• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why WoF Didn't Work for Me in the Past

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
The Spirit filled forum is the place for non-congregational discussion. All of the "challenging" versions of what faith is by non-WOF should go neatly there. This is to eliminate any controversy.

The thing is, Bob has been very forthright about his opinions on the subject.
He doesn't hide it. I've watched it for some time. I don't agree, but I can respect that.

The only thing your "Head" can create is "Hope"/"presumption". That's why Mark 11 uses the words "And shall believe in you HEART, nothing doubting".
You often speak about WOF people being in presumption and not having faith. How do you judge that? You cannot see into the heart. If their actions somehow reflected non-corresponding actions, then you'd have a point. But it IS their corresponding actions that you take issue with. It is there believing, even before that Word is fully formed within you and harvest faith comes.

I remember Norvel Hayes stepped out of God's presence & told him to curse his daughter's growths and not doubt. It took over a month before they disappeared. All along the way he declared what God said. You might have said he was presumptous but like so many believers, just because the manifestation has not come, does not mean they're moving only in hope. And you've still got to carry on like you really do believe every step of the way. ALSO, if he let up and let doubt set in, his daughter would not have been healed, even though it WAS God's will.

I want to add this here:

And if God didn't TELL YOU by the Holy Spirit that it's yours, in terms you can understand - then it's NOT yours, no matter how vigorously you "Profess it, and PRETEND to believe. YOU CAN'T PRETEND to "Not Doubt in your heart" when you DO "Doubt".


Norvel found out about it when he stood before God, but God got on to him because it was already his privilege. It was already in the Word. He already had a revelation of the Word about the atonement.

He vigorously fought against doubt by confessing God's Word about the situation literally THOUSANDS OF TIMES.
Some people don't like that, but for wasn't going to entertain doubt. He fought the enemy about it. To listen to him, he said when he left God's presence, he could believe God for anything. But the longer he stayed in his body, the more the "natural" frequency of doubt and discord walking in your flesh sometimes brings was trying to dissuade him. There is a process to bringing what you're believing God for into fruition. Sometimes it takes time and all of the co-called "hoops" you describe, are fighting the good fight of faith. It's acknowledging God's Word and His ways. If there's a short-circuit in that process, it's usually departing from His ways.

There's more to walking in the Spirit than just believing God for His benefits, but what is uniquely what we call "WOF", is that like Abraham, you often wait for Him to bring it to pass. Abraham probably looked like an old fool changing his name at 100 years old! I'm sure someone might describe that as toxic.

Many times what God says to you is not in an apparation either. It's a breath in your spirit or a quickening that can be quite subtle. Sometimes it says, "You already have My Word on the subject." You're questioning if you really heard. As God told Norvel, the ball is in our courts so to speak. It's up to us to lay hold.

God sent apostles of faith to teach us how not to oppose what you're standing for. If you don't receive that revelation, then folks are in the "non-WOF" camp.
You can still be blessed, but there's a good chance you won't walk in the privilege Jesus paid for with His Blood. That's the advantage of being "WOF". It's straight Christianity with a strong emphasis on walking in His ways, according to the Word.

Something else about that visitation is very telling. It was God's will all along even though he didn't have the revelation on it.
"How long ar you gonna put up with those growths on your daughter's body?" God told him that he already had the authority to have them removed. It was up to him to get the revelation. The Word of God was true for him, just waiting for him to take it up and enter in.



That's the prescription for receiving healing as well as finance. Since there is more to consider about healing than believing (setting your face like flint) and not getting into doubt. There might be repentance issues as well. But God has you believing all along the way, even why He is dealing with you on other things. You might consider that toxic to actually dare to believe along the way before the harvest faith comes, but it's the Word of God.

The same goes for money. There's never a time, when you declare lack or sickness over your own life (not denying your state of being, but it's right to remain that way). That's even when you're poor.

So at what point do you decide to say WOF believers are presumptuous? Never, because you cannot read the heart. They may die along the way, they and their family still standing on the gospel. It is not our business what part of what God requires was lacking. It is surely out of order to say their are presumptuous to stand on the Word of God for your life, regardless of the final outcome.

You've got your favorite examples of those who died, but the exceptions (based on who knows what) are not the rule of example. They certainly do not represent "popular WOF". You consistently poke at "popular Wof".


I'm glad you come by, but you really can't teach and people discussing their views about what faith is is exactly that.

didaskalos
Why are all these non-Wof people in here attacking WoF teachings????
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
The question was...

I'd ask that you consider the conversation and discourse that can come between WoF members and posters who are not critical of us, but don't necessarily believe in exactly the same manner.

I'll guess we'll just have to bring it in view so their won't be any doubts.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7824694-2/#post65725802

"WOF is really just putting the Word first"

Correction: "WOF is really just putting the WoF Paradigm about the Word first".

IF IT WORKED the way it's supporters/practitioners CLAIM that it does, then there wouldn't be any discussion possible, and the world would beat a path to WoF's door (like they did in Acts 5:15).

