated on a novelty in American constitutionalism: namely, that there are legitimate state powers beyond those granted by the constitution to the political branches of government. These powers are administrative, and their exercise independent from politics requires a transformation in the traditional understanding of American institutions.

And for Wilson, as for Hegel, the educated experts populating the bureaucracy would ‘see more clearly than the people themselves the objective public will, and were to know best the administrative means necessary to achieve it.’

And who can deny that Wilson’s views have largely prevailed?

Woodrow Wilson: The Nation’s Worst President III — Behind Blue Lines
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
During the crisis of World War I, Woodrow Wilson imposed fascism on America. He called it ‘War Socialism’. And what’s happened before can happen again.

In previous installments here, here and here, we examined Woodrow Wilson’s distaste for natural law and the Declaration of Independence, his rejection of limited government and the separation of powers, his infatuation with German historicism and his desire to place government in the hands of pristine experts. For Wilson, people were not individuals but moving parts of the organic state – and Wilson most assuredly worshiped the state.

In common with much of the Progressive intelligentsia, Wilson openly admired European fascism. After all, this was a man who wrote in Chapter 3 of Constitutional Government, ‘Government is not a machine, but a living thing. It falls not under the theory of the universe, but under the theory of organic life. It is accountable to Darwin, not to Newton.’

In other words, for Wilson there were no immutable principles of government, only the needs of the moment as understood by elites who were ready to analyze, regulate and impose their will on the masses. This is the essence of fascism: elites imposing order, using crisis as pretext and cult of personality as the vehicle.

For Wilson and the elites, World War I was the crisis needed to impose a despotic order on America never seen before or since. One of the very best descriptions is found in The Great Influenza, John Barry’s account of the 1918-19 Spanish Flu pandemic. As recounted by Barry, the Wilson administration suppressed vital information that would have reduced the country’s vulnerability to the plague – all ostensibly done in the interest of prosecuting the war.

And Wilson would prosecute the war with messianic passion. In Barry’s words, Wilson believed that ‘his will and spirit were informed by the spirit and hope of a people and even of God. . . . He is probably the only American president to have held to this belief with quite such conviction, with no sign of self-doubt. It is a trait more associated with crusaders than politicians.’

To Wilson, the war was a crusade. He wanted the American people ‘to forget there ever was such a thing as tolerance.’ And he intended to wage it without mercy or quarter, stating that ‘the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into the very fiber of our national life, infecting Congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street.’

The hard line was designed to intimidate those reluctant to support the war into doing so, and to crush or eliminate those who would not. Even before entering the war, Wilson had warned Congress, “There are citizens of the United States, I blush to admit, . . . who have poured the poison of disloyalty into the very arteries of our national life. . . . Such creatures of passion, disloyalty, and anarchy must be crushed out.”

He intended to do so.

His fire informed virtually everything that happened in the country, including fashion: to save cloth, a war material—everything was a war material—designers narrowed lapels and eliminated or shrank pockets. And his fury particularly informed every act of the United States government. During the Civil War Lincoln had suspended the writ of habeas corpus, imprisoning hundreds of people. But those imprisoned presented a real threat of armed rebellion. He left unchecked extraordinarily harsh criticism. Wilson believed he had not gone far enough and told his cousin, “Thank God for Abraham Lincoln. I won’t make the mistakes that he made.”

The government compelled conformity, controlled speech in ways, frightening ways, not known in America before or since. Soon after the declaration of war, Wilson pushed the Espionage Act through a cooperative Congress, which balked only at legalizing outright press censorship—despite Wilson’s calling it “an imperative necessity.”

Wilson and his minions nevertheless censored the mail, monitored book withdrawals from the Library of Congress, asked for and got from Congress a Sedition Act more onerous than John Adams’s – and enforced it.

The Act forbade virtually all criticism of the government and one could go to prison for doing so – even if the utterance was true. The government convicted over 1,000 people for violations of the Act, in some cases for as long as 10 years. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law in three cases and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinions in each (Debs v. United States, Frohwerk v. United States and Schenck v. United States). Wilson even requested that Congress pass anti-sedition legislation after the war. Congress, however, wisely declined his request.

