Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How can you use "human level intelligence" as a part of your definition of human?I, a creationist, define human according to properties given by God. For a living human: a life who can tell good from evil. For a dead human: those who are able to link to human-level intelligence.
This definition is much better, more clear and more useful than those used by evolutionist.
No. I've already decided to stop arguing this topic with people who've pre-decided that a theological commitment will trump any evidence or reasoning. Its like going down a "flat-earth" rabbit hole.For those who are deceived, they are not trying to protect anything.
For those who are not deceived, there is no need to protect anything.
For those who are not sure about what evolution is, I attack it to show them the deception.
If you are not so faithful to evolution yet, do you want to hear some my logic/scientific attacks to it?
I, a creationist, define human according to properties given by God. For a living human: a life who can tell good from evil. For a dead human: those who are able to link to human-level intelligence.
This definition is much better, more clear and more useful than those used by evolutionist.
Renders it impossible, promoted by deluded charlatans.And that has what to do with the theory of evolution?
Renders it impossible, promoted by deluded charlatans.
I dont think so. All the vast evidence for TOE would still be there. You would have simply identified a different type of evolution at work in whatever rare case it applies to.If something ever evolved from nothing all of us who have studied the TOE would have to give it up.
Good point.I dont think so. All the vast evidence for TOE would still be there. You would have simply identified a different type of evolution at work in whatever rare case it applies to.
So like a person with severe mental issues or dementai arnt human??
How can you use "human level intelligence" as a part of your definition of human?
No. I've already decided to stop arguing this topic with people who've pre-decided that a theological commitment will trump any evidence or reasoning. Its like going down a "flat-earth" rabbit hole.
When scientists who actually work in this field find evidence to cause some re-thinking, then I'm all ears.
So, apparently a human infant is not human. Good thing they won't be able to understand you when you tell them so.
Good thought and tricky argument. But it has logic problem.
“human infant”, why do you need the word “human” to describe it? Or the word “infant” itself has the meaning of human infant? Would you call baby dog as “infant”?
I am not sure if an infant can tell good from evil subconsciously, but all human treat infant as human. There must be a good reason to it.
Science's definition of human includes infants...just sayin
What about populations with the intelligence to utilise those techniques, but just never happened to develop them on any large scale?That is a good question. I can not give an inclusive definition. But I can give many examples, such as raise fire, wear clothes, drill holes, etc.
Seems like a serious oversight. I think your definition of human is probably non feasible if it creates situations where part of a single family is human and part is not.No definition of any life includes infant.
Not sure why.
There have been examples of body component evolving toward simplicity, and complex parts going away altogether.It is not easy to find “evidence” to show that evolution does not work. But it is pretty easy to give example on things evolution never works. An example is what I talked about the idea of “backward evolution”. It should happen, but we have never seen it.
What about populations with the intelligence to utilise those techniques, but just never happened to develop them on any large scale?
There have been examples of body component evolving toward simplicity, and complex parts going away altogether.
Or do you mean something else?
???I mean the direction of evolution synchronized to environmental change. Applied to your example, we should see some components (functions) became simpler, then at some other times, also became more complicated.
???
We absolutely see that. Eyes evolving away as species move to dark habitats, and so on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?