• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why make excuses?

soulfinder

Active Member
Apr 8, 2007
94
13
Visit site
✟15,327.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Why do people try to hide from the truth?

Isn't it because they want to continue on doing the thigs they want, even though they know it's wroung?

Given all of the evidence against homosexuality, or any other sin, I have heard people twist the scripture, throw it out, rationalize, deny the scripture etc.

The truth is this:

Hebrews 4:12
For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

The word of God is the truth. When people hear the truth, they have three options:

1. Believe the truth, and walk accordingly.

2. Believe the truth, and walk contrarily.

3. Deny the truth, and hide from it.

If you consider the truth, and walk in it, then you will become wise.

If you ever want to know the truth, just ask JESUS, and He'll show you, although sometimes it is hard to accept.
 

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
The rationale:

"Since I am attracted to men = God condones it".

Well, there are men who have drives to rape, molest children, and get close to animals. It is all part of the fallen nature. Part of the world that the Apostles warned us about.

I wonder if some pedophiles came on here and started using the twisting of the same scriptures around to justify their sexual orientations, what the homosexuals would have to say to that ?
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The rationale:

"Since I am attracted to men = God condones it".

Well, there are men who have drives to rape, molest children, and get close to animals. It is all part of the fallen nature. Part of the world that the Apostles warned us about.

I wonder if some pedophiles came on here and started using the twisting of the same scriptures around to justify their sexual orientations, what the homosexuals would have to say to that ?
I would logically run them through the repercussions.

Firstly innocent children are being traumatised daily by those sickos, and secondly, there is no ways that sort of sexual action could be called loving.

Let's not get onto rape, I have a hate for rapists that I haven't told many people about. Last year my sister was raped 3 times. Let's not go there, the Word talks about forgiveness, but I'm not ready to get rid of this hate at the moment.

I think there's been a misunderstanding. At no time am I making "excuses". I know in my heart that God loves me for who I am. I know that if Jesus was walking on the earth today and I walked up to him, he'd ask me why I ever felt so bad about it. My posts are not me defending myself, my posts are in the hope that one day all Christians will realise the love of God for people like me.

On this forum I've been accused of reading things out of context, and I've been accused of twisting scripture around. I've been accused of being demonically oppressed and I've been accused of doing the work of Satan. Quite frankly, if I look at all the scriptures you guys bash me with, I see a common factor.

Take the word:

arsenokoites = SODOMY
arsenokoites = FILTH OF SODOMY
arsenokoites = lawless lust
arsenokoites = lust
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = carnal
arsenokoites = lawless intercourse
arsenokoites = shameless
arsenokoites = burning with insane love for boys
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = licentiousness
arsenokoites = co-habitors with males
arsenokoites = lusters after mankind

The only way they can all be correct is by assuming there is a common denominator in the intentions of them being written.

To look for a common denominator you also need to read scripture in context of the times the scriptures were written in. One can only come to the conclusion that the scriptures were referring to men who were having some kind of non-loving, non monogamous sexual relations with other types of men. "Lust" obviously relates to that. If you look at the story of Sodom. The modern definition of Sodomy is acts of anal intercourse involving both men and women, not only homosexuals, however some choose to relate it to homosexuals only. However too, I believe that the definition of Sodomy has changed over the years to correlate with a world view. If you look at the nature of the acts of Sodomy in Sodom, they too were acts of lust involving non loving non monogamous sexual desires. How would a person define those acts today? Surely not a loving monogamous relationship? Is it not perhaps a ritual which was common in those days that a superior male which show his dominance over a weaker male by raping him? Even if it were not that, you still have to look at the sentence where the Sodomites wanted to RAPE the angels. It didn't say that they wanted to have a loving monogamous relationship with them. They wanted to RAPE them.

Look at Leviticus?

You know that quite possibly they were having issues with pagans who worshipped the multiple gods of fertility cults.

One can ignore the fact that the passages are part of the purity laws for the priests and then forget that Jesus died for us so that he could wash us as white as snow instead. Then we might as well ignore the salvation that Jesus Christ brought to us thousands of years later.
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Just a thought:

A heterosexual has to fight the natural temptations to lust after women.

As a homosexual I have to fight the natural temptations to lust after men. I don't have temptations to lust after women.

I'm told on this forum now that I also have to fight the natural temptations to fall in love with another man.
 
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Firstly innocent children are being traumatised daily by those sickos, and secondly, there is no ways that sort of sexual action could be called loving

I believe the human body belongs to God. I believe that when the body is used in the wrong way, such as self abuse or homosexual sex, it is traumatizing the body. There is no way that sort of sexual action could be called loving.

The only way all of the definitions you provided for "arsenokoites" to be correct would be within the context of the commandments, most notably the one against adultery. Since same sex marriage (acknowledged by God) cannot occur, any homosexual acts between same sex partners is a grave sin.
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I believe the human body belongs to God. I believe that when the body is used in the wrong way, such as self abuse or homosexual sex, it is traumatizing the body. There is no way that sort of sexual action could be called loving.

The only way all of the definitions you provided for "arsenokoites" to be correct would be within the context of the commandments, most notably the one against adultery. Since same sex marriage (acknowledged by God) cannot occur, any homosexual acts between same sex partners is a grave sin.
I think many of us could argue with our personal experiences.

I agree that if you were to have homosexual sex, you would be traumatised, just like if I were to have sex with a woman.

I disagree that homosexual marriage cannot be acknowledged by God.

With regards to throwing the word adultery at me. My understanding is that adultery is when a married person decides to lust after somebody he or she is not married to?

The term originates not from adult, which is from Latin a-dolescere, to grow up, mature, a combination of a, "to", dolere, "work", and the processing combound sc), but from the Latin ad-ulterare (to commit adultery, adulterate/falsify, a combination of ad, "at", and ulter, "above", "beyond", "opposite", meaning "on the other side of the bond of marriage").
 
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I think many of us could argue with our personal experiences.

I agree that if you were to have homosexual sex, you would be traumatised, just like if I were to have sex with a woman.

I disagree that homosexual marriage cannot be acknowledged by God.

With regards to throwing the word adultery at me. My understanding is that adultery is when a married person decides to lust after somebody he or she is not married to?
Adultery is sex outside marriage, whether one is married or not. The point of marriage is to have and raise children, since that is impossible for same sex partners, no marriage exists.
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Adultery is sex outside marriage, whether one is married or not. The point of marriage is to have and raise children, since that is impossible for same sex partners, no marriage exists.
Having children is impossible for many husbands and wives too...
 
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I
I know that if Jesus was walking on the earth today and I walked up to him, he'd ask me why I ever felt so bad about it. ... On this forum I've been accused of reading things out of context, and I've been accused of twisting scripture around.

Okay, where in the Bible does Jesus walk up to the person leading a gay lifestyle and condone it ? Where is there even a valid example of this in the New testament or anywhere else in the Bible.

