- Jan 10, 2010
- 37,281
- 8,501
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
If one of them was a glass of wine Jesus created, you'll come to the wrong conclusion as to it's age.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If one of them was a glass of wine Jesus created, you'll come to the wrong conclusion as to it's age.I am looking out the window and I see plenty of stuff that can be tested.
I say that you are making it all up.
If one of them was a glass of wine Jesus created, you'll come to the wrong conclusion as to it's age.
Creationism and ID have their roots in Natural Theology. This was a philosophical idea from religion that predated the theory of evolution (and was widely accepted prior to Darwin, even Darwin was a proponent of it while onboard the Beagle but his observations after the conclusion of his voyage led him to realize it was erroneous). It was never based on evidence and was always based on a religious interpretation of the appearance of life and the earth. It hasn't progressed since the 1800's, and I don't think scientists expect it to. It's the equivalent to alchemy in a senseBeen away for a while, come back and see the same 'arguments' against evolution.
And it is always... ALWAYS... 'arguments' against evolution.
NEVER arguments FOR creation/ID.
Analogies to human activity, bible verses, 'problems' with evolution - none of these, not one of them, is evidence FOR creation or ID.
It is almost as if creationists have admitted to themselves, subconsciously, that they cannot actually offer any positive supporting evidence FOR their mere beliefs, and are content to simply attack 'the other.' This is true, whether the creationist is a one-line snark master, or a verbose citation and quote bombing autodidact.
That's how we evaluate the myths of all cultures.
A myth is simply a fact you choose to not believe.
Then perhaps you need a course on Creationism 101; as does the OP?I say that you are making it all up.
Do you think everything in the Iliad really happened?
Then perhaps you need a course on Creationism 101; as does the OP?
Anyone asking why there is no evidence for creation either doesn't understand creationism, doesn't understand evidence, or both.
Then I submit it's the nature of evidence you don't understand.I understand it just fine.
I claim the events in the Iliad actually happened"A myth is simply a fact you choose to not believe."--Sky Writing
That is exactly what you claimed.
I am going to be using 14C dating. What ratio of 14C/12C would this wine have, and why?
"A myth is simply a fact you choose to not believe."--Sky Writing
That is exactly what you claimed.
So all it takes to prove something is a myth is for enough people to label it as such? That means you accept the Bible as myth then?For one reason, because so many others claim it is fiction.
I would suggest you check out Reason to Believe's creation model, which does supply predictions.This is why their 'theory' can't make predictions about what we should be looking for.
So all it takes to prove something is a myth is for enough people to label it as such? That means you accept the Bible as myth then?
I would suggest you check out Reason to Believe's creation model, which does supply predictions.
Reasons To Believe : Origin-of-Life Predictions Face Off: Evolution vs. Biblical Creation
Reasons To Believe : Creation Model Passes Big Test
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?