Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hey, you really should know something about a field of research before you make such bold statements.
Are you sure you ignored it? It sounds like you tried to counter it. That's sorta the opposite of ignoring something.your personal attack is ignored. i do know something but if you had taken the timwe to post something constructive according to the topic and not attack the poster you would see that.
Dig a little deeper archie (you are an archaeologist after all) and you'll find the information you desire. You really think a Yahoo news article is going to give all the pertinent facts?archaeologist said:things happen read the article and you will see thatthey have nothing to base their claims on.
Sorry, but your attacks have been deeply insulting to entire professions. And they do not seem to be very well researched from your part.your personal attack is ignored. i do know something but if you had taken the timwe to post something constructive according to the topic and not attack the poster you would see that.
i can make such statements because i do know the field and i know they don't know. read the article again, they only have 1 statue as 'evidence' and such thinking is based upon conjecture because they have never found a royal aztec tomb before.
they may be right but then again, they are not usually.
Prove it archie. let's see credible links that they were making false claims, the yahoo link doesn't count.archaeologist said:they shouldn't be making false claims, either
we do not trust secular scientists because they assume things they cannot prove thenwork towards a result with that presupposition in mnd.
We are used to this by now. Wild fantastical conjecture and speculation with not a whit of evidence.archaeologist said:stick to the topic of the thread. we do not trust secular scientists because they assume things they cannot prove thenwork towards a result with that presupposition in mnd.
they are about as objective as a mother when her child gets accused of a crime.
they make these fantastic statements to draw interest and they do not have a clue because they haven't even dug down to the tomb yet. THEY DO NOT KNOW and they are making claims based on minute evidence that could mean anything.
There's no such thing as a secular scientist
Creationism & science are a contradiction in terms
Creationism is a heretical offshoot of Christianity dedicated to telling lies about the world. And about God.
Prove it archie. let's see credible links that they were making false claims, the yahoo link doesn't count.
There's no such thing as a secular scientist
actually, there is. if they are not christian, then they are secular. basic christianity 101.
....
So - finally - we have Archie's definition of "secular science". "Science as practiced by non-Christians".
Much of the world might differ with that definition, but that is Archie's.
you ignore the fact that i have been doing that throughout this thread. but then again you are like assyrian,a misrepresenter.
....
you ignore the fact that i have been doing that throughout this thread. but then again you are like assyrian,a misrepresenter.
Dinosaur mass grave discovered in Switzerland
he dug up the remains of two Plateosaurus.
For that headline, blame the journalist not the scientist.here is another reason why:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070809/sc_nm/swiss_dinosaurs_dc;_ylt=ApZILmb29LOurrUkew.gZhGs0NUE
talk about misleading 2 is not mass and the rest of what was said in the article is pure speculation.
now it woul dhave been more honest to say : we found two dinosaur skeletons and we hope to find more but this crap is inexcusable.
Our amateur paleontologist found two Plateosauruses on a building site. It sounds like other Plateosauruses had been found within 1.5 km of the area.The finds show that an area known for Plateosaurus finds for decades may be much larger than originally thought.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?