- Feb 20, 2007
- 6,215
- 683
- 38
- Faith
- Humanist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I know some people that are predominantly into .... researching... lesbians. LOL
Finally, as a matter of interest, is it wrong for two (or more) men, two (or more) women, or an unmarried man and woman, to touch in the same room (with one another's knowledge) without touching one another?
A Christian who says homosexuality isn't wrong is no more hypocritical than a Christian who eats prawns.
I find lesbianism to be pretty neat and gay men to be pretty discusting--but both are sinful.
The CDC reports that 40% of adult men have had anal sex with a female partner (a number born out by a similar percentage of women report having had anal sex with a man).I don't have a source right now but I read briefly once about some studies being done about it. They talked about universal human aversion to feces and evolutionary traits. Aversion to feces is a natural phenomenon and as we have witnessed the ease with which disease and infection are passed and caused by sodomy evolutionary aversion is a reasonable inference at this point.
On a serious note I think that male homosexuals are highlighted for one simple reason. Fear. It really is homophobia in men. Lesbians pose no threat because they don't want to do anything to us. If anything, that just makes us want to try harder to have sex with them. They are still women afterall, we'll want to have sex with them no matter which way they swing. That, and the possibility of a three way always exists.
Male homosexuals on the other hand could possiby want to put something up our bum. Not that many male homosexuals would want to since straight guys tend to be pretty skanky. But the possibility exists. Personally, any day in which I do not get stabbed, shot, have something up my butt or really have any foriegn object enter my body (splinters included) in any manner is considered a success.
For the straight guys out there picture this. Your standing in line when a large man gets behind you. He brushes up against you and you can feel the stubble from his chin on your neck. He puts one large hand on your hip and the other in your pocket. In a deep husky voice he whispers "Those pants would look great on my floor." If imagining that didn't make your skin crawl, then you're probabbly gay. If that had been described as a woman and she said "My girlfriend and I think you should come back to our place." you'd already have your fly halfway undone.
Yes, Cantana women getting in on is a hot turn on for me even though I think it is a sin.
I find lesbianism to be pretty neat and gay men to be pretty discusting--but both are sinful.
they are both equally discusting.
"Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire" (Jude 1:7)
I find it interesting how the gay community seems to have this "free card" when mocking christianity, creating banners mocking the last supper(Folsom street fair), yet anyone who follows the bible or is against their lifestyle is a "homophobe"..
Whos the hypocrite again??
It didnt make my skin crawl, but Im still not gay. Then again, my gay friends are famous for coming up to me, patting my bum and saying "Hey sugar."On a serious note I think that male homosexuals are highlighted for one simple reason. Fear. It really is homophobia in men. Lesbians pose no threat because they don't want to do anything to us. If anything, that just makes us want to try harder to have sex with them. They are still women afterall, we'll want to have sex with them no matter which way they swing. That, and the possibility of a three way always exists.
Male homosexuals on the other hand could possiby want to put something up our bum. Not that many male homosexuals would want to since straight guys tend to be pretty skanky. But the possibility exists. Personally, any day in which I do not get stabbed, shot, have something up my butt or really have any foriegn object enter my body (splinters included) in any manner is considered a success.
For the straight guys out there picture this. Your standing in line when a large man gets behind you. He brushes up against you and you can feel the stubble from his chin on your neck. He puts one large hand on your hip and the other in your pocket. In a deep husky voice he whispers "Those pants would look great on my floor." If imagining that didn't make your skin crawl, then you're probabbly gay. If that had been described as a woman and she said "My girlfriend and I think you should come back to our place." you'd already have your fly halfway undone.
I find it interesting how the gay community seems to have this "free card" when mocking christianity, creating banners mocking the last supper(Folsom street fair), yet anyone who follows the bible or is against their lifestyle is a "homophobe"..
Maybe it's because you can't choose not to be gay, but you can choose not to be a homophobic, self-righteous, right-wing fundamentalist Christian with no sense of humour.
You call them disgusting, they call you homophobes... sounds fair to me
because I don't justify it?
Why would I justify something that cuts people off from God's grace? I don't care if the whole world calls me a homophobe, I still will not justify sin.
Id rather seem unpleasant to someone and have them rather hear the truth, rather than seem pleasant and confirm someone in their sin.
No one's asking anyone to justify it. No one's under no obligation to have gay sex. What would be nice, though, is if right-wing Christians would leave gay people alone, and let them have their marriage rights, adoption rights &c.
Do you think that your seeming unpleasant makes the slightest bit of difference to anyone else's attitude?
It would be better for all concerned if you live and let live. Since it makes no 'positive' difference to gay people what you say about them, it seems to me that calling them sinful and their behaviour disgusting is nothing more than you scoring brownie points with the Almighty, and I'm sure he knows your mind very well. There's no need to tell everyone else about it.
If I justify someone in their sin, I am partly responsible. Because I am encouraging something. God admonished the prophets for not warning the people, and he said that if the prophets did not warn them, that their own blood would be on their shoulders.
Did you miss the part where I said that no one is asking you to justify anyone in their sin?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?