Why Is Darwinism So Dangerous? (5)

[justlookinla]

"Half breed ape man"? I see we have yet another scientifically illiterate Creationist requesting something that wouldn't exist.

Tell you what though. Is this being "fully ape" or "fully human" and please explain why?

Where's the soul?

 

[RickG]

Where's the soul?

Doesn't the soul leave when they die?

 

[justlookinla]

Doesn't the soul leave when they die?

Yes it does. I ask again, where's their soul?

 

[USincognito]

Where's the soul?

Why don't you just answer the question or go find some other sandbox to poop in.

 

[RickG]

Yes it does. I ask again, where's their soul?

In heaven with God the father.

 

[justlookinla]

Why don't you just answer the question or go find some other sandbox to poop in.

Had a soul, human, doesn't have a soul, ape.

Where's the soul?

 

[justlookinla]

In heaven with God the father.

Ok, the answer is 'fully human'.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Had a soul, human, doesn't have a soul, ape.

Where's the soul?

That is purely opinion and depends on what you consider the soul to be

 

[justlookinla]

That is purely opinion and depends on what you consider the soul to be

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

That one.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

That one.

And every creature that have the breath of life besides humans too. Quote the verse that says only humans have souls. Because as far as Genesis goes, plants seem to be the only exclusion.

 

[justlookinla]

And every creature that have the breath of life besides humans too. Quote the verse that says only humans have souls. Because as far as Genesis goes, plants seem to be the only exclusion.

Only humans have souls, only human souls are redeemed. Or dammed, depending on one's response to the gospel.

Heb_10:39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

Jas_5:20 Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.

​

Only humans can respond to the soul saving message of Jesus Christ....or reject it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Only humans have souls, only human souls are redeemed. Or dammed, depending on one's response to the gospel.

Heb_10:39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

Jas_5:20 Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.

​

Only humans can respond to the soul saving message of Jesus Christ....or reject it.

So, any objective evidence for a soul?

 

[justlookinla]

So, any objective evidence for a soul?

As much objective evidence as you have for Godless creationism.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Only humans have souls, only human souls are redeemed. Or dammed, depending on one's response to the gospel.

Heb_10:39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

Jas_5:20 Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.

​

Only humans can respond to the soul saving message of Jesus Christ....or reject it.

True, but only humans ate of the forbidden fruit and are supposedly capable of sin. Thus, other animals wouldn't have any sins they needed to be forgiven for.

 

[Subduction Zone]

As much objective evidence as you have for Godless creationism.

But I don't believe in "godless creationism". I accept the theory of evolution.

Please don't try to lie about my beliefs. That will get you reported.

And as a Christian you are supposed to be honest anyway. Please quit making up garbage.

Most Christians accept the theory of evolution world wide.

I do have objective, scientific evidence that supports my beliefs. You have shown time and again that you do not have any evidence. The Catholic church recognizes envy as a sin, and they have a very good reason for doing that.

 

[justlookinla]

True, but only humans ate of the forbidden fruit and are supposedly capable of sin. Thus, other animals wouldn't have any sins they needed to be forgiven for.

Scripture doesn't make that distinction.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Scripture doesn't make that distinction.

Provide the scripture that states animals can sin

 

[justlookinla]

But I don't believe in "godless creationism". I accept the theory of evolution.

Please don't try to lie about my beliefs. That will get you reported.

Where have I lied about your beliefs. You constantly call me a liar....but I'm not going to report you for that. Please report me for questioning your beliefs if you must. Your threats will certainly not prevent me from posting my views and questioning other's views.

And yes, there is "Godless creationism". It's presented over and over in our schools cloaked in the guise of 'science'.

And as a Christian you are supposed to be honest anyway. Please quit making up garbage.

Most Christians accept the theory of evolution world wide.

No Christians accepts Godless creationism.

I do have objective, scientific evidence that supports my beliefs. You have shown time and again that you do not have any evidence. The Catholic church recognizes envy as a sin, and they have a very good reason for doing that.

You keep alluding to your evidence, or as you claimed earlier, 'mountains of evidence' for the view that humanity is a result of only, completely, totally, solely naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. Where is it?

 

[justlookinla]

Provide the scripture that states animals can sin

That's the point, there is none. Only humans received the living soul of God.

 

[crazyforgod1212]

I do have objective, scientific evidence that supports my beliefs

Then show it! Stop saying you have it and show it!

Who do you think you're fooling?