Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There's no need to specify "what" or "who" is "in Christ" for "all in Christ" to be a specific and complete subject. We may supply a "who" or similar, but the phrases are substantive on their own and form a complete subject. "All" by itself is an adjective and can't stand as a subject without a noun being supplied.
It's a simple grammatical issue, don't know why you think it's funny. "All" is incomplete for a subject because as you pointed out it could be all fish, all melons, all of nothing, or all of everything. It describes (something) and if we don't know what it is describing it can't be the subject of a sentence. When we limit it with a prepositional phrase like "in Adam" or "in Christ" it becomes a substantive and can stand as the subject of a sentence, we may add words to increase clarity but they're not grammatically necessary. Your question is superflous because "all in Adam" tells you all what, it's everything that is contained "in Adam."LOL.
There's no maze. You're making an inappropriate inference based on the structure of the English, I'm treating it according to the Greek grammar which bears no such ambiguity. It's a statement of federal headship, with the subjects of the clauses being "all in Adam" and "all in Christ."
"All in Adam" and "all in Christ" are substantives(they act like nouns), "all" bears no noun.
Amazing how now you are suddenly qualified to evaluate arguments. Given your own insistence on your woeful inability to understand, I'll take your complaint about not being clearr and being unconfident with a grain of salt.You sound very unsure and what you say has no clarity.
Here's an analysis by Keith DeRose that's both confident and clear.
Here's the verse we're talking about:
1 Corinthians 15:22. "For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive."
Keith DeRose in his article "Universalism_and_the_Bible":
"It's very clear, I think, that those who are "made alive" in Christ are, as it's often put, "saved." The question is, To whom will this happen? This passage's answer: All! A point of grammar, which holds for the Greek as well as our English translations: The grammatical function of "in Christ" here is not to modify or limit the "all." The passage doesn't say, "...so also shall all who are in Christ be made alive." If it said that, I wouldn't be so cheered by the passage. Rather, "in Christ" is an adverbial phrase that modifies the verb "shall be made" or perhaps the whole clause, "shall all be made alive." Thus, this passage says that all shall be made alive. How? In Christ."
Amazing how now you are suddenly qualified to evaluate arguments. Given your own insistence on your woeful inability to understand, I'll take your complaint about not being clearr and being unconfident with a grain of salt.
That said I can't help but notice he makes his argument on English grammar, and bases it on the English rendering. A prime fallacy that is discussed in every translational fallacy books.
The problem is that in Greek what determines where to place the prepositional phrase in the sentence(in the subject vs in the predicate) is the case ending, and the case ending that is present places it in the subject, not the predicate which is good because without the prepositional phrase the sentences would be grammatically incomplete since an adjective is not a proper subject.
It's a simple grammatical issue, don't know why you think it's funny. "All" is incomplete for a subject because as you pointed out it could be all fish, all melons, all of nothing, or all of everything. It describes (something) and if we don't know what it is describing it can't be the subject of a sentence. When we limit it with a prepositional phrase like "in Adam" or "in Christ" it becomes a substantive and can stand as the subject of a sentence, we may add words to increase clarity but they're not grammatically necessary. Your question is superflous because "all in Adam" tells you all what, it's everything that is contained "in Adam."
Amazing how now you are suddenly qualified to evaluate arguments. Given your own insistence on your woeful inability to understand
Hmm is younger so maybe you can keep him going at it longer.
I think a lot of people who call themselves Christians have never seen and tasted God and don’t know the love of God or his character. If they did they would know He is worth loving because of who He is. I think too many people just adopt a form of religion so they can escape what they think is a eternal torture chamber and try to make sure the good outweighs the bad . Too much of what we call Christian is all about heaven or hell not realizing that Jesus died to give us life now not just in the afterlife, if all people on earth would follow God now in the mortal body could you imagine what a beautiful place this world would be, but sadly too many people are only focusing on the next age to come not this one.Good topic, thanks.
This question, quoted above, caught my eye.
Seems to be exactly what happened. The emphasis on an eternal destiny became the primary driver of the church.
There was a topic a while back where the question was asked: "If there was no afterlife, would you still follow Jesus?" (something like that) I was shocked at the majority response. A firm and resounding, "No. With no afterlife it would be pointless." (something like that)
No value was seen in a right relationship with God, in the here and now, if there was no "reward" of heaven.
To that end the church has labels. The "lost", the "saved", the "Elect", predestination, etc. Us and them.
