Why doesnt creationism need any data?

[Psudopod]

You do not understand what I said. Give you an example:

Apollo 11 landed on the moon: It is a success of engineering, but according to science, it should not happen. And you can see why. There is no lunar landing after the Apollo project.

You're right, I'm still not following you. What science says moon landings cannot happen.

By the way, a sincere advice to you: do not trust the doctor and do not trust the medicine. The science between them and you could be bad. And there is always alternatives.

You know what they call alternative medicine that has been shown to work? Medicine.

 

[Jazer]

You know what they call alternative medicine that has been shown to work? Medicine.

It's only medicine if the mafia can make money on it.

 

[Psudopod]

Originally Posted by Psudopod

You know what they call alternative medicine that has been shown to work? Medicine.
​

It's only medicine if the mafia can make money on it.

Many generic drugs cost penuts, but they work just as well. And if you're implying that the alternative medicine business is purely in it for the love of helping people then I suggest you look into it a bit closer. There's a lot of money in it.

 

[juvenissun]

You're right, I'm still not following you. What science says moon landings cannot happen.



You know what they call alternative medicine that has been shown to work? Medicine.

You miss read my two points:

Not "cannot happen", but "should not happen" (in scientific sense).
I did not say alternative medicine. I said alternatives.

 

[selfinflikted]

Could you please explain why you think science says "should" not work?

 

[Non sequitur]

Snooky?

I'm sorry.

I'm still coping with that-a-god-exists because of that hard infallible logic

 

[hasone]

You know what they call alternative medicine that has been shown to work? Medicine.

That reminds me of the beat poem "Storm". The delivery of that line by Minchin is perfect.

 

[juvenissun]

Could you please explain why you think science says "should" not work?

For one, science can not predict when or if a solar burst will hit astronauts and killed them.

May be another one, science knows nothing about the accident happened to Apollo 13.

Anyway, if science is perfect, then engineering will be perfect, then there will be no non-human mistake.

 

[Non sequitur]

For one, science can not predict when or if a solar burst will hit astronauts and killed them.

May be another one, science knows nothing about the accident happened to Apollo 13.

An oxygen tank ruptured.

Anyway, if science is perfect, then engineering will be perfect, then there will be no non-human mistake.

This is filled with logical mistakes.

 

[Psudopod]

That reminds me of the beat poem "Storm". The delivery of that line by Minchin is perfect.

Tim Minchin is awesome anyway, but I love Storm. It's one of my favorites.

 

[SkyWriting]

None has ever been presented to support it.

You may not LIKE the data...I don't....but to say "none' has "ever" been published by "anyone" is very easy to prove wrong.

Did you miss my post on how to search online?

The Age of the Earth: Evidence for a Young Earth, Young Earth Evidences.

YOUNG EARTH PROOFS

Is There Evidence for a Young Earth?

 

[SkyWriting]

We can all see how creationism is doing more harm to Christianity than good, if there is a God I don't think creationists are his favorite people.

Not really.
Remember the God we're speaking of is the same one who wrote the book.
Have enough faith that he's not upset at those who trust Him.

Logically, those who do not trust Him would be least favorite.

Don't see it yet?

 

[AV1611VET]

If you don't want to find out the truth because you feel that you might not like the truth then that's a different matter all together.

What's the truth on how we got our moon?

And I don't want theories, I want the truth.

Or, as I suspect, you don't have the truth, either.

Can you sleep at night, not knowing the truth as to how we got our moon?

If so, enjoy the mirror.

 

[AV1611VET]

SkyWriting this supports everything I said, AV1611VET's life is held together with irrelevant nonsense, is yours?
if you're not careful this is how you may end up.

Ya -- these mirrors get heavy after awhile, and I get tired of holding them up.

 

[selfinflikted]

For one, science can not predict when or if a solar burst will hit astronauts and killed them.

Not sure how this, in any way, means that science says astronauts should not be able to go to the moon... ?

May be another one, science knows nothing about the accident happened to Apollo 13.

Huh?

Anyway, if science is perfect, then engineering will be perfect, then there will be no non-human mistake.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[juvenissun]

An oxygen tank ruptured.



This is filled with logical mistakes.

How is that? Is engineering based on sciences?

 

[Split Rock]

Anyway, if science is perfect, then engineering will be perfect, then there will be no non-human mistake.

No human endeavor is perfect. That includes science and biblical interpretation.

You may not LIKE the data...I don't....but to say "none' has "ever" been published by "anyone" is very easy to prove wrong.

Did you miss my post on how to search online?

The Age of the Earth: Evidence for a Young Earth, Young Earth Evidences.

YOUNG EARTH PROOFS

Is There Evidence for a Young Earth?

OK, then how about no legitimate data?

 

[Split Rock]

Not really.
Remember the God we're speaking of is the same one who wrote the book.
Have enough faith that he's not upset at those who trust Him.

Logically, those who do not trust Him would be least favorite.

Don't see it yet?

God didn't write any book. Men wrote the books of The Bible. If God wrote them, there would be no need for Christian Apologetics.

What's the truth on how we got our moon?

And I don't want theories, I want the truth.

Or, as I suspect, you don't have the truth, either.

Can you sleep at night, not knowing the truth as to how we got our moon?

If so, enjoy the mirror.

The theory with the most support right now, is the impact theory. Yes, I sleep fine, not knowing for sure if it is correct. The one that certainly is not correct is the: "God stuck the moon in the firmament as a night light" theory.

 

[Non sequitur]

What's the truth on how we got our moon?

And I don't want theories, I want the truth.

Or, as I suspect, you don't have the truth, either.

Can you sleep at night, not knowing the truth as to how we got our moon?

If so, enjoy the mirror.

Does our eternal existence hang on our theory of how we did?

 

[FrenchyBearpaw]

What's the truth on how we got our moon?

And I don't want theories, I want the truth.

Or, as I suspect, you don't have the truth, either.

Can you sleep at night, not knowing the truth as to how we got our moon?

If so, enjoy the mirror.

Of course I can sleep at night not knowing how we got our moon. What's wrong with saying we don't know yet. Why would you expect someone to make a claim to knowledge without sufficient support? We'll leave the unsupportable claims to religionists.