Here is the major hole i found in evolution; its a hole that even top scientists and archeologists who lectured me (some years back) did not know the answer to.
Within archeology, we have the standard ''three-age system'' periodization:
Stone Age
Bronze Age
Iron Age
The so called Stone Age lasted 2. 6 mya - 12, 000 B. P, and it is divided into the Paleolithic, Mesolithic & Neolithic periods. The two latter periods slot into a very narrow recent timeframe compared to the Paleolithic. The Mesolithic began around 20,000 - 15, 000 years ago, while the Neolithic around 12, 000 years ago (though recent findings in Syria have pushed this date back slightly).
During the Paleolithic, there is virtually zero evidence of any significant technological development. All we have is some very crude, primitive stone, bone or wood heads from the age of the Homo Habilus (2. 3 mya) and later from other Hominids. Virtually nothing improved for millions of years, there were only slight changes in the production of the primitive stone or bone weapons and the 'microlith' tool around 70, 000 years ago. You then had some very minor examples of primitive art forms being created around 30,000 B. P (i.e the Venus figures). Earlier alleged Venus figures such as the Venus of Tan-Tan (300, 000 B. P) have been discredited as naturally made (not man made) geofacts. Crude bows and arrows, and nets etc (some minor inventions) were created around 25, 000 B.P. The earliest cave art or petroglyphs also date from the period, although a recent paper in 2008 have challenged this putting the figure down to only around 15, 000 years ago.
The earliest domestication of animals, plants, agricultural, religious paintings, first signs of sedentism, and proper buildings etc only occured all around 15, 000 - 10, 000 years B. P (mostly during the Neolithic revolution). I have dates from compiled science andarcheology papers, hundreds of them, and nothing falls out of place from this figure.
So what does this mean?
1. It means there is virtually no sign whatsoever of cultural evolution or technological progress for millions of years.
2. Man suddenly just just appeared to create agriculture, domesticate animals and create the first communities only around 15, 000 years ago.
Archeologists have long had the problem of explaining this transition and there is more than ten competing theories or hypotheses on this topic (you can look them up under the 'Neolithic Revolution').
My answer to the problems above are that modern man was created around 15, 000 years ago and was not of the same linage as the primitive Hominids or early Hunter Gatherer peoples. Modern man i believe was created as we read in Genesis, as educated, civilized and as a builder.
I believe this is a real solution to the problems face in explaining the transition or revolution of primitive man, to civilized agricultural based settlements.
Within archeology, we have the standard ''three-age system'' periodization:
Stone Age
Bronze Age
Iron Age
The so called Stone Age lasted 2. 6 mya - 12, 000 B. P, and it is divided into the Paleolithic, Mesolithic & Neolithic periods. The two latter periods slot into a very narrow recent timeframe compared to the Paleolithic. The Mesolithic began around 20,000 - 15, 000 years ago, while the Neolithic around 12, 000 years ago (though recent findings in Syria have pushed this date back slightly).
During the Paleolithic, there is virtually zero evidence of any significant technological development. All we have is some very crude, primitive stone, bone or wood heads from the age of the Homo Habilus (2. 3 mya) and later from other Hominids. Virtually nothing improved for millions of years, there were only slight changes in the production of the primitive stone or bone weapons and the 'microlith' tool around 70, 000 years ago. You then had some very minor examples of primitive art forms being created around 30,000 B. P (i.e the Venus figures). Earlier alleged Venus figures such as the Venus of Tan-Tan (300, 000 B. P) have been discredited as naturally made (not man made) geofacts. Crude bows and arrows, and nets etc (some minor inventions) were created around 25, 000 B.P. The earliest cave art or petroglyphs also date from the period, although a recent paper in 2008 have challenged this putting the figure down to only around 15, 000 years ago.
The earliest domestication of animals, plants, agricultural, religious paintings, first signs of sedentism, and proper buildings etc only occured all around 15, 000 - 10, 000 years B. P (mostly during the Neolithic revolution). I have dates from compiled science andarcheology papers, hundreds of them, and nothing falls out of place from this figure.
So what does this mean?
1. It means there is virtually no sign whatsoever of cultural evolution or technological progress for millions of years.
2. Man suddenly just just appeared to create agriculture, domesticate animals and create the first communities only around 15, 000 years ago.
Archeologists have long had the problem of explaining this transition and there is more than ten competing theories or hypotheses on this topic (you can look them up under the 'Neolithic Revolution').
My answer to the problems above are that modern man was created around 15, 000 years ago and was not of the same linage as the primitive Hominids or early Hunter Gatherer peoples. Modern man i believe was created as we read in Genesis, as educated, civilized and as a builder.
I believe this is a real solution to the problems face in explaining the transition or revolution of primitive man, to civilized agricultural based settlements.