The Justice Department enlisted 90,000 volunteers – spies, actually – into the American Protective League, which variously persecuted the Wobblies and monitored neighborhood discipline. The league’s American Vigilance Patrol targeted ‘sedition’ and enforced rationing while ‘encouraging’ everyone to buy Liberty Bonds. Posters and advertisements constantly harangued the population and Wilson spoke often of a ‘sinister intrigue’ in America carried on by ‘agents’ and ‘dupes’.

The government inserted itself into the nation’s life by means of Executive Order 2594, which created the ‘Committee on Public Information’. The CPI zealously promoted the government’s viewpoint in the press while creating a legion of ‘four minute men’ who would deliver mini-lectures before entertainment of all kinds.

Wilson and the federal government threatened dissenters with imprisonment while taking control of virtually every aspect of the national economy, nationalizing the railroads and overseeing all means of production. Needless to say, individuality and self-determination were not encouraged:

One outgrowth of the Progressive Era, of the emergence of experts in many fields, was the conviction that an elite knew best. Typically, [Walter] Lippmann later called society “too big, too complex” for the average person to comprehend, since most citizens were “mentally children or barbarians. . . . Self-determination [is] only one of the many interests of a human personality.” Lippmann urged that self-rule be subordinated to “order,” “rights,” and “prosperity.”

Wilson stoked a frenzy and positioned himself at the center of everything.

And Wilson gave no quarter. To open a Liberty Loan drive, Wilson demanded, ‘Force! Force to the utmost! Force without stint or limit! The righteous and triumphant Force which shall make Right the law of the world, and cast every selfish dominion down in the dust.’

As we contemplate the crises of our own day and the man elected president by a bare majority, let’s all understand that what’s happened before can indeed happen again. Woodrow Wilson’s intellectual tastes and political science are those of today’s ‘progressive’ elites. And as in Wilson’s day, the elites fervently believe that they know best.

Woodrow Wilson: The Nation’s Worst President IV – War Socialism — Behind Blue Lines

Sorry for the long / multiple posts, but it is very enlightening.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
During the crisis of World War I, Woodrow Wilson imposed fascism on America. He called it ‘War Socialism’. And what’s happened before can happen again.

In previous installments here, here and here, we examined Woodrow Wilson’s distaste for natural law and the Declaration of Independence, his rejection of limited government and the separation of powers, his infatuation with German historicism and his desire to place government in the hands of pristine experts. For Wilson, people were not individuals but moving parts of the organic state – and Wilson most assuredly worshiped the state.

In common with much of the Progressive intelligentsia, Wilson openly admired European fascism. After all, this was a man who wrote in Chapter 3 of Constitutional Government, ‘Government is not a machine, but a living thing. It falls not under the theory of the universe, but under the theory of organic life. It is accountable to Darwin, not to Newton.’

In other words, for Wilson there were no immutable principles of government, only the needs of the moment as understood by elites who were ready to analyze, regulate and impose their will on the masses. This is the essence of fascism: elites imposing order, using crisis as pretext and cult of personality as the vehicle.

For Wilson and the elites, World War I was the crisis needed to impose a despotic order on America never seen before or since. One of the very best descriptions is found in The Great Influenza, John Barry’s account of the 1918-19 Spanish Flu pandemic. As recounted by Barry, the Wilson administration suppressed vital information that would have reduced the country’s vulnerability to the plague – all ostensibly done in the interest of prosecuting the war.

And Wilson would prosecute the war with messianic passion. In Barry’s words, Wilson believed that ‘his will and spirit were informed by the spirit and hope of a people and even of God. . . . He is probably the only American president to have held to this belief with quite such conviction, with no sign of self-doubt. It is a trait more associated with crusaders than politicians.’

To Wilson, the war was a crusade. He wanted the American people ‘to forget there ever was such a thing as tolerance.’ And he intended to wage it without mercy or quarter, stating that ‘the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into the very fiber of our national life, infecting Congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street.’

