Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All the angels are called sons of God. If the "trinity" includes every entity called "son of God", then the Trinity certainly includes more than three.
Good point. It may be that Yeshuah was presented as G-d's only begotten son in the context of His relationship to mankind.
Actually, it did. You need to read Eusubius who wrote approx 300 ad.1. The perceived rejection of Judaism by the early Christian church. This never happened.
Actually, it did. You need to read Eusubius who wrote approx 300 ad.
So am I. Eusubius was a church historian and he wrote very scathingly of the Jewish New Covenant believers of his day. (even though he grudgingly admitted they were doctrinally orthodox)I don't believe it did. You see, I'm referring to the body of believers that make up what the scriptures refer to as the Church of God, the body of Christ.
Who was talking about the Talmud? Besides the first version of that is the Mishnah and was published around 200 ad. The full talmuds came 2-3 centuries later. Jerusalem Talmud circa 400 ad, Babylonian Talmud circa 500 ad.We reject the Talmud or course because it's been replaced by Christ, the Holy Spirit, and the New Testament. The Tanakh still stands since this is the Law and the Prophets.
Bingo. And happy Birthday. I try to point out that there has come changes with the New Covenant, but it seems Messianic's do not want to hear it.Because without interaction atrophy and closed minded thinking take root.
So am I. Eusubius was a church historian and he wrote very scathingly of the Jewish New Covenant believers of his day. (even though he grudgingly admitted they were doctrinally orthodox)
It is possible that his writings kept the Messianic Jews of the day (called Sect of the Nazoreans) from being invited to the first Nicene council of 325 ad. they ended up being cut off from the rest of the church world for being too "Jewish," and cut off from mainstream Judaism for being too Christian.
They died out about a century later
Who was talking about the Talmud? Besides the first version of that is the Mishnah and was published around 200 ad. The full talmuds came 2-3 centuries later. Jerusalem Talmud circa 400 ad, Babylonian Talmud circa 500 ad.
How can something be "replaced" by something else that came centuries earlier?
Only in calling that "Talmud." It was referred to as the "customs of the fathers" at that point. See Acts 28.17.When I refer to the Talmud, I am referring to the Rabbinic traditions, writings, teachings that existed at the time of Christ and rejected by Jesus as the "commandments of man". Am I still showing my ignorance?
Only in calling that "Talmud." It was referred to as the "customs of the fathers" at that point. See Acts 28.17.
I would agree with this. They predate the Nicene councils and still persist in their rejection of reinterpreting pagan tradition as "holy days", instead adhering to Passover and the Festivals of Weeks.Not if you know the scripture.
I would agree with this. They predate the Nicene councils and still persist in their rejection of reinterpreting pagan tradition as "holy days", instead adhering to Passover and the Festivals of Weeks.
Talmud is like commentary for the Jews. It is a valid, scholar work of the Jewish learned religious leaders. It may not make sense to those who are mostly NT, but it has many insights that bring interesting perspectives for those who studies nothing but OT.
Yeshua never said that the Jewish people were lost.I do not doubt this. But Yeshuah Ha-mashiach (excuse my Latin transliteration) is the fulfillment of the law and the prophets. Without him, they have been given to a lost people.
Yeshua never said that the Jewish people were lost.
John 4:22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.
You answered your own question and with one word, "insecurity." Protestants have a hard time accepting anything that doesn't look, think, or act like they do. Throw in a little religious pride ("My way is correct, conform to me.") and we see why there is so much polarization.
Please to meet you, INFJ. I'm INTJ.It's because "faith alone" is the battle cry of the reformation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?