Where are all the homosexual couples in the Bible being held in high esteem in the Word inspired by the Holy Spirit ?
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Okay, where in the Bible does Jesus walk up to the person leading a gay lifestyle and condone it ? Where is there even a valid example of this in the New testament or anywhere else in the Bible.

Where are all the homosexual couples in the Bible being held in high esteem in the Word inspired by the Holy Spirit ?
Matthew 8:5
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
. . .On this forum I've been accused of reading things out of context, and I've been accused of twisting scripture around. I've been accused of being demonically oppressed and I've been accused of doing the work of Satan. Quite frankly, if I look at all the scriptures you guys bash me with, I see a common factor.

Take the word:

arsenokoites = SODOMY
arsenokoites = FILTH OF SODOMY
arsenokoites = lawless lust
arsenokoites = lust
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = carnal
arsenokoites = lawless intercourse
arsenokoites = shameless
arsenokoites = burning with insane love for boys
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = licentiousness
arsenokoites = co-habitors with males
arsenokoites = lusters after mankind

The only way they can all be correct is by assuming there is a common denominator in the intentions of them being written.

The only way they can all be correct is by assuming there is a common denominator in the intentions of them being written.

If you do not like being told you are quoting/reading out of context then why do you continue to do it although I have called you on this before?

What you have quoted above is taken OUT-OF-CONTEXT from my posts. That is NOT what I said! Here is what I said exactly. Read through this and show me where I said each and every word, standing alone, without regard to its immediate context and the context of other contemporary writing, means arsenokoites, in and of itself?' I did NOT say that, I told you I did NOT say that, so this post is deliberate twisting and misrepresentation of the truth.

You want to talk about historical context,. here is the historical context? NOT one mention of pagan religions, temple prostitution, etc.

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

The early church interpreted [size=+1]&#945;&#961;&#963;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#954;&#959;&#953;&#964;&#951;&#962;[/size]/arsenokoités variously as, “”sodomy,” “filth of sodomy,” lawless lust, “lust,” “impurity,” “works of the flesh,” “carnal,” “lawless intercourse,” “shameless,” “burning with insane love for boys,” “licentiousness,” “co-habitors with males,” “lusters after mankind”, etc.

The above quoted from; Ignatius, 30-107 AD; Polycarp 65 - 155 AD; Irenaeus, 120-202 AD; Theophilus, 115 - 181 AD; Clement of Alexandria, 153 - 217 AD; Tertullian, 145-220 AD; Cyprian, 200-258 AD; and Origen, 185-254 AD.

Note the dates of these writings extend from ca. 50 AD through 258 AD, more than 250 years.
Epistle Of Ignatius [Disciple of John] To The Ephesians [A.D. 30-107.]

But as to the practice of magic, or the impure love of boys, or murder, it is superfluous to write to you, since such vices are forbidden to be committed even by the Gentiles. I do not issue commands on these points as if I were an apostle; but, as your fellow-servant, I put you in mind of them.

Epistle of Polycarp [Disciple of John] to the Philippians Chapter V.-The Duties of Deacons, Youths, and Virgins. [65 - 155 AD]

They must not be slanderers, double-tongued, or lovers of money, but temperate in all things, compassionate, industrious, walking according to the truth of the Lord, who was the servant of all. If we please Him in this present world, we shall receive also the future world, according as He has promised to us that He will raise us again from the dead, and that if we live worthily of Him, "we shall also reign together with Him," provided only we believe. In like manner, let the young men also be blameless in all things, being especially careful to preserve purity, and keeping themselves in, as with a bridle, from every kind of evil. For it is well that they should be cut off from the lusts that are in the world, since "every lust warreth against the spirit; " and "neither fornicators, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, shall inherit the kingdom of God, [1 Cor 6:9] " nor those who do things inconsistent and unbecoming. Wherefore, it is needful to abstain from all these things, being subject to the presbyters and deacons, as unto God and Christ. The virgins also must walk in a blameless and pure conscience.

Irenaeus [Disciple of Polycarp]Against Heresies Book V [120-202 AD]

As, therefore, he who has gone forward to the better things, and has brought forth the fruit of the Spirit, is saved altogether because of the communion of the Spirit; so also he who has continued in the aforesaid works of the flesh, being truly reckoned as carnal, because he did not receive the Spirit of God, shall not have power to inherit the kingdom of heaven. As, again, "the same apostle testifies, saying to the Corinthians, Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not err," he says: "neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor revilers, nor rapacious persons, shall inherit the kingdom of God [1 Cor 6:9]. And these ye indeed have been; but ye have been washed, but ye have been sanctified, but ye have been justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God." He shows in the clearest manner through what things it is that man goes to destruction, if he has continued to live after the flesh; and then, on the other hand, [he points out] through what things he is saved.

Since, therefore, in that passage [1 Cor 6:9] he recounts those works of the flesh which are without the Spirit, which bring death [upon their doers], he exclaimed at the end of his Epistle, in accordance with what he had already declared, "And as we have borne the image of him who is of the earth, we shall also bear the image of Him who is from heaven.

Theophilus to Autolycus Book III [115 - 181 AD]
Chapter VI.-Other Opinions of the Philosophers.


And regarding lawless conduct, those who have blindly wandered into the choir of philosophy have, almost to a man, spoken with one voice. Certainly Plato, to mention him first who seems to have been the most respectable philosopher among them, expressly, as it were, legislates in his first book,5 entitled The Republic, that the wives of all be common, using the precedent of the son6 of Jupiter and the lawgiver of the Cretans, in order that under this pretext there might be an abundant offspring from the best persons, and that those who were worn with toil might be comforted by such intercourse.7 And Epicurus himself, too, as well as teaching atheism, teaches along with it incest with mothers and sisters, and this in transgression of the laws which forbid it; for Solon distinctly legislated regarding this, in order that from a married parent children might lawfully spring, that they might not be born of adultery, so that no one should honour as his father him who was not his father, or dishonour him who was really his father, through ignorance that he was so. And these things the other laws of the Romans and Greeks also prohibit. Why, then, do Epicurus and the Stoics teach incest and sodomy, with which doctrines they have filled libraries, so that from boyhood this lawless intercourse is learned? And why should I further spend time on them, since even of those they call gods they relate similar things?

Clement of Alexandria The Instructor. [Paedagogus.] Book III [153 - 217 AD]

Such images of divine wisdom are many; but I shall mention one instance, and expound it in a few words. The fate of the Sodomites was judgment to those who had done wrong, instruction to those who hear. The Sodomites having, through much luxury, fallen into uncleanness, practicing adultery shamelessly, and burning with insane love for boys; the All-seeing Word, whose notice those who commit impieties cannot escape, cast His eye on them. Nor did the sleepless guard of humanity observe their licentiousness in silence; but dissuading us from the imitation of them, and training us up to His own temperance, and falling on some sinners, lest lust being unavenged, should break loose from all the restraints of fear, ordered Sodom to be burned, pouring forth a little of the sagacious fire on licentiousness; lest lust, through want of punishment, should throw wide the gates to those that were rushing into voluptuousness. Accordingly, the just punishment of the Sodomites became to men an image of the salvation which is well calculated for men. For those who have not committed like sins with those who are punished, will never receive a like punishment. By guarding against sinning, we guard against suffering.

