• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why this hate for Islam?

Status
Not open for further replies.

randomman

Regular Member
Jun 11, 2007
381
5
✟23,041.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Single

if i am really touched by your kindness and really care about you as a human, I have one thing to say:

May Allah swt open your heart and guide you to Islam for your own sake ... Amen
 
Upvote 0

GeratTzedek

Meaning Righteous Proselyte to Judaism
Aug 5, 2007
4,213
339
64
Los Angeles area
Visit site
✟6,003.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Jeb:

I'm really surprised. You honestly aren't informed as to the empiricist exploits of the Vikings? You truly think that men conquering men is related to a particular set of religions, and not to human nature?
 
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Jeb:

I'm really surprised. You honestly aren't informed as to the empiricist exploits of the Vikings? You truly think that men conquering men is related to a particular set of religions, and not to human nature?

You misunderstand me. I am not appealing to some sort of objective standard of good vs. evil, justice vs. injustice, virtue vs. sin. It's a question of "me and mine" vs. "them and their's". Historically "them and their's" won, and built a world. I fundamentally disagree with just about everything about that world, and I want a world modeled after an older, and I believe better, way. I don't care about some sort of "objective" "view from nowhere" where all empiricism was bad; my view is from somewhere, and if the Vikings had won I would take as much pride and happiness in that world as I resent and hate this world. I'm not against people winning, I am against my people losing.

I think you are confusing what I think is good for everyone (my meta-theory, pan-nationalism or pan-tribalism) and what I want for me and mine (my micro-theory, anti-Christianity and a pagan nation not dominated by the reductive view of monotheism). My anti-Christianity is not based on some sort of universalist appeal to a higher order of justice...I don't need the rhetoric of "moral superiority" to wage my wars. It is based on the very personal, very situated concerns of revenge against an ancient enemy and freedom from a world built in the image of a foreign god.
 
Upvote 0

GeratTzedek

Meaning Righteous Proselyte to Judaism
Aug 5, 2007
4,213
339
64
Los Angeles area
Visit site
✟6,003.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Jeb: there is nothing particulary Jewish or Christian about the Golden Rule. Every major spiritual philosopher in the world has advanced it. Therefore if I advance the Golden Rule, I'm not advancing Judaism, or even monotheism.

For someone to say, "It's not about right and wrong, its about what's best for me and mine and screw everyone else," is simple moral immaturity on EVERYONE's scale, including paganism.
 
Upvote 0

GeratTzedek

Meaning Righteous Proselyte to Judaism
Aug 5, 2007
4,213
339
64
Los Angeles area
Visit site
✟6,003.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
You haven't answered my question. Do you consider okay for people in this forum, including you or me, to misrepresent others here?
 
Upvote 0

GeratTzedek

Meaning Righteous Proselyte to Judaism
Aug 5, 2007
4,213
339
64
Los Angeles area
Visit site
✟6,003.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
You know, Jeb, the more I think about it, the more your idea about you being open to moral correction only from people within your own microculture seems like your excuse making for doing whatever you like. If that is a major misunderstanding, then please do go back and explain things in a bit more detail, becuase this is surely the way it is coming across.
 
Upvote 0

TheKingOfImmortality

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2007
560
33
39
✟23,415.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Single


Frist of all, I think you good person for admiting you own faults on on your end.

Secondly I think its because of number of things.


1. When you have a website with both Christians and Muslims who both belive there holy book is the only turth and every thing els is a lie, your just asking for the two to go out it.

2. I think people are scared. There confussed and angery with the events of 9/11, the war on terror, ect. When people are scared and angery they want somthing to blame. Some, sadly have decided that all Muslims are to blame and that Islam itself is the problem.

3. most people get there info about Islam from the news. Now dont get me wrong, I am not saying the media is against Islam, but between the two who is the news going to focus on? A muslim who is a good guy trying to help the world or a Radical Muslim who kills people? It much like asking between the two who is the media going to watch? A Christian who helps a famliy that lost there home or when Pat Robertson threatens the people of Dover for not teaching Creation with hell?
 
Upvote 0

TheKingOfImmortality

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2007
560
33
39
✟23,415.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Single


To tell the turth, I am not sure if I could join a Abrahamic path again ethier. Islam has all the same problams Christainty had for me witch you just named. (at least when all three are taken to literaltly)
 
Upvote 0

GeratTzedek

Meaning Righteous Proselyte to Judaism
Aug 5, 2007
4,213
339
64
Los Angeles area
Visit site
✟6,003.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think you guys are VERY naive if you imagine that pagans of old were always more tolerant.

You might want to take out a history text, and learn about the Jews and Christians martyred by "tolerant" "non-dogmatic" pagans.

Human nature is human nature.
 
