Archaeopteryx
Wanderer
Are you suggesting that we need not invoke the action of supernatural agents in order to explain natural phenomena that we do not fully understand yet?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If so, how do you define your gods? More basically, why do you still NEED these gods?
If a god who "controls" (not "is) the Weak Force, then could science suggest the existence of this god (same argument to the existence of soul)? Why don't you save the trouble by scratching out this god? If you do that, what are you going to lose in your theology?
Yes, you will lose the god, but you still have the Weak Force. Would that be enough?
there were many ancient events till now that cannot be proven, but this does not mean they did not happened for certain, that is why it was said that it is a matter of right faith, because there are things that cannot be proven with physical evidence, or as it is written:
1 Corinthians 2:7-16 "we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ."
Blessings
Are you suggesting that we need not invoke the action of supernatural agents in order to explain natural phenomena that we do not fully understand yet?
The way I see it is that the natural is something like a set of postulates, which cover all experience (sense data and natural interpretations of it) and possibilities of rationality (math, logic etc).Are you suggesting that we need not invoke the action of supernatural agents in order to explain natural phenomena that we do not fully understand yet?
it was already explained to you how the other lords(christs) do not seek the profit of all humans for abundant and everlasting life in God the Father, but only the Lord Jesus Christ works for true overall(all-embracing) salvation
You need to prove that this is true, you can't just state it to be true.
And even if you did prove it to be true, that doesn't prove that Christianity is true.
man, if the faith was just some proof, then it would not have been a faith, for to believe in God means to trust in Him because of the lack of (enough): knowledge, wisdom, dignity, power, might, ability, etc., that is why the Lord Jesus Christ said: "blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed."(John 20:29), because if the full guarantee could be completely seen, then there would even have been no hope, or as it is written: "hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it."(Romans 8:24-25)
Blessings
Juvenissm, any response to my assertion that Baha'ism is more logical and reasonable than christianity?
Best you educate yourself on other religions, before you claim Christianity is the most logical and reasonable.
Perhaps you should educate yourself on other religions before you claim the concept of God to be illogical and unreasonable.
And I'm sure you have studied the other 4,200 religions in the world yourself....
Perhaps you should educate yourself on other religions before you claim the concept of God to be illogical and unreasonable.
Best you educate yourself on other religions, before you claim Christianity is the most logical and reasonable.
"No religion is as grand as christianity!"
"How many other religions do you know?"
"Zero!"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?