Clement of Alexandria Exhortation To The Heathen

And what are the laws? “Thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not seduce boys; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not bear false witness; thou shalt love the Lord thy God.” And the complements of these are those laws of reason and words of sanctity which are inscribed on men’s hearts: “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself; to him who strikes thee on the cheek, present also the other;” “thou shalt not lust, for by lust alone thou hast committed adultery.”

Clement of Alexandria The Instructor [Paedagogus] Book 1

But life has reached this pitch of licentiousness through the wantonness of wickedness, and lasciviousness is diffused over the cities, having become law. Beside them women stand in the stews, offering their own flesh for hire for lewd pleasure, and boys, taught to deny their sex, act the part of women. Luxury has deranged all things; it has disgraced man. A luxurious niceness seeks everything, attempts everything, forces everything, coerces nature. Men play the part of women, and women that of men, contrary to nature; women are at once wives and husbands: no passage is closed against libidinousness; and their promiscuous lechery is a public institution, and luxury is domesticated. O miserable spectacle! horrible conduct! Such are the trophies of your social licentiousness which are exhibited: the evidence of these deeds are the prostitutes. Alas for such wickedness!

Tertullian On Modesty [145-220 AD]
Chapter XVI.-General Consistency of the Apostle.


Come, now; who in the world has (ever) redintegrated one who has been "marred" by God (that is, delivered to Satan with a view to destruction of the flesh), after subjoining for that reason, "Let none seduce himself; " that is, let none presume that one "marred" by God can possibly be redintegrated anew? Just as, again, among all other crimes-nay, even before all others-when affirming that "adulterers, and fornicators, and effeminates, and co-habitors with males, will not attain the kingdom of God, [1 Cor 6:9]" he premised, "Do not err" -to wit, if you think they will attain it. But to them from whom "the kingdom" is taken away, of course the life which exists in the kingdom is not permitted either. Moreover, by superadding, "But such indeed ye have been; but ye have received ablution, but ye have been sanctified, in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God; " in as far as he puts on the paid side of the account such sins before baptism, in so far after baptism he determines them irremissible, if it is true, (as it is), that they are not allowed to "receive ablution" anew.
Tertullian The Chaplet, or De Corona. Chapter VI.
Demanding then a law of God, you have that common one [law] prevailing all over the world, engraven on the natural tables to which the apostle too is wont to appeal, as when in respect. of the woman's veil he says, "Does not even Nature teach you? " -as when to the Romans, affirming that the heathen do by nature those things which the law requires, he suggests both natural law and a law-revealing nature. Yes, and also in the first chapter of the epistle [Rom 1.] he authenticates nature, when he asserts that males and females changed among themselves the natural use of the creature into that which is unnatural, by way of penal retribution for their error. [Rom 1:27]

Cyprian Treatise XII Three Books of Testimonies Against the Jews [200-258 AD]

65.
That all sins are put away in baptism.
In the first Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians: "Neither fornicators, nor those who serve idols, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor the lusters after mankind, nor thieves, nor cheaters, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers, shall obtain the kingdom of God [1 Cor 6:9][/b]. And these things indeed ye were: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God."

Origen Against Celsus Book 8 [185-254 AD]

and that they often exhibit in their character a high degree of gravity, of purity, and
integrity; while those who call themselves wise have despised these virtues, and have wallowed in the filth of sodomy, in lawless lust, “men with men working that which is unseemly.” [Rom 1:27]
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
If you do not like being told you are quoting/reading out of context then why do you continue to do it although I have called you on this before?

What you have quoted above is taken OUT-OF-CONTEXT from my posts. That is NOT what I said! Here is what I said exactly. Read through this and show me where I said each and every word, standing alone, without regard to its immediate context and the context of other contemporary writing, means arsenokoites, in and of itself?' I did NOT say that, I told you I did NOT say that, so this post is deliberate twisting and misrepresentation of the truth.

You want to talk about historical context,. here is the historical context? NOT one mention of pagan religions, temple prostitution, etc.

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

The early church interpreted [size=+1]&#945;&#961;&#963;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#954;&#959;&#953;&#964;&#951;&#962;[/size]/arsenokoités variously as, “”sodomy,” “filth of sodomy,” lawless lust, “lust,” “impurity,” “works of the flesh,” “carnal,” “lawless intercourse,” “shameless,” “burning with insane love for boys,” “licentiousness,” “co-habitors with males,” “lusters after mankind”, etc.

The above quoted from; Ignatius, 30-107 AD; Polycarp 65 - 155 AD; Irenaeus, 120-202 AD; Theophilus, 115 - 181 AD; Clement of Alexandria, 153 - 217 AD; Tertullian, 145-220 AD; Cyprian, 200-258 AD; and Origen, 185-254 AD.

Note the dates of these writings extend from ca. 50 AD through 258 AD, more than 250 years.
Epistle Of Ignatius [Disciple of John] To The Ephesians [A.D. 30-107.]

But as to the practice of magic, or the impure love of boys, or murder, it is superfluous to write to you, since such vices are forbidden to be committed even by the Gentiles. I do not issue commands on these points as if I were an apostle; but, as your fellow-servant, I put you in mind of them.

Epistle of Polycarp [Disciple of John] to the Philippians Chapter V.-The Duties of Deacons, Youths, and Virgins. [65 - 155 AD]

They must not be slanderers, double-tongued, or lovers of money, but temperate in all things, compassionate, industrious, walking according to the truth of the Lord, who was the servant of all. If we please Him in this present world, we shall receive also the future world, according as He has promised to us that He will raise us again from the dead, and that if we live worthily of Him, "we shall also reign together with Him," provided only we believe. In like manner, let the young men also be blameless in all things, being especially careful to preserve purity, and keeping themselves in, as with a bridle, from every kind of evil. For it is well that they should be cut off from the lusts that are in the world, since "every lust warreth against the spirit; " and "neither fornicators, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, shall inherit the kingdom of God, [1 Cor 6:9] " nor those who do things inconsistent and unbecoming. Wherefore, it is needful to abstain from all these things, being subject to the presbyters and deacons, as unto God and Christ. The virgins also must walk in a blameless and pure conscience.

Irenaeus [Disciple of Polycarp]Against Heresies Book V [120-202 AD]

As, therefore, he who has gone forward to the better things, and has brought forth the fruit of the Spirit, is saved altogether because of the communion of the Spirit; so also he who has continued in the aforesaid works of the flesh, being truly reckoned as carnal, because he did not receive the Spirit of God, shall not have power to inherit the kingdom of heaven. As, again, "the same apostle testifies, saying to the Corinthians, Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not err," he says: "neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor revilers, nor rapacious persons, shall inherit the kingdom of God [1 Cor 6:9]. And these ye indeed have been; but ye have been washed, but ye have been sanctified, but ye have been justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God." He shows in the clearest manner through what things it is that man goes to destruction, if he has continued to live after the flesh; and then, on the other hand, [he points out] through what things he is saved.