Upvote 0

GeratTzedek

Meaning Righteous Proselyte to Judaism
Aug 5, 2007
4,213
339
64
Los Angeles area
Visit site
✟6,003.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hey, King. you cracked me up. The media is so anti-religion in general. I think they pick inordinantly on Christianity, but Islam, Judaism, and everything else under the sun gets treated badly and unfairly. Basically, the media swings with a SECULAR bias.
 
Upvote 0

ChildishFears

Regular Member
Aug 22, 2007
667
27
Somewhere in the vast Universe.
✟23,457.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

I agree
 
Upvote 0

HumbleSiPilot77

Senior Contributor
Jan 4, 2003
10,040
421
Arizona
✟27,775.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

Well, it's like your "Golden Rule" comment. I don't care who advanced or why, I don't agree with it, nor think it is representative of what people do in the world. Therefore your rebuke using it just doesn't mean anything to me. It's not that I only care about moral rebuke from a certain group of people, I just don't accept the MONOtheist, MONOculturist assumptions about what right and wrong are.

Let's go back to your comment about my "me and mine" schtick. I don't believe there is any objective, universal moral standard, period. I don't even believe that there can be universal, objective knowledge claims. The attempt to base ethics (and all of our notions) on some transcendent value system is just not what I believe to be correct. I believe in a situated philosophy, where relata are define by their relations to the whole, and everything else comes out of that. The result is an ethic that is realistic and true in that it actually describes how people really are in the real world.

Earlier you talked about the "fear of other" being the problem of the Jews. Now, let's ignore the way that conveniently pathologizes anyone who might have a valid criticism of Judaism as a culture or religion, and just look at the moral implication of your words, what you are assuming: you assume that we all share the pluralist, "let's all live together in shiny-happiness" ethic, and that anything that interferes with the pattycake games is inherently bad. I disagree, and would redefine your pathologized and moralistic term "fear of other" as "perfectly reasonable self-preservation instinct". See how a different set of moral assumptions naturally lead to a different classification of moral behaviour?

Now, what makes the pagan more "tolerant" (gods, I hate that word) than the monotheist is that I know and understand you have a different ethical framework, and that your choices and what you consider morally salient will naturally come out differently than mine. You, and every other monotheist out there who hasn't been eaten by the relativism monster, assume that your morals are the "real" ones, and just like Bushmaster, with his normal knowledge of history and deep understanding of beliefs other than his own, you condescend to my value system, rather than trying to see what it implies or that it might have something more to it than your simplistic and patronizing conclusion.

Very simply, your assumptions about what is right differ almost completely from my own. You believe there is an objective epistemic standard for moral claims, that your god revealed them, and that all that it takes to be moral is to reconcile your attitudes and behaviours to that standard. I believe in a distributed network of "thick ethical concepts" or virtues (see Bernard Williams, "Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy") which arise naturally out my concerns as a situated being, who is historical, spatial, and embodied in a world (see Donna Haraway, "Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the. privilege of partial perspective"). Therefore what is moral for me might not be moral for you, because your set of relations differ from my own. This is not some "low-brow" or "immature" moral theory, it is simply one that acknowledges a different foundational approach. I believe, literally, that it is moral for each person to pursue their own interests, and that those interests are informed by their situatedness.

What seems so interesting to me is that this entire way of looking at the world is not unique to me or other extremists. It is a normal component of "identity politics", and when seen in that light we don't bat an eye at any other struggle and resistance oriented politics. It's normal for black radicals to look out for black interests first, for radical feminists to look out for women first, etc. This is all due to the notion of a situated ethics, and to a large part my philosophy has been influenced by the philosophies of radical unionism and identity politics. This is simply the natural consequence of the rejection of MONOculture...your values aren't mine, and you should fight for them (or not, as they dictate) and the same goes for me. MONOculture says that values are defined by the "in" group and that anyone who is in the "out" group must redefine their ethics (and themselves thereby) to conform or be "wrong".

It's very funny to have the naive and typical MONOculturist assumption of the universality of their ethics result in your calling my ethics immature. I have studied philosophy for the better part of the last 15 years, and been specifically studying ethics for the last five. I have read every major work on ethical philosophy in the western and eastern traditions, and you are simply wrong. Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics does not put forth the Golden Rule, nor does Plato in the dialogues or the Republic. None of the Stoics do, nowhere does it exist in Kant unless you truly mangle the Categorical Imperative. It is not in Mill, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche (except to rant against it), or even the modern work of Williams, etc.

Also, while it does appear in some faiths, it certainly does not in all, and certainly does not in mine. What is ironic is that your very assumption of the universalizability of your ethical stances is an example of exactly why I hate monotheism. It's like an imperialism of the mind, a virus of reduction and abstraction.

