• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why Sola Scriptura isn't God's plan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The Church which was founded on upon Christ, was neither the Roman Catholic church nor the Eastern Orthodox church.
It wasn't Protestant.
The New Testament church was biblical.
How could it have been? The Bible wasn't compiled to the 300s.
 
Upvote 0

sheina

Born Crucified
Mar 30, 2007
1,042
188
Mississippi
✟24,514.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
False; there were many years between Christ's establishment of his Church and the first Apostolic writings.

The Apostles and the bishops they appointed were the authorities in the Church during that time.
Another incorrect presumtion on your part. This is just your opinion once again. And I bet you got your information straight from the "updated" church history books of the Roman Catholic church....correct?
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Nah. Your denomination has no authority except for itself. Is called solo ecclessia. I don't have to pretend anything since I am not the one making the wild, unsupported claims that my church wrote the bible.

Show from scripture why you have your position. Oh, I remember! I've asked you and you've replied that you just believe it to be so.

Apparently that's not unsupported!
 
Upvote 0

sheina

Born Crucified
Mar 30, 2007
1,042
188
Mississippi
✟24,514.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It wasn't Protestant
I didn't say it was Protestant, did I? The Protestants weren't around until the 16th century at the start of the Protestant Reformation.
How could it have been? The Bible wasn't compiled to the 300s.
The Body of Christ/the Church has NEVER been without the Scriptures. The Old Testament certainly was around at that time...it was around when Jesus walked this earth, for He quoted from it. The New Testament canon was completed during the first century.
 
Upvote 0

Ortho_Cat

Orthodox Christian
Aug 12, 2009
9,973
680
KS
✟36,039.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The Church which was founded on upon Christ, was neither the Roman Catholic church nor the Eastern Orthodox church.

I see.

The New Testament church was biblical.

How were they "biblical" if they didn't even have the bible? It was 20 years until the first account of Paul was written down after Christ ascended. Church teaching was carried on solely by oral tradition at this point, and of course the old testament.[/quote]

The Scriptures were the only and final authority in the early churches.
citation needed.


can you define what this means?

There has alway been a remnant of born again believers from the first century church to this present day.....

Did this remnant leave you any writings (other than the NT)?


Again, i would like to see proof of this 'remnant' church that has gone unnoticed by history for 1800+ years until the baptist church was founded.
 
Upvote 0

ivebeenshown

Expert invisible poster and thread killer
Apr 27, 2010
7,073
623
✟32,740.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Another incorrect presumption on your part. This is just your opinion once again.
When were the first NT texts written?
And I bet you got your information straight from the "updated" church history books of the Roman Catholic church....correct?
Gambling is a bad habit.
You can continue to reject and deny that those verses have anything to do with Sola Scriptura...that is your choice. However, your rejection and denial doesn't change the Truth about any of those verses I posted.
...and that tells me that you have no comeback. None of the verses you posted mention scripture, save one, which mentions the Pentateuch.
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It wasn't Protestant.

How could it have been? The Bible wasn't compiled to the 300s.
How could it not have been?
It was fully in protest against the spiritual blindness the orthodox religious system of it's time.
Reform is an idea as old as Adam.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Another incorrect presumtion on your part. This is just your opinion once again. And I bet you got your information straight from the "updated" church history books of the Roman Catholic church....correct?

The books that we now have in the Bible were written quite early on. However they were not compiled together into the Bible happened 300 years after Jesus
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The books that we now have in the Bible were written quite early on. However they were not compiled together into the Bible happened 300 years after Jesus
People had compilations. Some had more some had less. it isn't as if no one had any idea of what comprised the body of scripture until the councils got around to asserting their dubious authority over it.
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Show from scripture why you have your position. Oh, I remember! I've asked you and you've replied that you just believe it to be so.

Apparently that's not unsupported!
I love how you demand Sola Scriptura for satisfaction.
It tickles me every time.
 
Upvote 0

laconicstudent

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,671
720
✟16,224.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

sheina

Born Crucified
Mar 30, 2007
1,042
188
Mississippi
✟24,514.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The books that we now have in the Bible were written quite early on. However they were not compiled together into the Bible happened 300 years after Jesus

Old Testament Canon. The Old Testament was collected by the Jews (Romans 3:1-2). All 39 books of the Old Testament are thought to have been finished by the time of Ezra (Luke 11:51).

New Testament Canon. The New Testament was written by the apostles (John 16:13). The New Testament was completed during the days of the apostles (Jude 1:3). The New Testament was received by the believers in the early churches (John 10:27; 1Thessalonians 2:13).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

No, no, no. Look at the dates you have cited to try to prove a tradition is tied to an apostle

Look folks, we got scripture or tradition. Tie that tradition of your to an apostle. And in the meantime, try not to behave like the heretics against whom Irenaeus wrote regarding scripture.

Scripture:
" 1. When, however, they are confuted from the Scriptures, they turn round and accuse these same Scriptures, as if they were not correct, nor of authority, and [assert] that they are ambiguous, and that the truth cannot be extracted from them by those who are ignorant of tradition. For [they allege] that the truth was not delivered by means of written documents, but vivâ voce: wherefore also Paul declared, “But we speak wisdom among those that are perfect, but not the wisdom of this world.”33113311 1 Cor. ii. 6. "

Tradition, but note very carefully what is required:
" 2. But, again, when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, [and] which is preserved by means of the succession of presbyters in the Churches, they object to tradition, saying that they themselves are wiser not merely than the presbyters, but even than the apostles, because they have discovered the unadulterated truth. "


Where is that succession of faithful men who taught the same faith as Peter, Paul, and the others? We know where it is not.

Certain groups speak against scripture that it is ambiguous and the truth cannot be extracted therefrom. Incredible, but nothing new under the sun.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.