But since it Doesn't, and WoF folks don't really live, or walk any differently that any other Christian paradigmatic group, obviously there's nothing in the "Popular version" of the teaching to take all that seriously.

Simple as that.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7824694-2/#post65725386"

How does the WOF community view apologists like Ravi Zacharias and Os Guinness?"

The typical approach would be to "Like 'em" when they AGREE with the "Precious eternal truths du jour", and "Flame them" when they disagree. WOF are no different than any other "Special interest THeological Paradigm" in that regard.

Apologetics, after all, only serves to "Prove" the theology of the particular apologist about his paradigm.

WoF, every time they employ Scriptural texts to support their beliefs are practicing "Apologetics" that reinforce their own belifs.

You can prove almost ANYTHING "apologetically".

http://www.christianforums.com/t7810831-5/#post65349503

"We know if a person will trust in what provisions the Bible has set fourth,they will live in the fullness God intended for them."

But the need still remains to explain WHY the practitioners of "Popular WoF" aren't MORE "Prosperous", "Healthy", or "Victorious" than the "Other NON-WoF churches" around them. There doesn't seem to be any discernible difference at all in the way their people Live, and prosper.

IF there were, then there would be no "Controversy" over whether WoF Practices/methodology/Theology are actually viable, or not. The wasn't any QUESTION about the Church in Acts 4 -

SO far, I've watched God Heal, Deliver, Provide for, and bless folks in my NON-WoF church environment. I've been blessed, and my salary has risen every year for the last decade without BOTHERING with WoF "Methodology".

TO me it's exceedingly simple - PS 37:5
Commit thy way unto the LORD; trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass.

No "Positive profession" no "Claiming" this or that, no presumption no "Magic words" about what God will do. Just REST in Him, and do what HE guides you into.

Simple as that. HE knows more about what's good for us than WE do.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7810831-3/#post65303348

That sometimes God chooses to heal.

True statement, and the companion to that is: "SOMETIMES" He doesn't choose to OVERTLY heal, and either takes the person home, or (as in my case) Sustains them in the condition.

It should be totally OBVIOUS to everybody that IF "WoF claims" were true, then there'd be NO Discussion. They'd all be "Healed" (and if they WEREN'T it'd be THEIR FAULT).

But the simple fact is that a person is NO MORE LIKELY to experience ACTUAL "Physical Healing", or ACTUAL "Prosperity" in a "WoF oriented congregation", than they are in the local Baptist, or United Church of Christ. And no LESS likely either.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7807590-3/#post65193339

"revelation comes through the Holy Spirit speaking to our inner witness from the word."

SO AGAIN, as I said to begin with "Faith" is a REVELATION.

And Popular/TOXIC WoF tries to get folks WHO DON"T HAVE the inner witness - to act as though they do - i.e. Act presumptively.

Simple as that.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7807590/#post65162950

"In other words, I interpret this to mean that the "Word of Faith" movement is about personal revelation. Revelation = God shows you personally somehow."

Unfortunately NOT

The "Popular WoF Movement" is about pretending to believe what you really don't necessarily believe, and "Acting as though you did" consistently.

BIBLICAL WoF (like salvation) is when one believes what God HAS SAID to him, and puts his trust in THAT. The Written Word IS the Word of God, but NOT NECESSARILY YOURS NOW just because you want it to be.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7809116/#post65155715

Are YOU seeking to jump through God's hoops that HE sets before you, or do YOU want Him to jump through yours instead???

There's a BIBLICAL WoF - that starts by taking HIS Yoke upon you, and learning of HIM.

And a TOXIC WoF where one tries to learn methods, and rituals, whereby they can get God to do what THEY want him to.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7807590/#post65139260

The TRICK to this is the CONDITIONAL STATEMENT: "and shall not doubt in his heart,"

It's another way of Saying "Has Faith". "FAITH" isn't "Intellectual assent" to a Biblical promise. It's the ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE in God, that the PROMISE is YOURS. And if God didn't TELL YOU by the Holy Spirit that it's yours, in terms you can understand - then it's NOT yours, no matter how vigorously you "Profess it, and PRETEND to believe. YOU CAN'T PRETEND to "Not Doubt in your heart" when you DO "Doubt".

Simple as that.

"What if God says it, but you struggle to believe it, is it still true for you ?"

If you don't believe what God SAYS (in terms you can understand),then there's NO FAITH, and nothing to build a "Claim" on.

When you became a CHRISTIAN, The Holy Spirit bore witness with YOUR spirit that you had become a child of God, and as a result, you proclaim to other WITHOUT DOUBT that you're saved.

"Popular WoF" often teaches folks to PRETEND they have faith - which only gets REALLY DANGEROUS when physical HEALING is involved. "BIBLICAL Faith" is always a revelation FROM HIM to you. It was for Hagin in the beginning.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7790858-3/#post64801223

"However, can all healings be claimed to be based on gifts or a specific revelation?"

Of course not.

"FAITH" is revelatory (no other way to believe in your HEART without doubt).