The hard line was designed to intimidate those reluctant to support the war into doing so, and to crush or eliminate those who would not. Even before entering the war, Wilson had warned Congress, “There are citizens of the United States, I blush to admit, . . . who have poured the poison of disloyalty into the very arteries of our national life. . . . Such creatures of passion, disloyalty, and anarchy must be crushed out.”

He intended to do so.

His fire informed virtually everything that happened in the country, including fashion: to save cloth, a war material—everything was a war material—designers narrowed lapels and eliminated or shrank pockets. And his fury particularly informed every act of the United States government. During the Civil War Lincoln had suspended the writ of habeas corpus, imprisoning hundreds of people. But those imprisoned presented a real threat of armed rebellion. He left unchecked extraordinarily harsh criticism. Wilson believed he had not gone far enough and told his cousin, “Thank God for Abraham Lincoln. I won’t make the mistakes that he made.”

The government compelled conformity, controlled speech in ways, frightening ways, not known in America before or since. Soon after the declaration of war, Wilson pushed the Espionage Act through a cooperative Congress, which balked only at legalizing outright press censorship—despite Wilson’s calling it “an imperative necessity.”

Wilson and his minions nevertheless censored the mail, monitored book withdrawals from the Library of Congress, asked for and got from Congress a Sedition Act more onerous than John Adams’s – and enforced it.

The Act forbade virtually all criticism of the government and one could go to prison for doing so – even if the utterance was true. The government convicted over 1,000 people for violations of the Act, in some cases for as long as 10 years. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law in three cases and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinions in each (Debs v. United States, Frohwerk v. United States and Schenck v. United States). Wilson even requested that Congress pass anti-sedition legislation after the war. Congress, however, wisely declined his request.

The Justice Department enlisted 90,000 volunteers – spies, actually – into the American Protective League, which variously persecuted the Wobblies and monitored neighborhood discipline. The league’s American Vigilance Patrol targeted ‘sedition’ and enforced rationing while ‘encouraging’ everyone to buy Liberty Bonds. Posters and advertisements constantly harangued the population and Wilson spoke often of a ‘sinister intrigue’ in America carried on by ‘agents’ and ‘dupes’.

The government inserted itself into the nation’s life by means of Executive Order 2594, which created the ‘Committee on Public Information’. The CPI zealously promoted the government’s viewpoint in the press while creating a legion of ‘four minute men’ who would deliver mini-lectures before entertainment of all kinds.

Wilson and the federal government threatened dissenters with imprisonment while taking control of virtually every aspect of the national economy, nationalizing the railroads and overseeing all means of production. Needless to say, individuality and self-determination were not encouraged:

One outgrowth of the Progressive Era, of the emergence of experts in many fields, was the conviction that an elite knew best. Typically, [Walter] Lippmann later called society “too big, too complex” for the average person to comprehend, since most citizens were “mentally children or barbarians. . . . Self-determination [is] only one of the many interests of a human personality.” Lippmann urged that self-rule be subordinated to “order,” “rights,” and “prosperity.”

Wilson stoked a frenzy and positioned himself at the center of everything.

And Wilson gave no quarter. To open a Liberty Loan drive, Wilson demanded, ‘Force! Force to the utmost! Force without stint or limit! The righteous and triumphant Force which shall make Right the law of the world, and cast every selfish dominion down in the dust.’

As we contemplate the crises of our own day and the man elected president by a bare majority, let’s all understand that what’s happened before can indeed happen again. Woodrow Wilson’s intellectual tastes and political science are those of today’s ‘progressive’ elites. And as in Wilson’s day, the elites fervently believe that they know best.

Woodrow Wilson: The Nation’s Worst President IV – War Socialism — Behind Blue Lines

Sorry for the long / multiple posts, but it is very enlightening.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TScott

Curmudgeon
Apr 19, 2002
3,353
161
76
Arizona
Visit site
✟11,974.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,089
17,560
Finger Lakes
✟212,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0