Since, therefore, in that passage [1 Cor 6:9] he recounts those works of the flesh which are without the Spirit, which bring death [upon their doers], he exclaimed at the end of his Epistle, in accordance with what he had already declared, "And as we have borne the image of him who is of the earth, we shall also bear the image of Him who is from heaven.

Theophilus to Autolycus Book III [115 - 181 AD]
Chapter VI.-Other Opinions of the Philosophers.


And regarding lawless conduct, those who have blindly wandered into the choir of philosophy have, almost to a man, spoken with one voice. Certainly Plato, to mention him first who seems to have been the most respectable philosopher among them, expressly, as it were, legislates in his first book,5 entitled The Republic, that the wives of all be common, using the precedent of the son6 of Jupiter and the lawgiver of the Cretans, in order that under this pretext there might be an abundant offspring from the best persons, and that those who were worn with toil might be comforted by such intercourse.7 And Epicurus himself, too, as well as teaching atheism, teaches along with it incest with mothers and sisters, and this in transgression of the laws which forbid it; for Solon distinctly legislated regarding this, in order that from a married parent children might lawfully spring, that they might not be born of adultery, so that no one should honour as his father him who was not his father, or dishonour him who was really his father, through ignorance that he was so. And these things the other laws of the Romans and Greeks also prohibit. Why, then, do Epicurus and the Stoics teach incest and sodomy, with which doctrines they have filled libraries, so that from boyhood this lawless intercourse is learned? And why should I further spend time on them, since even of those they call gods they relate similar things?

Clement of Alexandria The Instructor. [Paedagogus.] Book III [153 - 217 AD]

Such images of divine wisdom are many; but I shall mention one instance, and expound it in a few words. The fate of the Sodomites was judgment to those who had done wrong, instruction to those who hear. The Sodomites having, through much luxury, fallen into uncleanness, practicing adultery shamelessly, and burning with insane love for boys; the All-seeing Word, whose notice those who commit impieties cannot escape, cast His eye on them. Nor did the sleepless guard of humanity observe their licentiousness in silence; but dissuading us from the imitation of them, and training us up to His own temperance, and falling on some sinners, lest lust being unavenged, should break loose from all the restraints of fear, ordered Sodom to be burned, pouring forth a little of the sagacious fire on licentiousness; lest lust, through want of punishment, should throw wide the gates to those that were rushing into voluptuousness. Accordingly, the just punishment of the Sodomites became to men an image of the salvation which is well calculated for men. For those who have not committed like sins with those who are punished, will never receive a like punishment. By guarding against sinning, we guard against suffering.

Clement of Alexandria Exhortation To The Heathen

And what are the laws? “Thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not seduce boys; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not bear false witness; thou shalt love the Lord thy God.” And the complements of these are those laws of reason and words of sanctity which are inscribed on men’s hearts: “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself; to him who strikes thee on the cheek, present also the other;” “thou shalt not lust, for by lust alone thou hast committed adultery.”

Clement of Alexandria The Instructor [Paedagogus] Book 1

But life has reached this pitch of licentiousness through the wantonness of wickedness, and lasciviousness is diffused over the cities, having become law. Beside them women stand in the stews, offering their own flesh for hire for lewd pleasure, and boys, taught to deny their sex, act the part of women. Luxury has deranged all things; it has disgraced man. A luxurious niceness seeks everything, attempts everything, forces everything, coerces nature. Men play the part of women, and women that of men, contrary to nature; women are at once wives and husbands: no passage is closed against libidinousness; and their promiscuous lechery is a public institution, and luxury is domesticated. O miserable spectacle! horrible conduct! Such are the trophies of your social licentiousness which are exhibited: the evidence of these deeds are the prostitutes. Alas for such wickedness!

Tertullian On Modesty [145-220 AD]
Chapter XVI.-General Consistency of the Apostle.


Come, now; who in the world has (ever) redintegrated one who has been "marred" by God (that is, delivered to Satan with a view to destruction of the flesh), after subjoining for that reason, "Let none seduce himself; " that is, let none presume that one "marred" by God can possibly be redintegrated anew? Just as, again, among all other crimes-nay, even before all others-when affirming that "adulterers, and fornicators, and effeminates, and co-habitors with males, will not attain the kingdom of God, [1 Cor 6:9]" he premised, "Do not err" -to wit, if you think they will attain it. But to them from whom "the kingdom" is taken away, of course the life which exists in the kingdom is not permitted either. Moreover, by superadding, "But such indeed ye have been; but ye have received ablution, but ye have been sanctified, in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God; " in as far as he puts on the paid side of the account such sins before baptism, in so far after baptism he determines them irremissible, if it is true, (as it is), that they are not allowed to "receive ablution" anew.
Tertullian The Chaplet, or De Corona. Chapter VI.
Demanding then a law of God, you have that common one [law] prevailing all over the world, engraven on the natural tables to which the apostle too is wont to appeal, as when in respect. of the woman's veil he says, "Does not even Nature teach you? " -as when to the Romans, affirming that the heathen do by nature those things which the law requires, he suggests both natural law and a law-revealing nature. Yes, and also in the first chapter of the epistle [Rom 1.] he authenticates nature, when he asserts that males and females changed among themselves the natural use of the creature into that which is unnatural, by way of penal retribution for their error. [Rom 1:27]

Cyprian Treatise XII Three Books of Testimonies Against the Jews [200-258 AD]

65.
That all sins are put away in baptism.
In the first Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians: "Neither fornicators, nor those who serve idols, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor the lusters after mankind, nor thieves, nor cheaters, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers, shall obtain the kingdom of God [1 Cor 6:9][/b]. And these things indeed ye were: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God."