But the simple FACT about healings in Churches, is that in MOST CASES "Faith" isn't anywhere in sight, and the healings are PRAYED FOR IN HOPE as prayers of petition - that God will HEAL the sick - without any real knowledge of whether HE will or not in specific cases.

MOST Miraculous healings come as a happy surprise to everybody concerned.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7790858-3/#post64799787

"Is there a difference between a gift of healing which porducess an answer in this world within 48 hours or so. And just normal faith that may take 6 months?"

Obviously there is. Is there ANY "Faith" that isn't "normal Faith" for a Christian??

Note - in MOST healings that occur in churches, "Faith" doesn't appear to be a issue one way or another. MOST Prayers for healing are "Prayers of Petition" offered in HOPE, to God who is KNOWN to heal according to His will.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7753776-24/#post64794385

"Because I have to discern your rue goldberg understanding of Faith."

It's RUBE Goldberg, y'all!!

And I realize that popular WoF teaching has to have Job be the helpless victim of his own fear, and all poor God - powerless, and denied entrance into his creation, could do was stand by wringing his hands while satan beats up on His helpless prey.

But that's not what the Word says, of course. It's just "WoF Theology".

You might want to consider that God IS, Always HAS BEEN, and always WILL BE "Sovereign", and that ALL AUTHORITY dwells in HIM - and HE HAS NEVER been the Helpless Deity that Cope, and others think He is.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7790858-2/#post64794236

"God's Word will not profit people unless they mix it with faith."

the ISSUE here, however, is that "FAITH" is revelatory. Only through the ministry of the Holy Spirit can we "See" with the eyes of faith. TOXIC WoF trains people to "PRETEND TO HAVE FAITH" - when all they actually have is "Intellectual assent".

http://www.christianforums.com/t7790858-2/#post64785419

"why do prominent WOF preachers and teachers not get healed despite their powerful teaching and practice of faith?"

"Prominent WoF Preachers" aren't any different than anybody else, and "Theology", "Professions", Proof texts, and WoF Beliefs/methods HEALS NOBODY.

If someone is Healed, God, through HIS power did it, IN HIS TIME, according to his specific WILL in the situation, and in the way that He chooses.

And if there are "Issues" - it's up to HIM to clear up the "Issues" (just like he did with Job). God started the process, and WHEN the process reached it's Goal in Job's life - then there was healing and restoration for everybody involved.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7753776-22/#post64569495

"It is the gospel according to me,and when its not working start pointing."

ANd if it's the gospel according to popular WoF - if it DOESN"T WORK - then it' YOUR FAULT for not following the formula correctly.

"If Word of Faith is so bad,why listen?"

There's a Biblical Word of Faith which I do pay attention to, and a "Hollywood TOXIC" word of faith generally found on TV that I just surf on past.

"It is unreal that a teaching that promotes faith in God,is criticized."

Except that it DOESN'T promote "Faith" at all, but teaches pretense, and Presumption, which brings only guilt and disappointment (and can kill you if physical issues are involved).

http://www.christianforums.com/t7753776-21/#post64559003

"So why do we hammer out these endless debates?"

Simple - WoF makes ALL SORTS of Claims about itself, which NON-WoF Doesn't find at ALL convincing, and in SOME cases heretical. And, of course there's no OVERT evidence that their "Claims" even work.

"So let every man be accountable for his heart,and lets have,kindness and fellowship for a change."

As long as we Non-Popular WoF shut up and don't express our opinions, of course.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7783471-3/#post64444021

Contradiction in terms, If your "Mind" doesn't KNOW - then you have no "Substance, or Evidence", and you're not "speaking FAITH" at all - just parroting "Mantras" - it's called "Presumption". ANd when the "Mountain" DOESN'T move, then it's all YOUR FAULT for not maintaining a "Right profession" consistently enough. This is the very HEART of "TOXIC Wof False teaching.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7753776-16/#post64112095


But let's FACE IT - "Proclaiming" stuff is what popular WoF TEACHES one to do (whether they have any "Faith" or not - so it kind of followes.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7753776-16/#post64111455

"you could have avoided all this pain, suffering, and financial hardship"

And THIS, of course is the "Standard Word of Faith disclaimer".

If it doesn't work for you - IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT!!!!

http://www.christianforums.com/t7753776-16/#post64105830

Of course if a "wof congregation" is living in "Divine health", why would Cope be AFRAID that an innoculation WOULD CAUSE a sickness that the Lord is "protecting" to people against???

If there's no such thing as "Divine health" - then why bother with "Wof" at all??

http://www.christianforums.com/t7770510/#post64073828

SO it's up to YOU to figure out how you can: "not doubt in your heart" when you know you have doubt, and "believe that those things which you Say shall come to pass" when you really have no idea whether they will, or not.

Simple as that.

I don't really see that we're really all that close on the understanding of faith. There's no requirement to see eye to eye on doctrines of faith, but it shouldn't really be expressed here.
 
