Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Will China overthrow Darwin?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark kennedy" data-source="post: 71928837" data-attributes="member: 29337"><p>It does have a superficial resemblance to those kind of outrageous hair cuts but I doubt seriously there is any direct connection. My point here is that this is obviously a transitional but it represents the split between chimpanzees and gorillas. That's all the transitionals we have a million years before the emergence of the Homo genus. The cranial capacity would have had to have nearly tripled over night, about 2 mya. When you stop and think about what's required this goes beyond improbable and they don't get to stretch the transition over millions of years. They have painted themselves into a corner here and there is even a more devastating consequence in genomic comparisons. They have no answers for the indels, this had to happen around the same time. Sure an a occasional beneficial effect from a mutation might be reasonable but evolution on this scale doesn't happen. Which is why they have nothing to say about the 90 million base pairs that are thought to be the result of mutations. It doesn't happen in nature.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark kennedy, post: 71928837, member: 29337"] It does have a superficial resemblance to those kind of outrageous hair cuts but I doubt seriously there is any direct connection. My point here is that this is obviously a transitional but it represents the split between chimpanzees and gorillas. That's all the transitionals we have a million years before the emergence of the Homo genus. The cranial capacity would have had to have nearly tripled over night, about 2 mya. When you stop and think about what's required this goes beyond improbable and they don't get to stretch the transition over millions of years. They have painted themselves into a corner here and there is even a more devastating consequence in genomic comparisons. They have no answers for the indels, this had to happen around the same time. Sure an a occasional beneficial effect from a mutation might be reasonable but evolution on this scale doesn't happen. Which is why they have nothing to say about the 90 million base pairs that are thought to be the result of mutations. It doesn't happen in nature. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Will China overthrow Darwin?
Top
Bottom