Origen Against Celsus Book 8 [185-254 AD]

and that they often exhibit in their character a high degree of gravity, of purity, and
integrity; while those who call themselves wise have despised these virtues, and have wallowed in the filth of sodomy, in lawless lust, “men with men working that which is unseemly.” [Rom 1:27]

Thank you for confirming my post
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thank you for confirming my post

Thank you for confirming that you are intellectually incapable of reading, and comprehending anything, in context, that contradicts your biases, assumptions, and presuppositions without distorting and misrepresenting it.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Thank you for confirming that you are intellectually incapable of reading, and comprehending anything, in context, that contradicts your biases, assumptions, and presuppositions without distorting and misrepresenting it.
It isn't even about intellect but about a straight out disregard for the evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
To look for a common denominator you also need to read scripture in context of the times the scriptures were written in. [If so, why have you refused to do this, ignoring all historical evidence provided?] One can only come to the conclusion that the scriptures were referring to men who were having some kind of non-loving, non monogamous sexual relations with other types of men. [Evidence, documentation, substantiation, proof ?] "Lust" obviously relates to that. If you look at the story of Sodom. The modern definition of Sodomy is acts of anal intercourse involving both men and women, not only homosexuals, however some choose to relate it to homosexuals only. [Logical flip-flop. First you say] “read scripture in context of the times the scriptures were written in?][/b] [Now you want to say “modern definition”] However too, I believe that the definition of Sodomy has changed over the years to correlate with a world view. [Irrelevant! What did it mean to the Jews of Moses day, and the church of the first 3-4 centuries?] If you look at the nature of the acts of Sodomy in Sodom, they too were acts of lust involving non loving non monogamous sexual desires. [Read Jude 6, in context. “Outlaw porn” that began in the past and continued into the future?] How would a person define those acts today? Surely not a loving monogamous relationship? [Irrelevant! Read scripture in context of the times the scriptures were written in!] Is it not perhaps a ritual which was common in those days that a superior male which show his dominance over a weaker male by raping him? [Evidence, documentation, substantiation, proof ?] Even if it were not that, you still have to look at the sentence where the Sodomites wanted to RAPE the angels. It didn't say that they wanted to have a loving monogamous relationship with them. They wanted to RAPE them.

The Sodomite perverts did NOT complete the action against the angels.
Jud 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Jud 1:7 [size=+1]&#969;&#962; 5613 ADV &#963;&#959;&#948;&#959;&#956;&#945; 4670 N-NPN &#954;&#945;&#953; 2532 CONJ &#947;&#959;&#956;&#959;&#961;&#961;&#945; 1116 N-NSF &#954;&#945;&#953; 2532 CONJ &#945;&#953; 3588 T-NPF &#960;&#949;&#961;&#953; 4012 PREP &#945;&#965;&#964;&#945;&#962; 846 P-APF &#960;&#959;&#955;&#949;&#953;&#962; 4172 N-NPF &#964;&#959;&#957; 3588 T-ASM &#959;&#956;&#959;&#953;&#959;&#957; 3664 A-ASM &#964;&#959;&#965;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#962; 5125 D-DPM &#964;&#961;&#959;&#960;&#959;&#957; 5158 N-ASM &#949;&#954;&#960;&#959;&#961;&#957;&#949;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#963;&#945;&#953; 1608 V-AAP-NPF &#954;&#945;&#953; 2532 CONJ &#945;&#960;&#949;&#955;&#952;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#953; 565 V-2AAP-NPF &#959;&#960;&#953;&#963;&#969; 3694 ADV &#963;&#945;&#961;&#954;&#959;&#962; 4561 N-GSF &#949;&#964;&#949;&#961;&#945;&#962; 2087 A-GSF &#960;&#961;&#959;&#954;&#949;&#953;&#957;&#964;&#945;&#953;4295 V-PNI-3P &#948;&#949;&#953;&#947;&#956;&#945;1164 N-ASN &#960;&#965;&#961;&#959;&#962;4442 N-GSN &#945;&#953;&#969;&#957;&#953;&#959;&#965;166 A-GSN &#948;&#953;&#954;&#951;&#957;1349 N-ASF &#965;&#960;&#949;&#967;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#953;5254 V-PAP-NPF [/size]​
The verbs translated “giving themselves over to fornication” and “going after” are AAP and 2AAP, respectively aorist, active, participle, an action began in the past continuing into the future. The Sodomite perverts did not complete the action against the angels and certainly did not do anything with any flesh afterward.

Look at Leviticus?

I have repeatedly addressed Leviticus, no homosexual posting on this forum, including you, has ever addressed my discussions of Leviticus.

You know that quite possibly they were having issues with pagans who worshipped the multiple gods of fertility cults. [”Possibly?” Evidence, documentation, substantiation, proof?]

If the mentions in Lev 18:22, 20:13 only refer to “issues with pagans” etc. why did the Jews NEVER make that distinction? The only people ever to claim that sodomy was only ritual/ceremonial uncleaness are 20th century homosexuals!

Talmud -- Sanhedrin 54a

MISHNAH. HE WHO COMMITS SODOMY WITH A MALE OR A BEAST, AND A WOMAN THAT COMMITS BESTIALITY ARE STONED
. . . . Our Rabbis taught: [If a man lieth also with mankind, as the lyings of a woman,29 both of them have committed on abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them,]. . .

Sanhedrin 54b

This teaches the punishment: whence do we derive the formal prohibition? — From the verse, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.1 From this we learn the formal prohibition for him who lies [with a male]: whence do we know a formal prohibition for the person who permits himself thus to be abused? — Scripture saith: There shall be no sodomite of the sons of Israel:2 and it is further said, . . .

Now, he who [actively] commits pederasty, and also [passively] permits himself to be thus abused — R. Abbahu said: On R. Ishmael's view, he is liable to two penalties, one [for the injunction] derived from thou shalt not lie with mankind, and the other for [violating the prohibition,] There shall not be a Sodomite of the sons of Israel. . . .

for there shall be no Sodomite applies to sodomy with mankind.13 . . .

He who submits both to pederasty and to bestiality — R. Abbahu said: On R. Akiba's view, he incurs two penalties; one for thou shalt not lie [with mankind], and the other for thou shalt not lie [with any beast]. But on R. Ishmael's view, he incurs only one punishment, both offences being derived from the single verse, There shall be no Sodomite.19 . . .

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

Jewish Encyclopedia - Dog

- The dog being an unclean animal, "the breaking of a dog's neck," mentioned as a sacrificial rite in Isa. lxvi. 3 (compare Ex. xiii. 13), indicates an ancient Canaanite practise (see W. R. Smith, "Rel. of Sem." p. 273). The shamelessness of the dog in regard to sexual life gave rise to the name ("dog") for the class of priests in the service of Astarte who practised sodomy ("kedeshim," called also by the Greeks &#954;&#965;&#957;&#945;&#943;&#948;&#959;&#953;, Deut. xxiii. 19 [A. V. 18]; compare ib. 18 [17] and Rev. xxii. 15; see Driver ad loc.), though as the regular name of priests attached to the temple of Ashtoret at Larnaca has been found on the monuments (see "C. I. S." i., No. 86).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=415&letter=D&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - Chastity

(e) The unnatural crimes against chastity, sodomy and pederasty, prevalent in heathendom, were strictly prohibited (Lev. xviii. 22, 23; xx. 13, 15, 16; Deut. xxvii. 21).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=386&letter=C&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - DIDACHE -

Dependence upon Jewish Custom.


A manual of instruction for proselytes, adopted from the Synagogue by early Christianity, and transformed by alteration and amplification into a Church manual.
2: "Thou shalt not commit adultery" (Ex. xx. 14). (This includes: "Thou shalt not commit sodomy nor fornication.") "Thou shalt not steal" (Ex. xx. 15). . . . "Thou shalt not use witchcraft nor practise sorcery" (Ex. xxii. 18; Lev. xix. 26).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=341&letter=D&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - Crime

On the analogy of this Biblical case the Rabbis decide several others (see Burglary). In three cases the person on the point of committing a crime may be killed: where he pursues a neighbor in order to kill him; where he pursues a male to commit sodomy; and where he seeks to ravish a betrothed damsel; for Deut. xxii. 27 indicates the duty of all that hear her cry to help her.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=301&letter=L&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - The 613 Commandments,: 3347-53.