Upvote 0

ABlessedAnomaly

Teacher of the Word
Apr 28, 2006
2,840
263
Arizona
✟33,962.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
I don't really see that we're really all that close on the understanding of faith. There's no requirement to see eye to eye on doctrines of faith, but it shouldn't really be expressed here.

The quotes from Bob didn't come through, so readers will have to look backward to see them.

I read through these purposefully, to see what you see. Some, I will agree, would be inflammatory in our forum. These weren't made in our forum, though. Could he keep his language about what he thinks works and doesn't to an agreeable tone? I don't know. Would he take a step back if we pointed out oversteps? I think so. He's a decent man from what I can tell.

Looking at the quotes you post from him I'll make the readers aware that Bob does teach the Word of Faith. He also points out what he feels is TOXIC WoF. His distinction is quite apparent and quite real. Some people who have practiced TOXIC WoF have died. Their presumptuous faith did not help them.

Note: this does NOTHING to take away from the TRUTH of true WoF. And he says this repeatedly. I've pulled over a post to start a new thread on just what WoF is and teaches. It will be telling: are we following a TRUE gospel based Word of Faith message, or has it become something else, something that used wrongly will leave you hurt badly?
 
Upvote 0

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
He's a decent man from what I can tell

It's not about being a good or bad man. Any can come into the WOF congregation and learn and inquire about WOF, the gospel, etc. That's not what takes place though.

It's not about "putting Bob to nought". I'm not rejecting Bob. But he is not a member of this congregation, so he's pretty limited in what he can say here. He can say anything he wants in places like the Spirit Filled section. I go there all of the time. It's not a congregation, so their are no restrictions.

...I'll make the readers aware that Bob does teach the Word of Faith.

...obviously there's nothing in the "Popular version" of the teaching to take all that seriously.
I've been blessed, and my salary has risen every year for the last decade without BOTHERING with WoF "Methodology".
(We're talking about "bothering" to be a do'er of the Word.)

...But the simple fact is that a person is NO MORE LIKELY to experience ACTUAL "Physical Healing", or ACTUAL "Prosperity" in a "WoF oriented congregation",
TOXIC WoF tries to get folks WHO DON"T HAVE the inner witness - to act as though they do -
Make no mistake about it. He does believe most of us espouse "toxic WOF". Just how do you know they "don't have the inner witness"?

The "Popular WoF Movement" is about pretending to believe what you really don't necessarily believe,
The Written Word IS the Word of God, but NOT NECESSARILY YOURS NOW just because you want it to be.
The Norvel Hayes examples demonstrates how you can lay down your authority over disease by not laying hold on it.
And a TOXIC WoF where one tries to learn methods, and rituals,...
This is exactly how non-WOF believers view WOF. You can add "toxic" to it, but when you look at principles of God's Word as a "ritual" or a "formula" to enact, minus actually following Jesus, and walking in His ways... that is deceived.

It's the ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE in God, that the PROMISE is YOURS.
The thing is, the "day dawns" on our spirits. The revelation often comes a little at a time, but we're to receive it NOW like it is so. We're to rise up and believe NOW, even though we don't have a a full authoritative image in our spirits.

People do need instruction on how to act along the way and not toss their medications while they are awaiting their harvest. But that is what you'd preach, not Hobart Freeman and who died while they dared to believe God. People do perish for lack of knowledge. But pointing to people in the gutter seems to suggest it invalidates the faith message.

"Popular WoF" often teaches folks to PRETEND they have faith
Not even close. We're told by Jesus to believe. In fact, we're to believe and not doubt, even before faith comes. Not doubting means you come against that in our thoughts, words, and actions. You actually "incubate" the seed of the Word inside you. You're "expecting".

The whole "seed faith" thing is very WOF. It acknowledges that the everything you need is already in the seed. It will reproduce the image of what it is without a lot of effort. You steward the growing conditions. We believe in the promise even before the harvest. It's not make believe, but that's the accusation. It's "toxic".

There is a lot of other things to consider as to why your garden is in the state it is in. That is why you don't always get a harvest. You don't accuse the farmer of obeying his Lord, by holding fast his belief in the promise. It's not make-believe. That's what the world says. As you know, not everyone gets this.

Another important thing he has not agreed with is the importance of always being filled.
That's a vital part of abiding. I didn't locate that quote, as most of the quotes I took were about threads validating or dissing WOF.

He also points out what he feels is TOXIC WoF.

That is the more bizarre things to point out. When you talk about what WOF supposedly is (to others inquiring about it on other threads), and you persistently point to bad examples, what does that really have to do with WOF? It's like putting some kind of scarlet letter on it.

It will be telling: are we following a TRUE gospel based Word of Faith message, or has it become something else, something that used wrongly will leave you hurt badly?

That sounds like something we would have read in the non-WOF section. I don't agree with everyone's money doctrine. People point out to 30-60-100 fold return thing. I haven't heard that spoken of in years. Really, since the Midas Touch came out, a lot of what people like to cite to object to WOF is much more rarer. They respect Kenneth Hagin (as I do).

