> wurm wrote: ... I don't see anything here that belongs in the unorthodox theology forum, josephearl ... Do you?
.
] On 20Feb josephearl replies: As a matter of fact I do see unorthodoxy here.
.
wurm say: And yet none of the "perverse teachings" you mention are present in the text that zjones90 and I just quoted. Therefore your impassioned objections have NO relevance to the current topic ... which is why prophets write. In other words: You do NOT see any unorthodoxy *there*! And that is the text that friend zjones90 and I are discussing. If you have nothing pertinent to say regarding the topic at hand, then why don't you just find a more interesting thread in another forum, eh?
.
] j: You quote a verse from Nephi as if it is Christian scripture and it is not.
.
I did no such thing, josephearl. I just quoted what zjones90 wrote. He may think that they are scripture, but I don't. That's why I asked him what Ne is. Right, josephearl? You don't have to worry that he's going to convert me; if that's what you're upset about.
.
] j: And frankly I find it disgusting the number of times a so called follower of Jesus trys to teach
] others that Mormonism is Christian. It is a polytheistic hodge-podge of gods and blasphemes
] the truth by its perverse teachings <snip>
.
But we aren't even discussing *any* of that, josephearl. Discussions of *that* nature obviously belong in the unorthodox theology forum. Hey dude, I do believe that you are the one braking the forum-rules!
