Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Wisconsin Recount
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SimplyMe" data-source="post: 75541877" data-attributes="member: 9588"><p>From what I can find, the "fraud" in these votes is that people claimed to be "home bound" to get mail in ballots and Amistad Project claims these are people that could have voted in person. Also, the fact that this is an emergency petition to the Wisconsin Supreme Court suggests they already lost the initial case and are appealing.</p><p></p><p>So, tell me Erik, if the Wisconsin Supreme Court finds these people shouldn't have claimed to be "home bound," what should the Supreme Court rule as "relief?" You can't throw out just those ballots -- they were accepted as legal and now can't be distinguished from any other vote. Beyond that, these are voters who were legal voters -- you can't even claim their intentions were illegal -- rather, the assumption would be that believed they were entitled to vote by mail because of the risks to them from COVID.</p><p></p><p>No court is going to throw out the results of a state, or even a county, over the fact that some legal voters may have broken election rules and took advantage of a voting method that they weren't supposed to. This is doubly true when there is no evidence that these votes would change the election since there is no way to know who these individuals voted for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SimplyMe, post: 75541877, member: 9588"] From what I can find, the "fraud" in these votes is that people claimed to be "home bound" to get mail in ballots and Amistad Project claims these are people that could have voted in person. Also, the fact that this is an emergency petition to the Wisconsin Supreme Court suggests they already lost the initial case and are appealing. So, tell me Erik, if the Wisconsin Supreme Court finds these people shouldn't have claimed to be "home bound," what should the Supreme Court rule as "relief?" You can't throw out just those ballots -- they were accepted as legal and now can't be distinguished from any other vote. Beyond that, these are voters who were legal voters -- you can't even claim their intentions were illegal -- rather, the assumption would be that believed they were entitled to vote by mail because of the risks to them from COVID. No court is going to throw out the results of a state, or even a county, over the fact that some legal voters may have broken election rules and took advantage of a voting method that they weren't supposed to. This is doubly true when there is no evidence that these votes would change the election since there is no way to know who these individuals voted for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Wisconsin Recount
Top
Bottom