People like to point to "You don't have enough faith", and frankly, I don't even remember the last time I heard that (when it wasn't cited by someone objecting to WOF). I think people stick that in their bag of stones to throw when discussing WOF.

I try not to dwell on what's wrong in church. I look for what's right. I want to hear from the ones that made it, not the ones that didn't. The whole "toxic" thing points to failure, excess, and imbalance. It's not at all what we think of as WOF. It isn't in the least bit edifying and is a slight to the "movement".

It's obvious everyone has made mistakes and probably most are still learning the lessons of the manna. But even in the desert, God's people were told to believe the report of God and become established in His testimonies. To live by every Word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.

Some people think there isn't a difference walking in principles of faith (as per WOF), but it is something you "build" within you. When you're strong in it, it affects your life. You're more victorious. It's something you have to steward as well, since you can have the Word stolen from you through deception.

I'd rather receive the promise as if it were mine and experience difficulty bringing it to birth, than not believing it at all and missing out on some part of my inheritance.

What goes in us is what comes out of us. We're supposed to keep our eyes Heavenward and not at those who are out of balance. It plants a subtle hint of doubt to "consider" honoring God's Word (before your harvest) as "make believe".

Personally, I think WOF churches are stronger than ever. Many don't wear the tag "WOF", but basically preach it because it is the Word of God. It's been incorporated into many churches. I think great things are ahead.
 
Upvote 0

ABlessedAnomaly

Teacher of the Word
Apr 28, 2006
2,840
263
Arizona
✟33,962.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
I think some of your post is us passing each other by. I'm not saying that Bob is preaching Word of Faith at all times. He understands it, and at times preaches it well. He doesn't embrace it well, especially in the area of his heart health. That's his to grow into.

And yes, some of his comments are simply wrong. But that is where correction and edification come in. If he attacks us, then I'd agree that it has no place here. But he is not attacking; he is simply presenting what he has seen and experienced. Some of which is accurate but we in WoF simply don't want to hear it. Sorry, but if truth be preached....

(We're talking about "bothering" to be a do'er of the Word.)
So is he. This is what he means by "presumptuous faith." Those who intellectually THINK they are being faithful, but have no real faith, are not do'ers of the Word and they will see no results from it. The Word promises that.

Make no mistake about it. He does believe most of us espouse "toxic WOF". Just how do you know they "don't have the inner witness"?
Hmm. Perhaps. Perhaps not. He teaches Mark 11:24 correctly. When he speaks of "toxic" he talks of people and teachers who don't really have the faith to back it up. The "toxic" nature is that when people have a "false faith" then results will not be seen. And that can be deadly.

This is exactly how non-WOF believers view WOF. You can add "toxic" to it, but when you look at principles of God's Word as a "ritual" or a "formula" to enact, minus actually following Jesus, and walking in His ways... that is deceived.
Um, that's his point.

Not even close. We're told by Jesus to believe. In fact, we're to believe and not doubt, even before faith comes. Not doubting means you come against that in our thoughts, words, and actions.
Agreed.

You actually "incubate" the seed of the Word inside you. You're "expecting".

The whole "seed faith" thing is very WOF. It acknowledges that the everything you need is already in the seed. It will reproduce the image of what it is without a lot of effort. You steward the growing conditions. We believe in the promise even before the harvest. It's not make believe, but that's the accusation. It's "toxic".
Well, when seed is mentioned in scripture it is about the Word being sown into a person's heart.

Further this concept of "incubating" the seed for a healing? Where did Jesus ever heal through an "incubation" period. All of his healings were done on the spot. There was one where the blind man had to go do something -- and exercise of his faith -- before the healing manifested. But all of Jesus' healings were done immediately.

There is a lot of other things to consider as to why your garden is in the state it is in. That is why you don't always get a harvest. You don't accuse the farmer of obeying his Lord, by holding fast his belief in the promise. It's not make-believe. That's what the world says. As you know, not everyone gets this.
Amen.

Another important thing he has not agreed with is the importance of always being filled. That's a vital part of abiding. I didn't locate that quote, as most of the quotes I took were about threads validating or dissing WOF.
Again, I'm not saying he teaches all things correctly. I'm saying that he is not overtly attacking us. This is where correction and exhortation come in.

That sounds like something we would have read in the non-WOF section. I don't agree with everyone's money doctrine. People point out to 30-60-100 fold return thing. I haven't heard that spoken of in years. Really, since the Midas Touch came out, a lot of what people like to cite to object to WOF is much more rarer. They respect Kenneth Hagin (as I do).
You haven't been watching Christian TV then. I've heard the 30-60-100 message all the time (usually on the telethons where money is the central theme). On the positive side I heard Fred K.C. Price preach a message on this in person. The gist of it was that believing in a 100 fold return on your giving is error. He said that if it worked that way then he'd just "invest" a thousand dollars and expect his 100 fold; then when he got it he'd "reinvest" his $100,000 for another 100 fold return. Soon he'd be a gazillionaire. Last I checked, Fred K.C. Price is Word of Faith and here he is teaching AGAINST the 30-60-100 fold return. He'd better stay out of this forum, huh (tongue in cheek!!).

