• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why no evidence FOR creation/ID?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aman777

Christian
Jan 26, 2013
10,351
584
✟30,043.00
Faith
Baptist

Changing descending from Water Gen 1:21 to evolving "naturally" from nothing is false, deceptive and ignorant. God told us HOW He did it but many don't believe Him, putting their faith instead in the changeable thoughts of mortal men. In the end, the discoveries of Science will confirm Genesis IF one has the proper interpretation, which can only be understood by those with "increased knowledge" in the last days. Daniel 12:4
 
Upvote 0

Aman777

Christian
Jan 26, 2013
10,351
584
✟30,043.00
Faith
Baptist
Here's a clue: Humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor.

False since Humans (Adam) was made the 3rd Day. Gen 2:4-7 AND "every living creature that moveth) was made the 5th Day. Gen 1:21 Either God is lying or changeable scientists are wrong, which is why they made their assumptions changeable. Amen?
 
Upvote 0

My what now? Well I suppose it is 666 or so. Does that answer your question?
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
“Acceptable” is subjective. Nothing is objectively OK or not OK. Everything just “is” and how we feel about it is subjective.
 
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,553
709
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟140,373.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
It's not a hypothesis anyone would pursue, because no one thinks humans evolved from chimpanzees. I think you need to learn a bit about the TOE before you attempt to debate it.

The Smithsonian disagrees:

Human evolution is the lengthy process of change by which people originated from apelike ancestors. Scientific evidence shows that the physical and behavioral traits shared by all people originated from apelike ancestors and evolved over a period of approximately six million years (emphasis added, source).​

Is a chimpanzee ape-like?

Oz
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Troll. Calling it. You’re a troll. You can’t seriously be saying you don’t know the difference between a cousin and an ancestor.
 
Reactions: Jimmy D
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,553
709
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟140,373.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
I thought you'd been warned against giving heed to endless genealogies?

Jimmy,

1 Tim 1:3b-4 (NIV) states:

You may command certain people not to teach false doctrines any longer 4or to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. Such things promote controversial speculations rather than advancing God’s work—which is by faith​

Paul writing to Timothy does not command certain people not to teach about the place of genealogies in Scripture. What was Paul commanding against?
  • false doctrines,
  • myths, and
  • endless genealogies, which consist of
  • controversial speculations.
Paul was not discounting teaching on say, the genealogies at the beginning of Matthew's Gospel, but speculations involving 'endless genealogies'.

To what was he referring?

Many scholars see in genealogies a clear reference to the second-century gnostic emanations. But there seems stronger reasons to suppose that the anonymous false teachers were members of a sect attracted by the more speculative aspects of Judaism. In Tit[us] 1:14, where the same word muthoi [myths] occurs, they are described as Jewish, and there is a strong assumption that Paul has the same kind of people in mind here. An example of the way in which Jewish delight in such speculations led to the composition of mythical histories based on the Old Testament is found in the Jewish book of Jubilees. It was inevitable that methods so unrestrained (endless aperantos, may be understood in this sense) would lead to further questions, and the whole unprofitable business impressed the apostle with its utter futility. No wonder he contrasts it with godly edifying which is in faith (en pistei). The Greek word, oikonomia, rendered edifying ['advancing God's work' NIV], is difficult to translate. It means properly 'the office of stewardship' but came to be used in the sense of 'administration', which is the general Pauline usage (cf. 1 Cor 9:17; Eph 3:2, 9). Moffatt renders the phrase 'the divine order which belongs to faith', but as Scott points out 'the contrast is between two activities, not between two views of the world'. Paul has just stressed the pointlessness of the false teaching and now contrasts this with the discipline which belongs to faith (RSV 'the divine training' (Donald Guthrie 1957/1990. The Pastoral Epistles. Nottingham UK: Inter-Varsity Press).
Therefore, Jimmy, I recommend that you do more research into the meaning of not giving heed to endless genealogies.

Here you have given AV a one-line jab in the intellectual 'ribs', without providing evidence to support your statement.

Oz
 
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,553
709
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟140,373.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private

I asked you if there was any directed purpose in the universe and your reply was: 'Correct, there is no directed purpose'.

If there is no directed purpose, anyone can choose whatever morality they want to pursue and you and I have no reason for objection because there is no 'directed purpose in the universe' (your words).

I was pointing to the logical conclusions of your 'no-directed-purpose' world view. There's nothing we can do to stop the terrorists, Hitler, paedophiles, September 11, etc. If they are pursuing their own 'purpose', why should any person, army or government stop them?

A purposeless universe means a purposeless life with no direction. Hitler was, therefore, right in doing whatever he wanted to do in his purposeless life. Why stop him?

That's the logical conclusion of your purposeless worldview.

Oz
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If there is no directed purpose, anyone can choose whatever morality they want to pursue and you and I have no reason for objection because there is no 'directed purpose in the universe' (your words).
Wrong. Reasons for objection can draw from shared values and goals, regardless of the universe’s indifference.
 
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,553
709
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟140,373.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
I thought you'd been warned against giving heed to endless genealogies?

You have committed an Appeal to Self-Evident Truth Fallacy.

How come? This fallacy means that you have asked a question that presumes AV1611 has made a statement that supports genealogies, which your claim is that it comes under the category of 'endless genealogies'.

What is self-evident to you may not be self-evident to others.

Your fallacy has this outline of explanation:

AV1611: He made a statement about Jesus' genealogy from Luke 3.

Jimmy: He claims that AV should have taken notice of the warning about giving 'heed to endless genealogies'.

Oz: Jimmy didn't provide the evidence to demonstrate that AV had used 'endless genealogies' in his statement from Luke 3. Oz provided evidence that Jimmy should have given to show that Jimmy's own question was irrelevant because he provided no support for it.

Jimmy: He is asking the question, with the assumption that the meaning of 'endless genealogies' is self-evident. He assumed that AV, Oz and other people on CFnet know the meaning of 'endless genealogies'.

Jimmy, you are using erroneous reasoning. You have put up a question that indicates you know the meaning of 'endless genealogies', but you provided no defense for it to explain your understanding. Therefore, it is a logical fallacy that you used.

Oz
 
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
It's not a hypothesis anyone would pursue, because no one thinks humans evolved from chimpanzees. I think you need to learn a bit about the TOE before you attempt to debate it.
Imagine if you could show transitional fossils from Chimpanzee to human. Disproving ToE. Wow!
 
Reactions: Jimmy D
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
If there is no directed purpose, anyone can choose whatever morality they want to pursue and you and I have no reason for objection because there is no 'directed purpose in the universe' (your words).
Non sequitur

That's the logical conclusion of your purposeless worldview.
No, it isn't.
 
Upvote 0

Jimmy D

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2014
5,147
5,995
✟277,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Of course it's an ape, taxonomically so are we, but that doesn't mean it's our ancestor. If you don't understand these basic things I'm not sure these debates are for you.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jimmy D

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2014
5,147
5,995
✟277,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

No, it was a joke, maybe not a particularly funny one, but a few posts before that AV bought up the endless genealogies quote in reference to common descent. I am perfectly aware of what Paul was talking about thanks.

Good job at sucking the humour out it though.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,553
709
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟140,373.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Of course it's an ape, taxonomically so are we, but that doesn't mean it's our ancestor. If you don't understand these basic things I'm not sure these debates are for you.

So are you the expert in ToE (theory of evolution). Are you accusing me of being an ignoramus about ToE?
 
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,553
709
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟140,373.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Really? Since I have no idea what Spiritual Quotient is and how it's supposed to be measured, I just took a number at random.

I didn't use the term Spiritual Quotient. That was another poster!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.