- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,105
- 114,202
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Those were his words, and his explanations of his words. And yet you claim to know more about his motive for speaking those words than he did. Big assumption - big hypocrisy.
Which is funny, because you've never actually been able to successfully use of any of Darwin's word to indicate why he shouldn't be taken seriously. So that only negatively affects your credibility, not his
Here's a tidbit...it has been said by Dawkins, amongst others, that no one knows the origin of the cell. Is that true?
I don't know about "several galaxies complex" (I'm pretty sure that's not a well-defined unit of measurement), but yes, the cell is very complex, much more complex than Darwin knew about. The theory of evolution is good and useful not because it was invented by people who knew everything, but because it seems to be an accurate model for the development and diversity of life on this planet. Darwin's ideas about inheritance were completely wrong, and have long since been rejected. His ideas about common descent and natural selection were largely correct, and have been retained. Of course, they have been modified and made more nuanced along the way, but the basic ideas work to explain what we see in the natural world.your last statement.....then what good is this theory of evolution based on Darwin's limited, antiquated theories and ideas? He apparently believed a cell was very simple. What science knows now, is that a cell is at least several galaxies complex.
No.... You've been told what Dawkins said.
if you do not lose that tone with me i am reporting you.
Do NOT post anything even remotely in my direction in the future.
does it matter, since no one knows their origin?
Originally Posted by brinny
does it matter, since no one knows their origin?
And she dodges and she weaves.
Darwin speaks for himself. He's an unfortunate embarrassment to any who gave him credibility he should've never had from the gitgo.
Originally Posted by brinny
if you do not lose that tone with me i am reporting you.
Do NOT post anything even remotely in my direction in the future.
Remember folks, you apparently do not have the right to ask a creationist for their sources.
But we are the arrogant ones.....
Originally Posted by brinny
Darwin speaks for himself. He's an unfortunate embarrassment to any who gave him credibility he should've never had from the gitgo.
I asked this before but didn't get an answer: Have you read On the Origin of Species?
Yes indeed.does anyone know the origin of cells?
Originally Posted by brinny
is ToE "evolution"?
ToE = The Theory of Evolution
Remember folks, you apparently do not have the right to ask a creationist for their sources.
But we are the arrogant ones.....
Yes indeed.
I know the origin of cells and He was an intelligent designer.
"And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so." -- Genesis 1:11
"And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good." -- Genesis 1:12
Originally Posted by brinny
does anyone know the origin of cells?
What's your source of information on the complexity of cells?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?