People like to point to "You don't have enough faith", and frankly, I don't even remember the last time I heard that (when it wasn't cited by someone objecting to WOF). I think people stick that in their bag of stones to throw when discussing WOF.
Well, that would have been the last time I saw Gloria doing healing school on TV. She doesn't exactly say "you don't have enough faith" but the "blame" is still on the one who did not get the results.

But the truth be told, when someone doesn't get results, according to the Word, it is because "they don't have enough faith!!" This much is true. Jesus often said to His disciples: "Oh, ye of little faith" when they were not producing results.

I try not to dwell on what's wrong in church. I look for what's right. I want to hear from the ones that made it, not the ones that didn't. The whole "toxic" thing points to failure, excess, and imbalance. It's not at all what we think of as WOF. It isn't in the least bit edifying and is a slight to the "movement".

I'd have to disagree. If we simply live in edification and have no correction then not only are we contrary to biblical teaching, but we will have a lot of people who will fall into a rut because they have never been taught about ruts.

Some people think there isn't a difference walking in principles of faith (as per WOF), but it is something you "build" within you. When you're strong in it, it affects your life. You're more victorious. It's something you have to steward as well, since you can have the Word stolen from you through deception.

I'd rather receive the promise as if it were mine and experience difficulty bringing it to birth, than not believing it at all and missing out on some part of my inheritance.
Amen to all that.

What goes in us is what comes out of us. We're supposed to keep our eyes Heavenward and not at those who are out of balance. It plants a subtle hint of doubt to "consider" honoring God's Word (before your harvest) as "make believe".
"keeping our eyes heavenward" sounds placid, inactive.

We are to go into the fields and prepare for the harvest. We are to teach people truth. We are to correct people who are wrong. We are to engage and correct. We are to be violent and take the kingdom by force. Get out there and cause a ruckus to get people to understand the Gospel message.

Personally, I think WOF churches are stronger than ever. Many don't wear the tag "WOF", but basically preach it because it is the Word of God. It's been incorporated into many churches. I think great things are ahead.

I agree here. Praise God!!
 
Upvote 0

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Further this concept of "incubating" the seed for a healing? Where did Jesus ever heal through an "incubation" period. All of his healings were done on the spot. There was one where the blind man had to go do something -- and exercise of his faith -- before the healing manifested. But all of Jesus' healings were done immediately.

It seems that it's easier to believe Jesus when we see Him and watch Him perform thousands of miracles. Imagine that!
You know it would be. Also, He paid the price all through His life. His prayer life was unmatched. There was no deviation from the plan in His words or actions. His anointing was always stirred up. So on His end, He and God did everything possible to bless mankind. On our end, somehow over the centuries we've had to relearn to trust God. The church began to specialize in protecting itself through carnal means and weapons. He's been working on us to trust and believe Him. Still, we have to learn that and it takes relationship to establish that.

And he said, So is the kingdom of God, as if a man should cast seed into the ground; 27 And should sleep, and rise night and day, and the seed should spring and grow up, he knoweth not how. 28 For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself; first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the ear. 29 But when the fruit is brought forth, immediately he putteth in the sickle, because the harvest is come.
Mark 4:26-29

You can plant the seed of the Word in you and if you keep your heart (maintain growing conditions). Over time, you'll carry that word in you like a baby. You'll even sense the delivery period and then when the time comes, you give birth! Faith comes! At that point, it's already already yours, but the manifestation may take a little while. It might be "while they were on the way", or "that same hour".

Read Charles Capps "Seedtime and Harvest". There's a wonderful prophecy in it that explains it well. Charles has sold millions of those little books and it shows you how you can plant the seed for your promise with your faith in God's seed (promise. That's without ANY harvest faith. You dare to believe when you palnt the seed. The faith really is in God. It's not "hoops" and "methodology" to KEEP BELIEVING even though you don't have the "It's mine now" kind of faith that Bob talks about.

I know Bob doesn't have the revelation of that (yet), and he's been openly critical of those who stand believing without it. Obviously I can forgive him for it, but it's that kind of criticism that doesn't belong in the WOF section. Anyone might just say the wrong thing sometimes, but it's a position he's held for years. And as it has been said, 'He's no hypocrite." He's open. It's distasteful to me (as it likely is to him) to lay all that out as I have. But I could see some of the same (however restrained) in some of those recent posts. I realize that when you compare those who are waiting with those who are in presumption, and yet still talking the talk, that they both appear to be doing the same things. (At least talking the same talk.) When you keep pointing to those people, it makes those standing, believing look like holy fools.

This is not a new thing by a long shot! You'll take more flack from the Body of Christ for doing this, but you have to accept that -- but not here.
I'm not saying that Bob is preaching Word of Faith at all times. He understands it, and at times preaches it well.