Adultery, sodomy, etc. Lev. Xviii. 7, 14, 20, 22, 23.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=689&letter=C&search=sodomy

One can ignore the fact that the passages are part of the purity laws for the priests and then forget that Jesus died for us so that he could wash us as white as snow instead. Then we might as well ignore the salvation that Jesus Christ brought to us thousands of years later.

Rubbish! The penalty for ritual/ceremonial uncleaness was to wash and the person would be clean at the evening. In a few cases, such as touching a dead body or a woman's menstrual cycle, the uncleaness lasted 7 days.
Lev 11:24, 11:25, 11:27, 11:31, 11:32, 11:39, 11:40 (7x), Lev 14:46 (1 x), Lev 15:5, 15:6, 15:7, 15:8, 15:10, 15:11, 15:16, 15:17, 15:18, 15:19, 15:21, 15:22, 15:23, 15:27, (14x), Lev 17:15 (1 x), Lev 22:6 (1 x) Num 19:7, 19:8, 19:10, 19:21, 19:22 (5x) (Total 29 x)

Num 19:11 unclean seven days.; 19:14, 19:16, 19:19 (4 x)​

The penalty for CRIMES like murder, rape, blasphemy, and sodomy was death.
Jewish Encyclopedia- Capital Punishment.

—In the Pentateuch:


Warrants for the infliction of capital punishment, as opposed to private retribution or vengeance, are found in the Pentateuchal codes for the commission of any one of the following crimes:
1. adultery (Lev. xx. 10; Deut. xxii. 22);
2. bestiality (Ex. xxii. 18 [A. V. 19]; Lev. xx. 15);
3. blasphemy (Lev. xxiv. 16);
4. false evidence in capital cases (Deut. xix. 16-19);
5. false prophecy (Deut. xiii. 6, xviii. 20);
6. idolatry, actual or virtual (Lev. xx. 2; Deut. xiii. 7-19, xvii. 2-7);
7. incestuous or unnatural connections (Lev. xviii. 22, xx. 11-14);
8. insubordination to supreme authority (Deut. xvii. 12);
9. kidnapping (Ex. xxi. 16; Deut. xxiv. 7);
10. licentiousness of a priest's daughter (Lev. xxi. 9);
11. murder (Ex. xxi. 12; Lev. xxiv. 17; Num. xxxv. 16 et seq.);
12. rape committed on a betrothed woman (Deut. xxii. 25);
13. striking or cursing a parent, or otherwise rebelling against parental authority (Ex. xxi. 15, 17; Lev. xx. 9; Deut. xxi. 18-21);
14. Sabbath-breaking (Ex. xxxi. 14, xxxv. 2; Num. xv. 32-36);
15. witchcraft and augury (Ex. xxii. 17; Lev. xx. 27).​

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=128&letter=C
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
It isn't even about intellect but about a straight out disregard for the evidence.
evidence?

I don't know if I am missing the point with those passages.

If you read what I posted, in no possible way does it contradict anything in his post. What's the difference between:

arsenokoites = SODOMY
arsenokoites = FILTH OF SODOMY
arsenokoites = lawless lust
arsenokoites = lust
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = carnal
arsenokoites = lawless intercourse
arsenokoites = shameless
arsenokoites = burning with insane love for boys
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = licentiousness
arsenokoites = co-habitors with males
arsenokoites = lusters after mankind

and "
The early church interpreted [SIZE=+1]&#945;&#961;&#963;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#954;&#959;&#953;&#964;&#951;&#962;[/SIZE]/arsenokoités variously as, &#8220;&#8221;sodomy,&#8221; &#8220;filth of sodomy,&#8221; lawless lust, &#8220;lust,&#8221; &#8220;impurity,&#8221; &#8220;works of the flesh,&#8221; &#8220;carnal,&#8221; &#8220;lawless intercourse,&#8221; &#8220;shameless,&#8221; &#8220;burning with insane love for boys,&#8221; &#8220;licentiousness,&#8221; &#8220;co-habitors with males,&#8221; &#8220;lusters after mankind&#8221;, etc. "

???????


 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The Sodomite perverts did NOT complete the action against the angels.
Jud 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Jud 1:7 [size=+1]&#969;&#962; 5613 ADV &#963;&#959;&#948;&#959;&#956;&#945; 4670 N-NPN &#954;&#945;&#953; 2532 CONJ &#947;&#959;&#956;&#959;&#961;&#961;&#945; 1116 N-NSF &#954;&#945;&#953; 2532 CONJ &#945;&#953; 3588 T-NPF &#960;&#949;&#961;&#953; 4012 PREP &#945;&#965;&#964;&#945;&#962; 846 P-APF &#960;&#959;&#955;&#949;&#953;&#962; 4172 N-NPF &#964;&#959;&#957; 3588 T-ASM &#959;&#956;&#959;&#953;&#959;&#957; 3664 A-ASM &#964;&#959;&#965;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#962; 5125 D-DPM &#964;&#961;&#959;&#960;&#959;&#957; 5158 N-ASM &#949;&#954;&#960;&#959;&#961;&#957;&#949;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#963;&#945;&#953; 1608 V-AAP-NPF &#954;&#945;&#953; 2532 CONJ &#945;&#960;&#949;&#955;&#952;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#953; 565 V-2AAP-NPF &#959;&#960;&#953;&#963;&#969; 3694 ADV &#963;&#945;&#961;&#954;&#959;&#962; 4561 N-GSF &#949;&#964;&#949;&#961;&#945;&#962; 2087 A-GSF &#960;&#961;&#959;&#954;&#949;&#953;&#957;&#964;&#945;&#953;4295 V-PNI-3P &#948;&#949;&#953;&#947;&#956;&#945;1164 N-ASN &#960;&#965;&#961;&#959;&#962;4442 N-GSN &#945;&#953;&#969;&#957;&#953;&#959;&#965;166 A-GSN &#948;&#953;&#954;&#951;&#957;1349 N-ASF &#965;&#960;&#949;&#967;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#953;5254 V-PAP-NPF [/size]​
The verbs translated “giving themselves over to fornication” and “going after” are AAP and 2AAP, respectively aorist, active, participle, an action began in the past continuing into the future. The Sodomite perverts did not complete the action against the angels and certainly did not do anything with any flesh afterward.



I have repeatedly addressed Leviticus, no homosexual posting on this forum, including you, has ever addressed my discussions of Leviticus.



If the mentions in Lev 18:22, 20:13 only refer to “issues with pagans” etc. why did the Jews NEVER make that distinction? The only people ever to claim that sodomy was only ritual/ceremonial uncleaness are 20th century homosexuals!

