Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then perhaps you need a course on Creationism 101; as does the OP?
Anyone asking why there is no evidence for creation either doesn't understand creationism, doesn't understand evidence, or both.
Then I submit it's the nature of evidence you don't understand.
If I'm not mistaken wouldn't a good argument or evidence against evolution point to creationism?
What other option would there be? Is there a third party? Its either creationism or evolution, right? If creationism is outside the realms of our science then science can neither prove or disprove it. therefor to make an argument for creationism would be to argue against evolution because evolution is in the realms of science.
You are being very disingenuous.
Your OP is quite provocatively untrue.
As for evidence that creation by God is true, we are surrounded by it.
Open your eyes and your mind to the truth of creation.
Not only the marvels of this planet and its life but also a wonderful universe of ever
revealing complexities.
I do not need to defend creation for it is a given truth, unfortunately not seen nor believed by
those that are blind.
No actually it is evolutionists who have a hard time defending their myths and fairytales that
all this came from nothing because it: could? wanted to? by chance?
The day evolutionists can show me some real tangible evidence that can prove the myth of
the evolution of life, species and myself, I will show you little green men on Mars.
You guys are so so righteous and smug.
Yet in the end you have no evidence.
After 200 years of Darwinism there is still no real tangible evidence for evolution.
Your "evidence" is still only supposition and a fanciful hypothesis at best.
At worst it is the deliberate and fraudulent manufacture of false science to give some
credence to a lie.
Nothing has changed since the Piltdown Man Hoax ... it still continues with another fraud 'Lucy'
Is there any other way to accept it?If you are implying that creationism is accepted on Faith alone, fine - that would make you the one honest creationist.
The absolute beauty and truth of the creation is that I and millions of others can actually know,
experience and interact with the Creator.
No, we do not venerate anything.I guess evolutionists can venerate the dead bones of Charles Darwin, but its not the same.
and there are many more. by the way: basiclaly we have only 2 options. so if we falsified one option (evolution) we left with creation.
First, I am not sure what you mean by "test".Every test for life from nonlife has failed and has been effectively falsified so testing is not your standard in the first place.
In the end show me the real evidence. Not just theory and speculation.
I want to see some real empirical observable transitional evidence
from non-life to life ... from simple to more complicated ... from unicellular to multicellular ...
from one species to another species... show me the evolution of the liver, the heart, the kidneys,
the cardio-vascular system, the central nervous system and our spinal cords, the pancreas ...
I wanna see it for myself. Then I'll believe.
Always with the excuses.
Apologetics Press - Of Apes and Men: Chromosome 2 in Humans and the Chimpanzee
There are problems with this explanation. First, this hypothesis openly assumes that the chromosomal fusion took place after humans supposedly split from the apes in the proposed evolutionary tree. Allegedly at some point in the past, a human ancestor’s DNA underwent a genetic fusion between two of its chromosomes. This event occurred in no other species. Does this provide evidence that humans share a common ancestor with apes? No.
Is there any other way to accept it?
Looks like evidence whiners are SOL* then, eh?No, since there is obviously no evidence for it, and no corroborating historical accounts for the miracles and sundry supernatural events depicted in the bible.
You should aviod them absolutist statements.OK, this is too much...
The fusion of chromosome 2 in humans is NOT and NEVER WAS presented as evidence that humans and chimps shared a common ancestor.
You should aviod them absolutist statements.
Chromosome fusion
Introduction
All great apes apart from man have 24 pairs of chromosomes. There is therefore a hypothesis that the common ancestor of all great apes had 24 pairs of chromosomes and that the fusion of two of the ancestor's chromosomes created chromosome 2 in humans. The evidence for this hypothesis is very strong.
I think a lot of the argument over the chromosome fusion had to do with some creationist claims that humans had to have been created with only 23 pairs of chromosomes. I've argued in the past with creationists that didn't believe that such a fusion was possible, even though there have even been a couple documented examples of modern humans with as few as 22 pairs of chromosomes.
In and of itself the fusion event doesn't explicitly 'prove' common ancestry. But it does explain how it's possible to go from 24 pairs down to 23 pairs of chromosomes.
You guys are so so righteous and smug.
Yet in the end you have no evidence.
Does not prove anything since you are guessing. To be fair there was no common ancestor in the first place. It is all fiction with no more basis in reality then winged Pegasis. The link was provided and i could add to them. Your link show an anonymous person. We don't know who he is or his medical history. It is not subject to scrutiny or independent investigation. It is all faith. No where near convincing. From the previous link.To be fair, humans could have been created with 24 pairs of chromosomes and then a chromosomal fusion happened after they were created. There is even a man with 22 pairs of chromosomes which came about through a very recent fusion:
The 44 Chromosome Man | Understanding Genetics
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?