I think a lot of people who call themselves Christians have never seen and tasted God and don’t know the love of God or his character. If they did they would know He is worth loving because of who He is. I think too many people just adopt a form of religion so they can escape what they think is a eternal torture chamber and try to make sure the good outweighs the bad . Too much of what we call Christian is all about heaven or hell not realizing that Jesus died to give us life now not just in the afterlife, if all people on earth would follow God now in the mortal body could you imagine what a beautiful place this world would be, but sadly too many people are only focusing on the next age to come not this one.
Who said it was the writer's error or even an error at all? The age may be correct didn't some of the OT people live 100s of years? It may have been a printer's type setting error.Well, if the writers of the article can't even get a guy's age right, I'm not sure I can trust them on the eternal verities, thank you so much.
If you are not a scholar, and certainly not a professional scholar, why do you insist that "aionios" does not mean "eternal," but "age during" or some such nonsense, despite irrefutable evidence to the contrary and insist "Kolasis" means "prune, correction" despite evidence to the contrary?I'm not in a position to insist on anything because, like you, I am not a professional scholar. I merely listen to what they say. It's really not that difficult. 'Correction lasting an age', or something like it, are what the words mean.
When you simply have an adjective, what it is describing has to be known. You had to supply a noun when I asked "all what?" to make your view make sense. I need supply nothing with the prepositonal phrase, so the question in that instance is superfluous. It's not a game of cat and mouse, it's an issue of grammar. An adjective can't be the subject of a sentence, so "all" is insufficient to stand in that place. In English we can treat it as an ellipsis and supply a noun based on context, but ellipsis is the least transferrable grammatical object across languages.It wasn't my question, it was your question. And we are getting nowhere with this. It went off the rails a while ago and has just been a game of cat and mouse. And I've gotten too old to be willing to invest much time and energy in such pursuits. Hmm is younger so maybe you can keep him going at it longer. But I'm done with the "all" game.
I'm sure you have noticed as I have that a favorite deception of the UR group is toWhen you simply have an adjective, what it is describing has to be known. You had to supply a noun when I asked "all what?" to make your view make sense. I need supply nothing with the prepositonal phrase, so the question in that instance is superfluous. It's not a game of cat and mouse, it's an issue of grammar. An adjective can't be the subject of a sentence, so "all" is insufficient to stand in that place. In English we can treat it as an ellipsis and supply a noun based on context, but ellipsis is the least transferrable grammatical object across languages.
Presumably God would have foreseen that the vagueness in the Bible about heaven and hell would lead to different interpretations and the arguments we see today about Infernalism, Annihalism and Universalism.
Did He have a good reason for keeping things so undefined?
It's more that they were never saved to begin with...
that's always the fear with verses like those.. especially in combination with Calvinism, which with Romans 9 seems to be supported, and in that case it opens the possibility that you choose God but God has not chosen you.
I have to fall back on some things Jesus said in John 6
So.. I have to trust that if I choose Jesus, He chose me too, and that He wouldn't reject me if I come to Him.
but doubting my own self worth is one of my largest hurdles.
"why choose me, I'm worthless"
"why even create me, I don't even like singing"
"what can I do for the gospel, I think that I'm so bad with people that I couldn't even convince someone that water is wet, they'd disagree with me just because it's me telling them and obviously I'm wrong about everything"
like.. Ive encountered people arguing , and using Jesus' name as a curse.. and so.. I thought, Gospel opportunity
and tried telling them about Jesus
oh it stopped the fight
they just both started cursing me and cursing Jesus instead of each other.
I'm just... really bad about it.
Are you talking about sharing the gospel? If so the best any of us can do is just love people where they are at and pray for them, and God will do the rest.
Yeah... there's always just pressure that every single person's "calling" is to be an evangelist, missionary, or preacher of some sort, I don't have any skills in those arenas whatsoever so I feel ill equipped to do that
but I certainly don't know my calling, I thought it was in the medical field but God showed me no several times and the harder I pushed my own way the worse the chastisement became
until I became crippled and realized God was saying "that wasn't it"
but when looking for what it even was.. I got nothing, except everyone says that EVERYONE's calling is to... somehow be an evangelist or preacher.
Have you thought about what you are most comfortable or passionate about? I find that what we feel most naturally drawn to is where our spiritual gifting is and is usually compliments our natural gifting. For example a nurse or medical professional in their natural state are Drawn towards healing, they may also have the spiritual gift of healing. Healing can be someone with good listening skills. Every once in a while a stranger may just need someone who will listen and we can always pray. Praying is another gift, the gift of intercession is stepping in and praying for someone we know personally or don’t know. Years ago a Pastor I listened to suggested we pray for the garbage man or the mechanic, anyone we came into a short contact with we should pray for that person. I try my best to just randomly pray for someone who I don’t know anything about.
Here is a spiritual gift test you may like:
Spiritual Gifts Test - Rock Church
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?