PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
To the person who doesn't think quote mining can be done, note I have added no new material, only gotten rid of some of the words you said, to change the message completely
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
we were talking about how peer review works. We were talking about the process of peer review very kindly.
To the person who doesn't think quote mining can be done, note I have added no new material, only gotten rid of some of the words you said, to change the message completely
a misquote, thats what most laywers, professors etc will call it. Quotemines don't exist. But feel free to find a dictionary not affiliated with wikipedia that defines quote mine for you, and I may actually believe it.
LM Grady, the main reason that I gave up trying to discuss with you is that you don't read. You don't read the articles and sites given to you.
You seem to just glance at them then respond. You don't even read the cites you give again appearing to just give them a quick look and if they appear to be supporting you in any way, use them whether or not they actually do.
This is a good example. Loudmouth clearly said that her discovery was peer reviewed 17 years *before* she won the Nobel.
You did not even bother to pay attention to what was said, you simply blundered on with your response. As a result you just made yourself look very foolish. But more importantly, this bad habit of yours makes it almost impossible to discuss anything with you.
Quote mine = misquote
It is a different name for the same freaking thing dude. What you call it isn't important, that the action happens is. If you honestly have been arguing against the phrase quote mine this whole time and not the actual practice I am going to be really mad.
well yes and no. I dont argue against the presence of misquotes but of quotemines. quote mines are used as a hodgepodge catch-all word. for misquote but mainly for quoting out of contxt.
* epic rage quit because of how much of my time you have wasted over wording*
Are you suggesting David was too uppity?The sins such as pride are considered as such when they prevent or hinder worship and service to god. When people get all uppity about their faith rather than using that time to practice it, that is a sin.
Are you suggesting David was too uppity?
He paid for that. God deals with His people here. I don't see how that made him 'uppity'? He was a man after God's heart.If you are talking about the biblical figure, well, he wasn't exactly flawless. He kinda sent a guy to his death so he could steal his wife.
He paid for that. God deals with His people here. I don't see how that made him 'uppity'? He was a man after God's heart.
He paid for that. God deals with His people here. I don't see how that made him 'uppity'? He was a man after God's heart.
It wasn't as bad as you are making it out in those days. I dont think they had the same perspective of things. It was a different way of life. Nowadays we are a lot more civilized. But David did sin and he was punished. But he realized his wrongs and repented. He was a human not a robot or angel. But David had a heart after God. So even though he did wrong he must have realized and repented. But he did a lot of great things as a man of God as well.You don't see how adultery and then having a guy killed so one could have their wife isn't horrifically nasty?
GradyGrady, the main reason that I gave up trying to discuss with you is that you don't read. You don't read the articles and sites given to you.
Somehow I suspect that anything that disagrees with you, you will see as errors.will read them until they pose errors, then I will not waste more time on it.
GradyYou seem to just glance at them then respond. You don't even read the cites you give again appearing to just give them a quick look and if they appear to be supporting you in any way, use them whether or not they actually do.
This is a good example. Loudmouth clearly said that her discovery was peer reviewed 17 years *before* she won the Nobel.
Caused by your not reading before posting.slight mistake
GradyYou did not even bother to pay attention to what was said, you simply blundered on with your response. As a result you just made yourself look very foolish. But more importantly, this bad habit of yours makes it almost impossible to discuss anything with you.
No you wouldn't, that would take self reflection on your behaviors. You seem to be rather lacking on that.I wouldn't say that.
I always get this sense that when someone says they are a christian or in King Davids case a great man of God that if and when they sin its like huh caught you out so there you go your not as good as you said you were game.and a certain young ladies heart, one he wanted so bad he broke the whole no murder rule to get.
and a certain young ladies heart, one he wanted so bad he broke the whole no murder rule to get.
well the guy i responded to said he was after god's heart, but he seems to have placed his own desires ahead of god. even you have to admit killing a man to marry said man's wife is not something a good man does.I always get this sense that when someone says they are a christian or in King Davids case a great man of God that if and when they sin its like huh caught you out so there you go your not as good as you said you were game.
No one is good. No, not one. Especially you and I.I always get this sense that when someone says they are a christian or in King Davids case a great man of God that if and when they sin its like huh caught you out so there you go your not as good as you said you were game.
It doesn't matter what I see. God saw. God dealt with the poor guy. Harshly. Severely. David was never a sinless saint. Yet God honored him extremely, greatly. From his live was to come the forever King, the eternal ruler. The throne of David will always be here, and so will David! I for one am glad that he leaned stuff. That makes for a kinder gentler, wiser, better person. This thing was never about pretending to be a goody two shoes.You don't see how adultery and then having a guy killed so one could have their wife isn't horrifically nasty?
Dizredux Grady Somehow I suspect that anything that disagrees with you, you will see as errors.
Diz
Grady Caused by your not reading before posting.
DizGrady No you wouldn't, that would take self reflection on your behaviors. You seem to be rather lacking on that.
Dizredux
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?