Why is it???

[Antman_05]

Why is it that some churches can, condeam people other denominations so on and so forth, but get away with it. But when we do somthing of that nature we would get reported??

Why is it that, Truth now must take second place with, Lies makeing head ways.

Why is it that the Bible isn't the single Authority, though Church History from the early days sense the canon says that it alone in inspired by God.

Rant over............

 

[erin74]

All I can say is that if you see a post that you think breaks any of our rules please report it, as staff find it difficult to find all the posts that may not comply to the rules. We can only moderate what we know about.

 

[holeinone]

Why is it that some churches can, condeam people other denominations so on and so forth, but get away with it. But when we do somthing of that nature we would get reported??

Why is it that, Truth now must take second place with, Lies makeing head ways.

Why is it that the Bible isn't the single Authority, though Church History from the early days sense the canon says that it alone in inspired by God.

Rant over............

Because there is a bias here that is why.

When slams against Luther or other reformers are allowed with no action, say one negative thing against some other faiths or leaders and it is seen as just an "honest" opinion.

A site like this is all about keeping the numbers and it is the largest group has the loudest voice and power.

 

[holeinone]

All I can say is that if you see a post that you think breaks any of our rules please report it, as staff find it difficult to find all the posts that may not comply to the rules. We can only moderate what we know about.

Not really

I reported a post where Luther was called "prideful" and compared to heretics .

Guess what it still is there.

If i had called the pope prideful because he has men laying prostrate before him or even dared implied that Luther was correcting heresies, I would have had that post edited or removed and an alert or action given.

The bias is as clear as can be.

 

[AndOne]

Uh oh - not supposed to question the all powerful authority and decisions of the moderators either!

Better be careful holeinone - you're one chip shot away from a bogie!

 

[holeinone]

Uh oh - not supposed to question the all powerful authority and decisions of the moderators either!

Better be careful holeinone - you're one chip shot away from a bogie!

Just exchanging opinions.erins ok



I believe that if you are not being critical publicly of a specific mod action you are allowed to comment. I do not know who reviewed or decided not to act, it was just a general observation

7.1 You will not post in a disparaging or argumentative manner about a moderator or staff member's actions in any public area of the site including the Chatbox. The exception is through the Staff Feedback Form found here which is reposted in the private Staff Appeals (when a member appeals an official warning) or public Staff Praise forums. This is a formal staff feedback process that should be followed to ensure that the matter is investigated properly and by the right people. Alternatively, a member may report a staff member directly to his staff team leader.

 

[erin74]

Not really

I reported a post where Luther was called "prideful" and compared to heretics .

Guess what it still is there.

If i had called the pope prideful because he has men laying prostrate before him or even dared implied that Luther was correcting heresies, I would have had that post edited or removed and an alert or action given.

The bias is as clear as can be.

perhaps you can pm me with the details and I will look into it.

Also if anyone has problems with the even handed moderating, I can only suggest you discuss it in the Support area, which is set up to handle this kind of issue.