BTW, I also don't think war is bad, I think democracy is bad, I don't think all people are "equal" (again, what would this notion mean without a "god's-eye-view" to look from? People are not equal to each other, all are unique and the attempt to make them all the same is fantasy), I do not believe in the "sanctity" of human life, I don't believe there is any sort of objective standard for metaphysical, epistemological, or ethical claims (all claims are from somewhere, all discourse is imperative), and I don't believe in the notion of moral "innocence" or "guilt". I do believe that races differ fundamentally in character, though I do not believe that they can be judged along any linear scale against each other, and I do not agree that social pluralism is good or natural. I don't like communism or capitalism, don't think the common human is competent to make large-scale political decisions (part of the reason I believe in small tribes). In fact, I disagree with the fundamental assumptions of modern civilization and the political construct the "nation-state". I do believe different morals apply to the self-group vs. the other group.

Hmmm, let's see if there are any other modern heresies and thought-crime I can commit...none coming to me at the moment. Maybe later.
 
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Surely, that made a lot of difference...

I let you go back to your comic books you worship...


Again, you demonstrate your vast knowledge and understanding. I suppose you think Buddhists worship Buddha and that Taoism worships some guy named Tao.

So, since Christianity is a Jewish heresy that stole the premises of the surrounding pagan metaphysics, does that mean that Christianity is twice-made up? Fictionalized from a fiction?

You know what I think? I think you feel the call of the old gods, and so you have to dismiss them and trivialize their history to maintain your acceptance of your foreign faith. It's okay, I can empathize with that, I did very much the same thing for a long time. The call of blood can be very disquieting. As Jung noted in his "Wotan" essay, it has never been particularly safe nor comfortable to fall into the hands of a living god. Keep dismissing long enough, and you might die before you have to deal with them...good luck!
 
Upvote 0

HumbleSiPilot77

Senior Contributor
Jan 4, 2003
10,040
421
Arizona
✟27,775.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Again, you demonstrate your vast knowledge and understanding. I suppose you think Buddhists worship Buddha and that Taoism worships some guy named Tao.

Yea, that is all you do, you "suppose"... When challenged though, you show your fangs, take a stab at "Oh I am logical" jargon and argue stuff that is only alive and well in WoW and other fantasy satisfiers. Keep on crying, you have been conquered, and there is no going back.

So, since Christianity is a Jewish heresy that stole the premises of the surrounding pagan metaphysics, does that mean that Christianity is twice-made up? Fictionalized from a fiction?

Yes, with only difference that this fiction was real, and that is why your fantasy gods are in online gaming now... Take that fiction and enjoy it.

You know what I think?

Nope, and I don't care...

Keep dismissing long enough, and you might die before you have to deal with them...good luck!

Send them to me, I will deal with them now... Grab your ouija board and send them away...
 
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

I notice all your military trappings and US nationalism...looks like your intelligence got its facts wrong again. My tradition (and most real occultists in general) don't use Ouija boards. Those were spiritualists in the 19th century and a board game. We use different methods entirely, and if you saw them you would be amazed at how much they look like your liturgy...except they work. Better luck next time.

Keep showing them true colors, boy. Such an easy straight man...I couldn't have manufactured a better foil for my purposes. Ignorant, belligerent, and proud of it...the perfect Christian.
 
Upvote 0

elijah115

Senior Veteran
Oct 29, 2005
3,282
80
✟26,529.00
Faith
Christian
I don't really think anything that Hamas does or insurgents in Iraq do can be justified. I don't support murder whether it is by US soldiers or pro palestine or pro Israel groups. I refuse to empathise. Israel is a small country surrounded by plenty of other countries with "loads" (not insufficient) land. I find it impossible to believe that those in Palestine don't have enough land to co exist with Israel without taking Jerusalem as their capital. I also find it impossible to believe that the US troops wouldn't have to leave if all insurgents gave up arms and became law abiding. God does not want us saved so that we can kill each other over superfacial things like religion or land. You can't love God and murder another human being.
 
Upvote 0

Kutte

Regular Member
Dec 30, 2007
1,197
66
USA
✟39,166.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Green
GerTzedek,
You wrote:
Basically, the media swings with a SECULAR bias.

Now, that's an interesting observation. However, it is not the mission of the media at large to represent or promote any particular religious views but to present the news as it happens.
Christianity as well as Islam and Judaism have their own media outlets.

Kutte

*****************************
Take a peek at my WAR PRAYER blog.
 
Upvote 0

Loner

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2005
661
25
Mars =)
✟23,454.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
I was starting to become an Islam hater, witch is somthing that I am vary ashamed of......


I have hard time showing my face in religous groupes like this now.

I think for me I was cought up in the momment. Pluse I was new to the religon and was just starting to learn about it. (my own faith) Pluse I was going threw some dark times in my life that Islam played role in (but I dont blame the religon)

I will never know for sure why I acted the way I did but I know I will regert it for the rest of my life....
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.