I hear what he says about Mark 11:23, but there's more to what WOF is about than that verse. It's about believing in God's Word, even while you're still building faith (for what you desire). It's those voices of criticism so common in other parts of the forum, that separate WOF from non-WOF. Of course we talk openly with folks who don't have the revelation of WOF stuff. (I'm not talking about whatever error or excess folks love to point out.) But we avoid the controversy by not allowing teaching here, unless you subscribe to the statement of faith, and as I've indicated with his former posts, he's far removed from that.

For folks outside of that, it should be questions and learning. It's real easy to see if that is happening.


Some of which is accurate but we in WoF simply don't want to hear it. Sorry, but if truth be preached....

I have a sufficient amount about Hobart Freeman's errors, about the folks who died claiming they were healed, about so-and-so's big house, expensive car, etc. Those are the things the enemy points to to discredit what we call "WOF". It doesn't bring God glory to point to the 1,000 at your side, or the 10,000 at your right hand that have fallen. We have enough exmaples in the Bible (i.e., the Israelites who perished in the desert). The spirit which that often carries that out is negatively critical (mor than just offering something I don't want to hear). The enemy gets a lot of mileage (apparently from the H. Freeman debacle, or those who die "believing"), and it's getting even more mileage here at the forum from those who take it up. So someone who wants to "fellowship" in here, shouldn't be promoting things that discredit WOF.

Suffice it to say that in the manner it's been used to openly discredit WOF (call it "popular WOF" if you like), that the term "Toxic WOF" has run it's course. It's become an offense. It's not striking out at Bob. It's been going on for years. But... If somebody wants to stop offending WOF people, agree to utterly lay to rest "toxic WOF". If you know you're offending a group, then it is within your power (if you care) to stop.

It's one thing to discuss a specific instance where someone fell short of the mark. That's IF you know why. People judge people all of the time as to why they failed. Often you hear people diss folks who were claiming their healings. I know of one person in particular, where God actually spoke and said He was going to heal him. But this person was being dealt with on some other issues and in the end, God said to prepare, because He was going to take him home. His profession in the hospital, "I'm gonna walk out of here!" He might have. It wasn't his confession/profession that was amiss.

The enemy LOVES to get mileage out of those situations, because then it keeps from daring to believe the Word that your healing is already paid for and God wants you to have it. Sometimes the method used to heal, is to plant the seed of the Word in your heart; the promise of healing. You declare it over your body. You continue to declare. God's walking with you a step at a time. That's WOF. Now if there is a repentance issue and you fail the mark, and the enemy gets some of the upper hand, and your symptoms weigh heavily on you, and you don't recover. People are quick to point that out!

It's important while you're "standing" in the promise, not to toss your medication. Gary Carpenter points this out well. You're waiting for faith to come as you believe. I know someone who threw their glasses away decades ago when they got the revelation of healing. They had to go buy new ones. They didn't understand about "waiting". You might use that as toxic if the need of a physician is great, and you are ignorant of these things.

But continually pointing to failures does not promote believing God. So is it possible to lay to rest the "toxic" thing? Because there is no "toxic WOF". There are people with wrong beliefs. That is not WOF. ALL believers need their doctrine re-aligned. There is no "toxic Christianity". Notice the similarity?

Also, the so-called "errors of WOF" are not for non-WOF folks to come in and explain. It's in bad taste. When it's been brought up in the Spirit Filled section, it sometimes elicits others to rise up and do the same. It promotes a "us vs them" kind of mentality. It is NOT healthy. Sometimes what they critique is correct. Many times it is not. It is in some cases because they don't have the revelation of a what we call "WOF" doctrine (like the seed time and harvest method of obtaining a promise.)

When I mention being Heavenly minded, I mean that we should keep Heaven's perspective and focus on God and what He's doing, not the mistakes of others. Because if it were you needing your healing for something serious, you don't want to hear about all those that died. All that does is reinforce what your natural thinking, your fears, what the enemy says, etc. and displaces believing and faith.

As I can recall Hagin mentioning on numerous occasions, when you're trying to stand and believe God for something, remove yourself from all those disbelieving relatives and "friends" and stick with those who are gonna exhort you in the faith, not bring you into unbelief and doubt.
 
Upvote 0

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
I do want to go ahead and state that I do hope Bob does (dare to) come in here. I'm glad he's reading some of what is said here. I know how the enemy works and take these things where they are not intended. I know they set up the forum with these congregations so that we don't oppose one another on what is approved (or not).

I know that God has worked with Bob for many years and that he's experienced many things of God's kingdom. I know he's for real. He's a musician and he'll use that same gift in Heaven too!

I realize he's been outspoken about WOF, but hopefully we can find some common ground either here or in other places in the forum to get together on.

I'm sure we can observe the rules of the forum and still have room for the things we do agree on.
 
Upvote 0

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
It's ESSENTIALLY the same as the "Test of a Prophet" - i,e, IF what he says HAPPENS - he's a prophet, If it DOESN'T he's a phony. Simple as that.

