Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How do you know this is "God's" opinion?in my opinion the primate classification for humans is wrong and should be re-evaluated and reclassified as a stand alone entity.
Amen, and here's God's Word on it:
Humans (man) was made on the 3rd Day Gen 2:4-7 long BEFORE any other living creature, since everything else was made, from the Water, on the 5th Day Gen 1:21 which was some 10 Billion years AFTER Adam was made. All other living creatures began only 3.77 Billion years ago, in the Water, EXACTLY as God tells us. Scripture and Science AGREE. Amen?
No, that never happened. It was decided that the classification of Pluto as a planet, but the exclusion of other similar bodies, was inconsistent. Not wrong, just not a sensible classification scheme to adopt. Scientists tend to adopt classification schemes that follow rules, and doing so for Pluto meant that lots of other planets would have to be classified as planets as well. Classification can be arbitrary. Nothing prevented astronomers from still calling Pluto a planet -- that's why they had to vote on the subject.well, because it was decided the classification of pluto was wrong, and it was reclassified.
How do you know this is "God's" opinion?
Because it matches their opinion?
Curious, that.
You haven't even demonstrated a basic, fundamental, understanding of ToE.comedy gold.
bravo.
XD
No, that never happened. It was decided that the classification of Pluto as a planet, but the exclusion of other similar bodies, was inconsistent. Not wrong, just not a sensible classification scheme to adopt. Scientists tend to adopt classification schemes that follow rules, and doing so for Pluto meant that lots of other planets would have to be classified as planets as well. Classification can be arbitrary. Nothing prevented astronomers from still calling Pluto a planet -- that's why they had to vote on the subject.
A meaningful question would be whether classifying humans as primates was useful or sensible. To which the answer is, "yes". Humans are more similar to other primates than they are to any other animals, and humans and chimpanzees, for example, are much more similar to each other than either is to something like a lemur, also classified as a primate.
Did their criteria take anything Genesis 1 says into account?A meaningful question would be whether classifying humans as primates was useful or sensible. To which the answer is, "yes".
ha ha ha,
in your rush to attack me you missed the part of the thread where the second post was addressed.
oops
: )
Asteroids do indeed come close. Your point?and yet dwarf planets are "more similar" to planets than any other celestial phenomena , no ?
in fact nothing else comes close (planetoids and asteroids I suppose but then they are another classification altogether).
No, you don't. You said that classifying humans as primates was wrong. More to the point, humans are classified as primates, and humans are more similar to other primates than some other primates are to each other. Your justification for rejecting this classification does not reflect biological reality.if you are happy that you are classified as a primate then good,
i defend your right to think that,
I have no idea. I don't see any reason why it would have made a difference.Did their criteria take anything Genesis 1 says into account?
Calling us animals is classifying us as animals.And which came first, in your opinion:
Classifying humans as animals, or calling us animals first, then classifying us?
to which I addressed and am awaiting a reply.....And those objections have been rebutted.
All this is up thread and yet you repeat your assertions if they not been addressed.
To be honest, I thought he was going to shuffle out of the question by saying they classified primates as humans.You wouldn't understand.
to which I addressed and am awaiting a reply.....
your cross thread stalking is now becoming a little creepy.
if you wish to slag me off at least be accurate.
thank you
: )
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?