Talmud -- Sanhedrin 54a

MISHNAH. HE WHO COMMITS SODOMY WITH A MALE OR A BEAST, AND A WOMAN THAT COMMITS BESTIALITY ARE STONED
. . . . Our Rabbis taught: [If a man lieth also with mankind, as the lyings of a woman,29 both of them have committed on abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them,]. . .

Sanhedrin 54b

This teaches the punishment: whence do we derive the formal prohibition? — From the verse, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.1 From this we learn the formal prohibition for him who lies [with a male]: whence do we know a formal prohibition for the person who permits himself thus to be abused? — Scripture saith: There shall be no sodomite of the sons of Israel:2 and it is further said, . . .

Now, he who [actively] commits pederasty, and also [passively] permits himself to be thus abused — R. Abbahu said: On R. Ishmael's view, he is liable to two penalties, one [for the injunction] derived from thou shalt not lie with mankind, and the other for [violating the prohibition,] There shall not be a Sodomite of the sons of Israel. . . .

for there shall be no Sodomite applies to sodomy with mankind.13 . . .

He who submits both to pederasty and to bestiality — R. Abbahu said: On R. Akiba's view, he incurs two penalties; one for thou shalt not lie [with mankind], and the other for thou shalt not lie [with any beast]. But on R. Ishmael's view, he incurs only one punishment, both offences being derived from the single verse, There shall be no Sodomite.19 . . .

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

Jewish Encyclopedia - Dog

- The dog being an unclean animal, "the breaking of a dog's neck," mentioned as a sacrificial rite in Isa. lxvi. 3 (compare Ex. xiii. 13), indicates an ancient Canaanite practise (see W. R. Smith, "Rel. of Sem." p. 273). The shamelessness of the dog in regard to sexual life gave rise to the name ("dog") for the class of priests in the service of Astarte who practised sodomy ("kedeshim," called also by the Greeks &#954;&#965;&#957;&#945;&#943;&#948;&#959;&#953;, Deut. xxiii. 19 [A. V. 18]; compare ib. 18 [17] and Rev. xxii. 15; see Driver ad loc.), though as the regular name of priests attached to the temple of Ashtoret at Larnaca has been found on the monuments (see "C. I. S." i., No. 86).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=415&letter=D&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - Chastity

(e) The unnatural crimes against chastity, sodomy and pederasty, prevalent in heathendom, were strictly prohibited (Lev. xviii. 22, 23; xx. 13, 15, 16; Deut. xxvii. 21).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=386&letter=C&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - DIDACHE -

Dependence upon Jewish Custom.


A manual of instruction for proselytes, adopted from the Synagogue by early Christianity, and transformed by alteration and amplification into a Church manual.
2: "Thou shalt not commit adultery" (Ex. xx. 14). (This includes: "Thou shalt not commit sodomy nor fornication.") "Thou shalt not steal" (Ex. xx. 15). . . . "Thou shalt not use witchcraft nor practise sorcery" (Ex. xxii. 18; Lev. xix. 26).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=341&letter=D&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - Crime

On the analogy of this Biblical case the Rabbis decide several others (see Burglary). In three cases the person on the point of committing a crime may be killed: where he pursues a neighbor in order to kill him; where he pursues a male to commit sodomy; and where he seeks to ravish a betrothed damsel; for Deut. xxii. 27 indicates the duty of all that hear her cry to help her.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=301&letter=L&search=sodomy

Jewish Encyclopedia - The 613 Commandments,: 3347-53.

Adultery, sodomy, etc. Lev. Xviii. 7, 14, 20, 22, 23.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=689&letter=C&search=sodomy



Rubbish! The penalty for ritual/ceremonial uncleaness was to wash and the person would be clean at the evening. In a few cases, such as touching a dead body or a woman's menstrual cycle, the uncleaness lasted 7 days.
Lev 11:24, 11:25, 11:27, 11:31, 11:32, 11:39, 11:40 (7x), Lev 14:46 (1 x), Lev 15:5, 15:6, 15:7, 15:8, 15:10, 15:11, 15:16, 15:17, 15:18, 15:19, 15:21, 15:22, 15:23, 15:27, (14x), Lev 17:15 (1 x), Lev 22:6 (1 x) Num 19:7, 19:8, 19:10, 19:21, 19:22 (5x) (Total 29 x)

Num 19:11 unclean seven days.; 19:14, 19:16, 19:19 (4 x)​

The penalty for CRIMES like murder, rape, blasphemy, and sodomy was death.
Jewish Encyclopedia- Capital Punishment.

—In the Pentateuch:


Warrants for the infliction of capital punishment, as opposed to private retribution or vengeance, are found in the Pentateuchal codes for the commission of any one of the following crimes:
1. adultery (Lev. xx. 10; Deut. xxii. 22);
2. bestiality (Ex. xxii. 18 [A. V. 19]; Lev. xx. 15);
3. blasphemy (Lev. xxiv. 16);
4. false evidence in capital cases (Deut. xix. 16-19);
5. false prophecy (Deut. xiii. 6, xviii. 20);
6. idolatry, actual or virtual (Lev. xx. 2; Deut. xiii. 7-19, xvii. 2-7);
7. incestuous or unnatural connections (Lev. xviii. 22, xx. 11-14);
8. insubordination to supreme authority (Deut. xvii. 12);
9. kidnapping (Ex. xxi. 16; Deut. xxiv. 7);
10. licentiousness of a priest's daughter (Lev. xxi. 9);
11. murder (Ex. xxi. 12; Lev. xxiv. 17; Num. xxxv. 16 et seq.);
12. rape committed on a betrothed woman (Deut. xxii. 25);
13. striking or cursing a parent, or otherwise rebelling against parental authority (Ex. xxi. 15, 17; Lev. xx. 9; Deut. xxi. 18-21);
14. Sabbath-breaking (Ex. xxxi. 14, xxxv. 2; Num. xv. 32-36);
15. witchcraft and augury (Ex. xxii. 17; Lev. xx. 27).​

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=128&letter=C
The earlier crimes referenced in Leviticus 18 (the nakedness crimes), are specifically identified as &#1494;&#1460;&#1502;&#1464;&#1468;&#1492; zimm&#257;. &#1514;&#1465;&#1468;&#1493;&#1506;&#1461;&#1489;&#1464;&#1492; "T&#333;&#699;&#275;&#7687;&#257;" is a word strictly concerning the sin of idolatry (Gen 43:32, 46:34, Exd 8:26, Deut 7:25, 13:12-14, et al). &#1494;&#1460;&#1502;&#1464;&#1468;&#1492; Zimm&#257; seems a more appropriate word to talk about sexual crimes (Lev 18:17, 19:29, 20:14, Judges 20:5-6, Jer 13:27, Eze 16:26-27, et al).
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
evidence?

I don't know if I am missing the point with those passages.

