Why yes we do, but it goes a bit further back than the most recently shared ancestral species with other mammals.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Certainly not any theories from so called science. You heard it here folks! By the way, I assume you believe you share an ancestor with the potato too?
OK, so as a Baptist then, you feel that man shared an ancestor with a potato. OK. If flatworms having sex eventually resulted in mankind, what should we think about Genesis saying God formed man from the dust of the earth?Why yes we do, but it goes a bit further back than the most recently shared ancestral species with other mammals.
OK, so as a Baptist then, you feel that man shared an ancestor with a potato. OK. If flatworms having sex eventually resulted in mankind, what should we think about Genesis saying God formed man from the dust of the earth?
He did it with the intermediate stage of flatworms having sex, of course. In other words, speaking of creating man from the dust of the earth is expressing that the earth brought us forth via evolution only in language that could be accepted by the men to whom the revelation was given.
Your link does not work. But my link says that his work is on the list. You can't get any more "primitive" in Darwinism than the original book where the theory of evolution was first laid out.
Why can't you understand that simple fact? Is it because it goes against your prejudices?
Where in the book "Origin of Species" does it say that we should kill Jews?
Where in that "university information" does it discuss the part of the theory of evolution that says we should kill Jews?
They both shouldn't exist, and for the same reasons. The theory of evolution supports Social Darwinism as much as the theory of gravity supports throwing Jews off of tall buildings. IOW, it doesn't support it at all.
It appears that you are the father of deception, continually deceiving posters. Why is that?
social darwinism has historic roots in darwinism, hence it's name. So I am not sure what your point is here.
"Social Darwinists base their beliefs on theories of evolution developed by British naturalist Charles Darwin. "
from the University of Colorado at Boulder database
Social Darwinism
You do realize that" Survival of the Fittest" was not Darwin's term.survival of the fittest was carried out into social darwinism, where this was somehow made okay. But it started with survival of the fittest.
You do realize that" Survival of the Fittest" was not Darwin's term.
Dizredux
So we can forget God breathing life into the man, and creating woman from his body too I guess in your 'biblical' view. God never reaaalllly had the animals come to the man to be named in your model. There could not have been animals if they and man came from the flatworm. Thankfully we have you here to tell us what the Almighty really meant, but messed up.
You might as well face it, the very toes on your feet bear witness of a previous ancestral species that could actually grasp branches with all four limbs.
Nothing in scripture even slightly hints as such a view.
So according to your view of God's word (or do you even call it that?) long after flatworms procreated and eventually led to all animals and mankind, we gained some 'new level of spiritual life'!? That was what God meant when He claimed He breathed life into man in creation week, on day six, also marked out by mornings and evenings.Forget it? Hardly! Understand it, however, as the granting of a new level of spiritual life in our species.
If flatworms were a direct ancestor of man and animals, then who cares if they also existed when Adam named the animals? The point was that when Adam naned the animals, they had, according to you all descended from this worm. (and before this some long line of other little creatures)Your statement "there could not have been animals if they and man came from the flatworm" makes no sense at all. You think evolution theory says only one species can exist at a time?
Now let's crystallize your claims here. God really did take a rib from Adam, but Adam had descended from a flatworm! Adam and Eve also were directly related to potatoes!? God just couldn't help but fib about the days and mornings and evenings. OK.As for creating Eve from Adam's body, its perfectly possible to take Adam as the first of our species granted an immortal soul, and placed in the garden, and Eve taken from Adam. Why not? Just because Adam was created by evolution doesn't rule those things out.
So the bible was only meant to be understood by men of yesterday in your opinion also! When it talks of how the wise shall understand, for example, in the latter days of the world, how would it be, then, that we all have the same text to understand? Why would God write it that way for us, if He was really just doing idiot speak for supposed near ape men?Or we could view that all as a parable, suited for the understanding of people who were, after all, very primitive.
There IS NO evidence whatsoever for either. So called science has merely set up a religious methodology to interpret evidence and assign imaginary ages.You wish to disregard all the evidence for evolution and the age of the earth. Its too late, people know about those things now.
My toes do nothing of the sort actually. Even if Adam had better grasping power in the roes, that doesn't mean he climbed trees and ate bananas, and stuck his fingers under his armpits, and grunted! You impose godless visions onto everything, from head to feet.You might as well face it, the very toes on your feet bear witness of a previous ancestral species that could actually grasp branches with all four limbs.
Social Darwinism was not an idea of Darwin's. It appears to be very much akin to the extreme right wing advocacy of unregulated capitalism. Its a mystery why those who advocate extreme right wing unfettered capitalism are so often opposed to Darwin and his ideas.
Of course, the problem with survival of the fittest corporations is that it is the corporations that wind up surviving instead of people.
By his actions and fruit, he seems to have been another tree than a Christian one. This lesson I apply to any antiChrist government such as the present one in the US.
But we should remember here that you are a man who actually thinks he shares a parent with a potato!!! You believe, in other words that some parent or ancestor of the potato was also yours!!!
Why would I care what someone who thought worms having sex eventually produced mankind thought about who really had the creator inside their heart?
You are not qualified to tell others what the truth is not or is.
that was your link: (reposted below)
they were clearly NOT banned: of all the works of darwin, none were cited below:
When Books Burn: Lists of Banned Books, 1933-1939
is that not the original link you posted and not to mention
Origin of the species, is not on the list, what is is primitive darwinism (monism)
from your link number 6# on the list of banned books
"6. Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (H�ckel)."
1 Timothy 6:20: committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
Psalms 19:1: The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Just observing nature and the universe...we see the amazing handy work of God. God warns us to stay away from "falsely so called science".
What is falsely so called science? How about believing in that a dot smaller than a period expanded in a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth second into all the matter today and life came out of it.
Why do we show charts of monkeys turning into man? Why not instead show a full stop turning into a man?!?!?
Do not be fooled by these so called "high priests" scientists...what they believe is religion..not science.
Science led to computers, cars, and industrial technology.....evolution on the other hand is useless....it's not science at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?