When a WoF practitioner SAYS he has "Faith" for something, then it MEANS (Biblically) that HE/SHE KNOWS (not "hopes", or "Presumes") that he/she possesses the promise (like my Cancer patient's mother did).

HE/SHE HAS the SUBSTANCE of it, and possesses the EVIDENCE of it - even though it's not there. If there's a "Time constraint" on what's said "in faith", then it gets easy to know, based on the overt results, whether or not it was "Faith, or "Presumption" that was being spoken.

If my Cancer patient had DIED in a few weeks like he was supposed to, then OBVIOUSLY the mother would have been speaking in PRESUMPTION/HOPE, and not FAITH.
I'm glad you clarified that! That's exactly why we don't agree. That's why WOF as we know it is a polar opposite to your belief.

I would strongly recommend you reading Charles Capps book "Seed Time and Harvest). It will explain from the scriptures about how to believe (wisely) in the promise of God, even before you have real faith in that promise. There's a difference between believing and having faith. But if you have faith, you still need to believe to express that. The believing is the action part of it. It's what you do with your mind and your words and what you do with your heart. It's important to correspond your actions to reflect what you believe.

When you plant the Word in you, you need to believe why you're waiting on faith to come.
Your confidence is in the seed because it will reproduce of itself. That's how God set it up. When it's harvest time, faith is there. It doesn't take any effort. At that point you "know", as you say. But you still need to believe during the growth process. As that planting inside you grows, your faith in God is strengthened.

If all you're doing is believing and you never "arrive". Then it's time to figure out why that is the case. But either way, the believing part is necessary. Even if you have to repent or make something right, or do something you're called to do, you still have to believe God. You may still not really even have faith (yet).

It is possible to plant that seed, and maintain your heart, and to get out of order, sin, etc. and miss your harvest. You might listen to the enemy and doublemindedness sets in. You might call that the "false prophet" test failed. But it wasn't the believing that was the problem. It was the "other" area. That's the part you don't know about.

If it's serious and a person dies, that's often the "secret things that belong to the Lord" that's none of our business. We don't know. And since we don't know, we're not in a place to judge that someone was presumptuous to believe God for whatever they're standing for.

It may have been God's will all along for the one who perishes to get healed.
They may have started the process and God was with them in it. But often there are requirements to get God's best. They're received by grace, but God requires us to obey Him. Willingness and obedience eats the fat of the land.

The whole growing of that seed inside you (planted) is by His power. Also, the keeping of our heart from hardness and thorns and birds, pests, etc. is down by our yielding to the Spirit of God. We can't do it, we can only walk in the light of the Word and take the steps He shows us.

That's why it's not our job to judge people who stand for their healing, even if they die. We don't have the whole picture. They're not necessarily a phoney.
 
Upvote 0

ABlessedAnomaly

Teacher of the Word
Apr 28, 2006
2,840
263
Arizona
✟33,962.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
"Can we use faith to get more of what the Bible tells us about love and the divine nature, operating in our lives?"

Talking of divine nature I have a question with reference to humility.

1) A sinner can’t earn salvation (S) by works. He is thereby considered unworthy for S. So our gracious Lord gives it free.
This is true.

2) Similarly a Christian also can’t earn blessings by his works. So our gracious Lord gives it free.

3) Question: While the sinner is not considered worthy for salvation, why is the Christian alone considered “worthy” for blessings? Why shouldn’t the Christian humble by calling himself as unworthy?

The parable of the talents would disagree with you.

Brother, WoF doesn't take the stance that we are unworthy (as some denominations cling to the OT imagery of being nothing more than a worm). No, God redeemed us from that. We are imputed with Christ's righteousness.

We have dominion in this earth and are taught to produce. Our actions result in blessing. This is not to say that many blessings do not come purely through grace, but we must actively, desirously walk in God's will to be in position to receive the blessing. It is our choice and action.

God didn't say "hey, it ain't you; you have nothing to do to get the blessing." No, He said:

Deuteronomy 30:19 (NET)
Today I invoke heaven and earth as a witness against you that I have set life and death, blessing and curse, before you. Therefore choose life so that you and your descendants may live!

Choose life! You're choice; your action.

Once again, think about things like the parable of talents. Our actions impact the blessing.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
151,902
19,676
USA
✟2,037,136.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
MOD HAT

This thread is closed for review

Edit - This thread is staying closed. Here is the problem - it is not okay to go against WOF beliefs in this particular forum. The same goes for any of the congregational forums. If you disagree, you may fellowship, or not post. The rule that applies is this:


Congregational Forum Restrictions and orthodox Christian Only Forums
Members who do not truly share the core beliefs and teachings of a specific congregational forum may post in fellowship or ask questions, but they may not teach or debate within the forum. There are forums reserved for orthodox Christian members only. Please do not post in these forums unless you are truly a Nicene Creed, Trinitarian Christian (please see our Statement of Faith to know exactly what that is). If you wish to discuss unorthodox doctrines, you may do so in the Unorthodox Doctrinal Discussion forum.


It is also not okay to talk about other members
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.