Wiki rules discussion

[Shadowseldil]

Hy everyone. With this new rule policy, I think there needs to be some sort of thread to discuss what needs to be made hard and fast rules and what should remain as recommended policy.
I just feel that there could be some serious changes afoot, and I'd like to know what everyone thinks.

 

[sampson x]

Not that this has to be taken seriously, but perhaps we should make it a requirement to have a good understanding of the players' guide written by Mega. It's a great source for what this forum generally agrees is good roleplay.

 

[Vulgivagus hagiographus]

Honestly, I wouldn’t press extremely hard what style people should write and whatnot. Trust me, I like a well written RPG as much as anyone, but I also realize that a lot of people like games that go at breakneck speed with tons of action and little heed to plot and grammar. I might not like it, but, hey, if they’re having fun, why not let ‘em? I think things like that ought to be left up to the game master. If someone wants to delegate a certain writing style, put it in the rules, and if things don’t go according to plan, adapt and improve. Isn’t that what makes RPGs RPGs?

Just a thought. By the way, there’s another thread discussing this stuff where I put some more of my serious thoughts: http://www.christianforums.com/t5712228-christian-rpg-wiki.html