Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How many adaptions are required for one species to change to another, and in the fossil record, what is the ratio of intermediate life forms to non-intermediate species?
your whole argument goes down the tubes when you say we are related to fruit flies. Thats discusting. I mean really. And immoral.
now if you can prove common ancestry to fruit flies,
there are many people who will personally pay you lots of money.
kent hovind has a 250,000 dollar challege for anyone to prove common ancestry to distant relatives, like say monkeys, or fruit flies for that matter (now)
http://creationwiki.org/Evolutionis...'s_challenge_to_prove_evolution_(Talk.Origins)
granted the IRS may have confiscated some of this, the offer still stands lol
btw some of the various kinds of evolution :
"1.Cosmic evolution- the origin of time, space and matter. Big Bang.
2.Chemical evolution- the origin of higher elements from hydrogen.
3.Stellar and planetary evolution- Origin of stars and planets.
4.Organic evolution- Origin of life from inanimate matter.
5.Macroevolution- Origin of major kinds.
6.Microevolution- Variations within kinds
Microevolution, or natural selection, is the only one of these we actually observe
"
"speciation is not evidence for macroevolution, because variation within groups of organisms (however you wish to define those groups) only proves that creatures can adapt to their environments, but does not qualify as evidence that these adaptive changes are without limitation. That is like saying I watched someone jump really high, so that is proof that they used to be able to fly. Evolutionists commonly use the bait n switch method of using microevolution to prove macroevolution. "
above quotes from above link
immoral?
What the heck does that have to do with morality? Must have missed the part of the Bible that says "thou shalt not claim fruit flies as relatives."
Guess it wouldn't surprise me, though...
"The source for the name Beelzebub is in 2 Kings 1:2-3, 6, 16. Baal Zəbûb is variously understood to mean "lord of the flies" or "lord of the (heavenly) dwelling".[" wiki
Consider the source of your inspiration.
I understand that someone professing an antiChrist stance might wish to pretend there was no evil leader of the dark side in the spirit world. I also understand why you would disrespect what Scripture says. That is your problem, though.Your "devil beezlebub" is nothing but a fabrication based on derision between cultures and ignorance over time. Much like Lucifer, made up, none existent, boogey man stories.
Jesus cast them out. Careful.What is the religious fascination with creating devils where there is none?
I understand that someone professing an antiChrist stance might wish to pretend there was no evil leader of the dark side in the spirit world. I also understand why you would disrespect what Scripture says. That is your problem, though.
Jesus cast them out. Careful.
The aberrancy of Christianity asserts a rebel angel who under his own authority lead angels and man away from a God who can't keep the universe in order. In the Judaic culture that Christianity arose from, Satan was God's temperer of man, to test him to see if he would rise or fall by enticing him with his own desires.
Satan is under complete jurisdiction of God (As seen in Job) and doing the job prescribed to him as an obedient angel of The Lord. He finds out which pieces of steel are hard and tempered well, and which are weak and need to go back into the fire.
Isaiah 45:7 "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."
God is Almighty, angels cannot rebel against Him. That is unless you are anthropomorphizing the path of Venus in relation to the Sun.
Scripture begs to differ. That is if you accept scripture.
Rev 12:7 Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back,
Rev 12:8 but he was defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven.
Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world--he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
I fully accept it as a spiritual message describing real events in a manner the people at the time could understand. As a spiritual message to be read with the Holy Spirit, I understand that the surface level meaning of the words is only a reflection and the Reality is below the surface.
The Truth is always clothed in cultural allegory and anthropomorphism. It changes clothes from culture to culture.
Horse doo doo. Gabriel knew what His name was, he told Mary what it would be.There was no one called "Jesus" 2014 years ago. His name has been changed. It was Yehoshua ha Mashiach and he is my Lord and redeemer, come in the flesh in my own life time and I saw the Son of God face to face.
I have never found verses like these 'slander'.You can take your anti-Christ slander and crucify it.
Horse doo doo.I didn't say there are no devils, I said two specific ones (Beelzebub and Lucifer) are completely fabricated, made up, provable by history.
God is one God. and the Old testament pointed the way to Christ. Jesus clarified some things, and it is crystal clear that Satan is not some neutral character.In the Judaic culture that Christianity arose from, Satan was God's temperer of man, to test him to see if he would rise or fall by enticing him with his own desires.
Man rebelled too. Deal with it.God is Almighty, angels cannot rebel against Him.
your whole argument goes down the tubes when you say we are related to fruit flies. Thats discusting. I mean really. And immoral.
Horse doo doo. Gabriel knew what His name was, he told Mary what it would be.
I have never found verses like these 'slander'.
1Jo 4:2 -Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
1Jo 4:3 -And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
Horse doo doo.
God is one God. and the Old testament pointed the way to Christ. Jesus clarified some things, and it is crystal clear that Satan is not some neutral character.
Man rebelled too. Deal with it.
The letter "J" did not exist until 500 years ago. Deal with it.
I have confessed my direct interaction with the Son of God in the flesh, proven before my ears and ears. It is impossible for me to "believe" because I know and there is no room for doubt. But you don't really believe in that sort of thing do you....
He was not called Jesus until 500 years ago. Fact.
No one called him Jesus while he was alive. Fact.
His real name means God the Father saves. Fact.
"Jesus" said his name was very important. Fact.
The accurate transliteration of his real name Yehoshua should be Joshua and is transliterated this way for other Yehoshuas in the bible. "Jesus" is not even the correct transliteration of his name.
Fact.
The lying pens of the scribes have altered scripture throughout the ages as state in the bible and exemplified in the total fabrication of "Lucifer".
Fact.
The mythos wrapped around the name "Jesus" takes salvation away from the Father, where it belongs, where his real name says it belongs.
Fact.
Truth about God from the bible and documented history and "Jesus's" Name (Yehoshua) or fables of man's errant beliefs.
You choose.
If you think about, we are more closely related to snakes than to fruit flies; at least snakes are vertebrates.
However we pronounce the name now isn't an issue. God knew how we would pronounce it, and how it was spoken then. Jesus is the way the truth and the life, and no man goes to the Father but by Him. Now you may want to peddle your demonic and antiChrist little doubts and philosophies somewhere else. I am not interested, thanks.
So my personal testimony of Yeshua come in the flesh is moot to you? And the importance of His name, as he said it was, is meaningless to you? Figures it would be to a goat.
If it's not an issue then why do you condemn me? You reveal yourself a worker of iniquity and a slanderer of brethren. You have not God in mind but your own self righteousness. As shone by the trap you set for me that I willingly walked into, and you snap it shut with all the glee of a cruel and petulant child.
You do not have living Spirit but dead letters, and you look for opportunities to slay with them to protect your god of fortresses.
You only condemn yourself.
No, it is evidence you are false.So my personal testimony of Yeshua come in the flesh is moot to you?
His name was passed down, it is fine, thanks.And the importance of His name, as he said it was, is meaningless to you? Figures it would be to a goat.
The test of an antichrist spirit is not mine. I just use it.If it's not an issue then why do you condemn me? You reveal yourself a worker of iniquity and a slanderer of brethren.
If that is some remorse for your condition, easy to fix, just get saved.You have not God in mind but your own self righteousness. As shone by the trap you set for me that I willingly walked into, and you snap it shut with all the glee of a cruel and petulant child.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?