You mean that man gets to play God and decide who lives and dies?
I mean that there is only so much money, this applies whether you are a family, state or nation.
Why can you not donate every penny you have to charity well because you have to live.
Same thing when there are limited resources at some point the decision MUST be made WHO would benefit most from that resource.
Take transplants, there are only so many right? Moreover there are only so many people both willing and able to donate his or her organs.
If I am 44 years old, and I have a liver problem, and suppose I drink alcohol once every quarter well I would not consider that to really hurt the liver enough to knock someone out of a transplant; particularly if their drinking has NOTHING to do with the liver issue .
Now on the other hand suppose you have someone like me. I am 24, but have been on medication that may or may NOT mess up my liver for a 1/3 of my life or better and will be on those drugs until they put me in the ground.
Moreover, if I was granted a transplant I would have to take anti-rejection medication ALONG with my other for life.
If that 44 year old is otherwise healthy, has no additional issues, and is not likely to ruin the liver by his or her furture behavior; even if the person HAD a heavy drinking history and quit several years earlier) who would be more likely to benefit from the new liver? The person who will have to take medication she has been taking since she was a minor and the anti- rejection medication or the person who is otherwise healthy ( even if that person is nearly twice my age?) that would be them. As a result, I have decided that even IF they would put me on a list I will die before I will go on one because the fact is that I would STILL have to do what likely messed up my first one,
When you have fewer resources than you have people needing them you HAVE to make decisions and it is better for THOSE people to make decisions than it is for the government to which they would HAVE to.