- May 29, 2012
- 41,108
- 24,135
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
And you propose to resolve this problem by electing a different psychopath?
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why the Public incorrectly evaluates candidates
- Thread starter MorkandMindy
- Start date
And you propose to resolve this problem by electing a different psychopath?
- Dec 16, 2006
- 7,401
- 785
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Donald Trump will stabilise some things, the immigration problem needs to be fixed,
but other problems he will fail to fix, his idea of economics is Reaganomics which is to lower taxes and raise government spending on the military a lot, so it is spend now pay later. The problem is later almost here.
His lack of political knowledge is amazing but I have some confidence he will often chose the best option when a few are presented.
Donald wants peace with Russia and has offered a no first use of nuclear weapons which is the stance Russia has long taken and is happy to cut a deal both countries and both leaders are happy with.
but other problems he will fail to fix, his idea of economics is Reaganomics which is to lower taxes and raise government spending on the military a lot, so it is spend now pay later. The problem is later almost here.
His lack of political knowledge is amazing but I have some confidence he will often chose the best option when a few are presented.
Donald wants peace with Russia and has offered a no first use of nuclear weapons which is the stance Russia has long taken and is happy to cut a deal both countries and both leaders are happy with.
Upvote
0
Nobody is going to fix the "immigration problem," because to Big Business and Big Money, it's not a problem, it's a goldmine.
Upvote
0
- Dec 16, 2006
- 7,401
- 785
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Yes, immigrants undercut our wages but to the multi billionaires they are reducing costs and increasing profits.
This is why it would be good if our rulers were from the people and for the people. Hillary and Donald are billionaires so are playing for the other side.
Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein are from the people so are on our side.
Upvote
0
- Dec 16, 2006
- 7,401
- 785
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
My response to immigrant refugees was we should not be destroying the countries they lived in.
Having to leave their home country is stressful for them and is leaving behind the knowledge of the area they lived in, they may then need to learn a new language, and new skills.
Also the support network of friends and family.
I am very familiar with this from living in England without at support structure and a somewhat alien culture.
Many of them would not come here if they did not need to.
I just read part of Jill Stein's response and it is the same as mine.
Having to leave their home country is stressful for them and is leaving behind the knowledge of the area they lived in, they may then need to learn a new language, and new skills.
Also the support network of friends and family.
I am very familiar with this from living in England without at support structure and a somewhat alien culture.
Many of them would not come here if they did not need to.
I just read part of Jill Stein's response and it is the same as mine.
Upvote
0
- Dec 16, 2006
- 7,401
- 785
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
The reason I started this thread is because I've met a number of Hillary supporters who total deny that she has ever deliberately done anything wrong
by claiming that supporting the destruction of Iraq for 5 years was just a mistake anyone could make, after all many of the public did,
and The Washington Post supported her destruction of Libya by saying it was just a failure to learn the lessons from Iraq.
I know a certain amount about psychopaths and she is a psycho. but her supporters don't want Donald and so claim she must be perfect.
I have a solution, about 80% of the population don't want Donald and about 70% don't want Hillary, but as Donald pointed out
those 70% are far more convinced of the lethality of having Hillary voted in, so much so that if Donald shot a few of his supporters the remainder would still support him, (because having Hillary in would result in a lot more deaths).
I think Donald should have thought of a better way of expressing that, like that those opposed to Hillary have far better reasons than those opposed to him.
So here comes a new thread, why don't we all take the best option left? Vote for Jill Stein.
by claiming that supporting the destruction of Iraq for 5 years was just a mistake anyone could make, after all many of the public did,
and The Washington Post supported her destruction of Libya by saying it was just a failure to learn the lessons from Iraq.
I know a certain amount about psychopaths and she is a psycho. but her supporters don't want Donald and so claim she must be perfect.
I have a solution, about 80% of the population don't want Donald and about 70% don't want Hillary, but as Donald pointed out
those 70% are far more convinced of the lethality of having Hillary voted in, so much so that if Donald shot a few of his supporters the remainder would still support him, (because having Hillary in would result in a lot more deaths).
I think Donald should have thought of a better way of expressing that, like that those opposed to Hillary have far better reasons than those opposed to him.
So here comes a new thread, why don't we all take the best option left? Vote for Jill Stein.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
