Why Is Darwinism So Dangerous? (5)

[PsychoSarah]

That's the point, there is none. Only humans received the living soul of God.

Provide the scripture that explicitly says animals don't have souls. You can't say sin is needed to indicate a soil, because humans alone were the only species stated to give in to sin, they didn't, according to scripture, start out that way.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Where have I lied about your beliefs. You constantly call me a liar....but I'm not going to report you for that. Please report me for questioning your beliefs if you must. Your threats will certainly not prevent me from posting my views and questioning other's views. [/quote}

No, I point out when you lie. If you have been corrected numerous times on an error it is no longer an error. It is a falsehood. We have gone over this before

[quotee]And yes, there is "Godless creationism". It's presented over and over in our schools cloaked in the guise of 'science'.

Nope, not once. See, that was a lie. You know it is not true. You won't even attempt to learn why it is not true. Ignorance when you have been corrected is not a saving grace.

No Christians accepts Godless creationism.

I never said that they did. Most of them do accept the theory of evolution.

You keep alluding to your evidence, or as you claimed earlier, 'mountains of evidence' for the view that humanity is a result of only, completely, totally, solely naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. Where is it?

But you have to learn what evidence is first. You have shown time and time again that you are dishonest and cannot be trusted. That is why you have to pay by learning before the evidence is presented to you.

I asked if you wanted to learn.

 

[justlookinla]

Provide the scripture that explicitly says animals don't have souls

Only humans received living souls from God, per scripture. There is no scripture where God breathed living souls into animals.

If you have scripture where anyone but humans were given God-breathed souls, please post it. Otherwise the point is made....only humans have souls.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Then show it! Stop saying you have it and show it!

Who do you think you're fooling?

Sorry, people who have shown that they are not to be trusted first have to learn what scientific evidence is.

Why are you people so afraid to learn what scientific evidence is?

 

[justlookinla]

Nope, not once. See, that was a lie. You know it is not true. You won't even attempt to learn why it is not true. Ignorance when you have been corrected is not a saving grace.

Of course it's true. Tell you what, show me where there is any creation of humanity taught in schools other than from an entirely, completely, totally naturalistic process.

I await.

I never said that they did. Most of them do accept the theory of evolution.

None of them accepts Godless evolution.

But you have to learn what evidence is first. You have shown time and time again that you are dishonest and cannot be trusted. That is why you have to pay by learning before the evidence is presented to you.

I asked if you wanted to learn.

And one more empty claim by you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Only humans received living souls from God, per scripture. There is no scripture where God breathed living souls into animals.

If you have scripture where anyone but humans were given God-breathed souls, please post it. Otherwise the point is made....only humans have souls.

Neither does it say that God did not give animals souls. For you to claim that animals have no souls you need to find evidence that supports that claim. All Sarah is saying is that the book is not closed on that subject.

 

[crazyforgod1212]

Sorry, people who have shown that they are not to be trusted first have to learn what scientific evidence is.

Why are you people so afraid to learn what scientific evidence is?

I know what scientific evidence is. Evolutionists are the ones that seem confused on the matter - they think a process that's never been observed and can't be repeated counts as science.

News flash - it doesn't!

 

[Oncedeceived]

Welcome back Just.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Only humans received living souls from God, per scripture. There is no scripture where God breathed living souls into animals.

If you have scripture where anyone but humans were given God-breathed souls, please post it. Otherwise the point is made....only humans have souls.

God breathes life into all creatures. Reaffirmed by the flood story

Genesis 7:15 Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came to Noah and entered the ark.

 

[justlookinla]

Neither does it say that God did not give animals souls. For you to claim that animals have no souls you need to find evidence that supports that claim. All Sarah is saying is that the book is not closed on that subject.

No, for someone to claim that animals have souls per scripture would need to provide scripture for that claim. Otherwise it's just an empty claim like your 'mountains of evidence' claim.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Of course it's true. Tell you what, show me where there is any creation of humanity taught in schools other than from an entirely, completely, totally naturalistic process.

I await.

There is no creation taught at all in schools. And please do not make up garbage. You are supposed to be a Christian.

None of them accepts Godless evolution.

But most accept the theory of evolution and know that evolution is a fact.

And one more empty claim by you.

Please, I am not a lying creationist. None of my claims are empty. They can all be supported by evidence.

In fact I will dig up some evidence of Christians believing the theory of evolution. Think of it as a gift to you.

 

[justlookinla]

God breathes life into all creatures. Reaffirmed by the flood story

Genesis 7:15 Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came to Noah and entered the ark.

God never makes anyone but humans living souls though. Again, if you have scripture where God breaths into a life form and it becomes a living soul other than humans, please post it.

 

[PsychoSarah]

God breathes life into all creatures. Reaffirmed by the flood story

Genesis 7:15 Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came to Noah and entered the ark.

In case justlookinla missed it

 

[PsychoSarah]

God never makes anyone but humans living souls though. Again, if you have scripture where God breaths into a life form and it becomes a living soul other than humans, please post it.

How about you provide scripture that proves that phrase even means giving humans a soul. It says breath of life, which on several occasions animals are stated to have.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Here is a graph. Some people seem to have trouble understanding print so I got a pretty picture. The Blue are the people who accept that evolution explains how life got here:

 

[justlookinla]

There is no creation taught at all in schools. And please do not make up garbage. You are supposed to be a Christian.

Sure it is. Humanity is the result of entirely naturalistic processes according to the creationist theory taught in schools. Humans were created, over a long period of time, only by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. While you may not like it, that's creationism of the atheistic kind.

But most accept the theory of evolution and know that evolution is a fact.

No Christian accepts Godless evolution. Stop trying to suggest they do.

Please, I am not a lying creationist.

You sure like labeling others as liars. That's frequent in your posts. If the admins don't have a problem with it, I don't. I realize the spirit which is behind such language.

None of my claims are empty. They can all be supported by evidence.

And yet one more empty claim.

In fact I will dig up some evidence of Christians believing the theory of evolution. Think of it as a gift to you.

Sure you will. Make sure that God isn't part of the process for those Christians.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What is embarrassing about that graph is that the only country more backwards than the U.S. is Turkey.

It gives me very very little pride to say "Well, at least we beat Turkey".

 

[crazyforgod1212]

Here is a graph. Some people seem to have trouble understanding print so I got a pretty picture. The Blue are the people who accept that evolution explains how life got here:

Ah, an evolutionist trick. I notice that the graph doesn't specify what question was asked. Do you expect me to take your word? Trust has to be earned, and evolutionists run low.

 

[justlookinla]

How about you provide scripture that proves that phrase even means giving humans a soul. It says breath of life, which on several occasions animals are stated to have.

Well, you're not giving scripture where God breathed a living soul into anyone but humans and there's a reason for that. God only breathed a living soul into humans.

 

[justlookinla]

Ah, an evolutionist trick. I notice that the graph doesn't specify what question was asked. Do you expect me to take your word? Trust has to be earned, and evolutionists run low.

Exactly. I find this behavior common among atheistic evolutionists.