If you read what I posted, in no possible way does it contradict anything in his post. What's the difference between:

arsenokoites = SODOMY
arsenokoites = FILTH OF SODOMY
arsenokoites = lawless lust
arsenokoites = lust
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = carnal
arsenokoites = lawless intercourse
arsenokoites = shameless
arsenokoites = burning with insane love for boys
arsenokoites = impurity
arsenokoites = licentiousness
arsenokoites = co-habitors with males
arsenokoites = lusters after mankind

and " The early church interpreted &#945;&#961;&#963;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#954;&#959;&#953;&#964;&#951;&#962;/arsenokoités variously as, “”sodomy,” “filth of sodomy,” lawless lust, “lust,” “impurity,” “works of the flesh,” “carnal,” “lawless intercourse,” “shameless,” “burning with insane love for boys,” “licentiousness,” “co-habitors with males,” “lusters after mankind”, etc. "

???????

[SIZE=+1]READ THE CONTEXT![/SIZE] The word "yeah" literally means "yes." The word "right" literally means the opposite of "left," or "correct." Despite the literal meaning of the words, the phrase "Yeah, right" is usually "interpreted" as "I doubt or disbelieve what you are saying." But, "yeah" does NOT [SIZE=+1]=[/SIZE] "doubt." "Right" does NOT [SIZE=+1]=[/SIZE] "disblief."

In Biblical writing and in the early church there are frequent "figures of speech" such as "metonymy" and "synecdoche."
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,346
1,474
38
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟140,803.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Given all of the evidence against homosexuality
I've never seen any evidence against homosexuality. Only people stating their personal views and religious beliefs as if they were facts.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The earlier crimes referenced in Leviticus 18 (the nakedness crimes), are specifically identified as &#1494;&#1460;&#1502;&#1464;&#1468;&#1492; zimm&#257;. &#1514;&#1465;&#1468;&#1493;&#1506;&#1461;&#1489;&#1464;&#1492; "T&#333;&#699;&#275;&#7687;&#257;" is a word strictly concerning the sin of idolatry (Gen 43:32, 46:34, Exd 8:26, Deut 7:25, 13:12-14, et al). &#1494;&#1460;&#1502;&#1464;&#1468;&#1492; Zimm&#257; seems a more appropriate word to talk about sexual crimes (Lev 18:17, 19:29, 20:14, Judges 20:5-6, Jer 13:27, Eze 16:26-27, et al).

You know absolutely NOTHING about Hebrew grammar. I don't give a rats behind for what you think seems a more appropriate word. DO NOT even think about telling anyone what Hebrew words mean. You have ignored this several times.
Jewish Encyclopedia-Abomination
Rendering in the English versions of different Biblical terms denoting that which is loathed or detested on religious grounds and which, therefore, is utterly offensive to the Deity. These terms differ greatly in the degree of the abhorrence implied and should be distinguished in translation, as follows:

(1)
[size=+1]&#1514;&#1493;&#1506;&#1489;&#1492;[/size] (to'ebah):Abomination of the highest degree; originally that which offends the religious sense of a people. Thus (Gen. xliii. 32): "The Egyptians might not eat bread with the Hebrews; for that is an abomination unto the Egyptians." The reason is that the Hebrews, as foreigners, were considered an inferior caste. According to Herodotus, ii. 41, no Egyptian would kiss a Greek on the mouth, or use his dish, or even taste meat cut with a carving-knife belonging to a Greek. But especially as shepherds the Hebrews were "an abomination unto the Egyptians" (Gen. xlvi. 34). The eating of unclean animals is a religious offense called to'ebah: "Thou shalt not eat any abominable thing" (Deut. xiv. 3). This is the introduction to the laws prohibiting the use of unclean animals (see Clean and Unclean Animals). Still more offensive to the God of Israel is the practise of idolatry. The idol itself is called an Abomination: "for it is an abomination to the Lord thy God. Neither shalt thou bring an abomination into thine house and thus become a thing set apart [tabooed= [i]kherem[/i]] like unto it; thou shalt utterly detest it and utterly abhor it; for it is a thing set apart [tabooed]" (Deut. vii. 25, 26, Heb.): "Cursed be the man that maketh a graven or molten image, an abomination unto the Lord" (Deut. xxvii. 15). Often the word to'ebah is used for idol or heathen deity; for instance, in Isa. xliv. 19; Deut. xxxii. 16; II Kings, xxiii. 13, and especially Ex. viii. 22 (26, A. V.), it is to be taken in this sense. When Pharaoh had told the Israelites to offer sacrifices to their God in Egypt, Moses replied: "How may we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians [that is, the kind of animals worshiped by them] before their eyes, and they not stone us?" (see Ibn Ezra, ad loc.).

All idolatrous practise is an Abomination because of its defiling character: "Every abomination to the Lord which he hateth have they done unto their gods" (Deut. xii. 31; compare Deut. xiii. 15, xvii. 4, xx. 18). Also magic and divination are an Abomination (Deut. xviii. 12). Sexual transgression is particularly denounced as an Abomination (to'ebah) (Deut. xxii. 5, xxiii. 19 [18, A. V.], xxiv. 4); especially incest and unnatural offenses (Lev. xviii. and xx.): "For all these abominations have the men of the land done who were before you, and the land became defiled; lest the land vomit you out also when ye defile it" (Lev. xviii. 27, 28, Heb.; compare also Ezek. viii. 15 and elsewhere).

But the word to'ebah also assumes a higher spiritual meaning and is applied also to moral iniquities: "Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small. . . For all that do such things, and all that do unrighteously, are an abomination unto the Lord thy God" (Deut. xxv. 14-16). In the same strain we are taught that "lying lips" (Prov. xii. 22), "the perverse" (ib. iii. 32, R.V.) the "proud in heart" (ib. xvi. 5), "the way of the wicked" (ib. xv. 9), "thoughts of evil" (ib. xv. 26, Heb.), and "he that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the righteous" (ib. xvii. 15) are an Abomination. "These six things doth the Lord hate, yea, seven things are an abomination to him: haughty eyes; a lying tongue; hands that shed innocent blood; a heart that deviseth wicked imaginations; feet that be swift in running to mischief; a false witness that uttereth lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren" (ib. vi. 16-19, Heb.). In another direction the prohibition of an abominable thing is given an ethical meaning: "Thou shalt not sacrifice unto the Lord thy God an ox or a sheep wherein is a blemish, for that is an abomination unto the Lord thy God" (Deut. xvii. 1, Heb.). Here the physical character of the sacrifice is offensive. But prophet and sage declare that any sacrifice without purity of motive is an Abomination: "Bring no more an oblation of falsehood—an incense of abomination it is to me" (Isa. i. 13, Heb.; compare Jer. vii. 10). "The sacrifice of the wicked" (Prov. xv. 8, xxi. 27) and the prayer of "him that turneth his ear from hearing the law" (Prov. xxviii. 9, Heb.) are an Abomination.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=352&letter=A
 
Upvote 0