Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Will China overthrow Darwin?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sfs" data-source="post: 71927327" data-attributes="member: 8727"><p>A healthy majority of Christian biologists disagree with you. Do you know more about biology than we do?</p><p></p><p>The ID movement generally has nothing at all to say about common descent, or even about the age of the earth. They refuse to take a position on either subject. Some of the more scientifically minded among them (e.g. Behe) accept common descent, but the movement as a whole doesn't want to offend creationists. Thus they're unsure about the most basic of factual questions (the age of the Earth), but are quite sure about a difficult question where there is little evidence.</p><p></p><p>You do realize that almost everything you've written here is (in your sense) ad hominem and a quoting of your party line, right? </p><p></p><p>If you can propose an alternative theory that predicts genetic data as well as common descent, I'm all ears. What does ID predict about the kinds of genetic differences we'll see between humans and chimpanzees, say?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sfs, post: 71927327, member: 8727"] A healthy majority of Christian biologists disagree with you. Do you know more about biology than we do? The ID movement generally has nothing at all to say about common descent, or even about the age of the earth. They refuse to take a position on either subject. Some of the more scientifically minded among them (e.g. Behe) accept common descent, but the movement as a whole doesn't want to offend creationists. Thus they're unsure about the most basic of factual questions (the age of the Earth), but are quite sure about a difficult question where there is little evidence. You do realize that almost everything you've written here is (in your sense) ad hominem and a quoting of your party line, right? If you can propose an alternative theory that predicts genetic data as well as common descent, I'm all ears. What does ID predict about the kinds of genetic differences we'll see between humans and chimpanzees, say? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Will China overthrow Darwin?
Top
Bottom