Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When one is totally ignorant of the sciences one can be convinced by many bad arguments that one wants to believe. The reality is far different.Are you saying that the Strong Nuclear Force, a fundamental constant in nature, is somehow changed by a temperature change of a few hundred degrees?
Pointing out the history of the dismal state of humanity doesn't mean I have a negative outlook on life. Like I said; my hope is in Christ. Not in myself, you or any other fallen human being. My hope isn't in angels. It's not in "saving the earth".
My trust is in Christ and that He paid for my sin. My assured hope (and not just wishful thinking) is that on the other side of eternity NONE of this current suffering is going to matter! At least it's not going to matter for me. I can't speak for your eternity.
Why would you want a line of narrow bodies of water? I don't know of any triangles that use strait lines.
The only creationist geologist that I know of that has dabbled in dating is easily shown to be a liar. Do you know of any honest geochemists that oppose evolution? I seriously doubt if you can find any.
When one is totally ignorant of the sciences one can be convinced by many bad arguments that one wants to believe. The reality is far different.
I know of one radioactive that greatly increases its decay rate if you can reduce it to a naked nucleus. The problem is that the conditions where a naked nucleus is not even to be found within the Sun much less anywhere on or in the Earth. Let me see if I can find it.
By definition you can't have a strait line on a sphere because a sphere is 3 dimensional.
Prove to me that all geochemists are evolutionists. (Two people can play this game too.)
How exactly am I doing that?
What does this have to do with anything in this topic or sub-forum? This isn't a general theology discussion.
You were talking about "strait lines". Strait lines are never used in Euclidean, flat-space geometry.???? What does your comment have anything to do with Euclidean, flat-space geometry?
That mathematical principle is speaking of the difference between two dimensional and three demential spaces. A shape in two dimensional space has points and lines. A shape in a three dimensional space also has planes.
It's like the difference between a painting on a canvas and a sculpture. Paintings have height and width, but only have the illusion of depth.
By definition you can't have a strait line on a sphere because a sphere is 3 dimensional. A line is not. So thus any line you'd put on a sphere would be curved. Now on a two dimensional space you could draw a line through a circle and call it a diameter. But the diameter of a sphere would be a plane.
Want to bet?That has nothing do do with bodies of water.
l> - There's a rudimentary depiction of a two dimensional triangle. Where do you not see any strait lines? A three dimensional triangle is generally called a pyramid.
Prove to me that all geochemists are evolutionists. (Two people can play this game too.)
I thought I said that it is unlikely that any geochemists are "evolutionists".
Evolutionary biology (evolutionists) and geochemistry (geochemists) are very different scientific fields.
-snip-
The "evolutionist" aspect of geochemistry has to do with postulated ages of the earth. If the estimation is predicated on unreliable dating methods. A geochemist can't be sure based on the dating method that their dating is accurate.
Yes, but that would only extend half lives. Creationists need to cut half lives down. Way down.Pretty much any thing that decays by electron capture. When fully ionized the nucleus can't capture an inner electron.
Electron capture - Wikipedia
Temperature and density affect the decay rate in a fully ionized plasma as they determine the probability that an electron will be "close enough" to the nucleus to be captured.
I never said that you said anything about geochemists and evolutionists. That was a comment someone else made to me that I was responding to.
The "evolutionist" aspect of geochemistry has to do with postulated ages of the earth. If the estimation is predicated on unreliable dating methods. A geochemist can't be sure based on the dating method that their dating is accurate.
You were talking about "strait lines". Strait lines are never used in Euclidean, flat-space geometry.
Once again, strait lines are not used that way.;
Want to bet?
Okay . . . So what?
Sorry, you made your foolish claim first. You need to defend it before you get to ask others to do the same.
Dude! You are the one that keeps talking about "strait lines".OK than explain to me how what you said about water applies to Euclidean flat space geometry; because "flat space" geometry would deal in two dimensions not three. (thus why it's called "flat space geometry"). Whereas water exists in three dimensions.
Too much fun to stop, though I did tip my hand a bit too much in my last post.This is very funny.
I'm sure you straitened up the matter for him.Too much fun to stop, though I did tip my hand a bit too much in my last post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?