Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Luke 16...Jesus' SERMON
1. Lazarus dies and is carried into Abraham's bosom. By the phrase, Abraham's bosom, an allusion is made to the custom at Jewish feasts, when three persons reclining on their left elbows on a couch, the person whose head came near the breast of the other, was said to lie in his bosom. So it is said of the beloved disciple, John 13:25. Abraham's bosom was a phrase used among the Jews to signify the paradise of God. See Josephus's account of the Maccabees, chap. xiii.
https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/acc/luke-16.html
There are actually 4 persons mentioned.Read actual parables and then read this story. This doesn't sound anything like a parable, not to mention it is never called one and no parable ever has a person's actual name because parables are general things of truth with no specific people in them but this one is extremely specific. I believe the rich man and Lazarus were two very real people and two very real fates used to warn the rest of us.
Really? You don't think the idea of looking up from hell to see Father Abraham is figurative? If I were going to tell a story like that I'd use St. Peter at the pearly gates. I certainly wouldn't intend that to be taken literally.Your not going to get a parable from the description of the Rich Man and Lazarus, because there is no figurative language.
Your not Jesus Christ.Really? You don't think the idea of looking up from hell to see Father Abraham is figurative? If I were going to tell a story like that I'd use St. Peter at the pearly gates. I certainly wouldn't intend that to be taken literally.
My question is: where is the Rich Man?Luke 16:24
And he shouting said--Father Abraham! be thou merciful to me! and send Lazarus!
that he should be dipping the tip of the finger of him of water, and should be cooling down the tongue of me,
--that I am being pained in this, the flame/phlox<5395>
He is no where.My question is: where is the Rich Man?
Too easy of a cop out.He is no where.
E.W.Bullinger and others showed perfectly that Jesus was just using the religious leaders own beliefs in a story to show them/ to embarrass them, that what they believed was false. It has often been mis-translated as if it was a parable or a real event, which then, if it was, would contradict much Scripture.
No cop out. I thought you meant if he had actually lived.Too easy of a cop out.
Even if it is a parable....Where is he?
That was on purpose an example Jesus used from some Jewish beliefs/doctrines (not from Yahweh) of some of the Jewish group(s) that opposed Yahweh and that Jesus exposed (partly) with this example of the rich man and Lazarus. It didn't / doesn't actually 'happen'.
Sorry, you have entirely and utterly misinterpreted.I think you inserted your own excuses. We all know he made that parable in where the character invoked a Saint because it has always been a practice even since Judaism. Protestant denominations who were born after the 16h century can make all the excuses they want.
In the story, which is not a story for the followers of Jesus at all, but is a story for the sons of disobedience Jesus is talking to, he is in a make-believe-place some of the Jewish religious leaders deceived themselves and others about, Jewish religious leaders who were not believing Jesus. Jesus was showing the fallacy of those Jewish religious leaders beliefs with their own false understanding of after-life being exposed painfully to them. They did not believe Jesus is Messiah, but had their own stories to deceive people with , to increase the power of the religious leaders (as they were fond to do) over the people.Evidently the Rich man is somewhere pretty hot. Where is he?
Nope. not at all. There was no condemning at all to the crowd, nor was that used as an example for rebuking. You are just inserting what you want it to say but at the end it shows what Catholics, Orthodox, and even older Protestant denominations have been telling you. Advocating to saints is perfectly normal in practice and here you have Jesus demonstrating that.Sorry, you have entirely and utterly misinterpreted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?