- May 5, 2017
- 5,611
- 3,999
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Another example of perfect design?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I would not have made its skeleton like this:If you made this creature, how would you have done it?
Another example of perfect design?
![]()
It's easy to criticize someone else's work. It's more difficult to create something of your own. What would you have done instead that would be better? How would you improve the seal?
I've never claimed to be able to 'create' anything. I am told, rather frequently, that God's designs are "perfect."
How would I improve the seal? I never said the seal was 'bad,' I just asked why a seal has legs. Whales, while mammals, do not have legs (and why are their marine mammals in the first place?) - 2 femurs, 2 tibiae, 2 fibulae, 2 coxal bones, etc.. It seems inefficient, sloppy.
I've never claimed to be able to 'create' anything. I am told, rather frequently, that God's designs are "perfect."
How would I improve the seal? I never said the seal was 'bad,' I just asked why a seal has legs. Whales, while mammals, do not have legs (and why are their marine mammals in the first place?) - 2 femurs, 2 tibiae, 2 fibulae, 2 coxal bones, etc.. It seems inefficient, sloppy.
Or perhaps you have a rationale for having a pair of otherwise normal lower limbs fused together?If it seems "sloppy" or "inefficient" then you must have some standard in your mind of what a perfect seal would be like. Just because it "seems" sloppy to you does not mean it's actually sloppy. You just don't like it for some reason.
Haven't you seen a seal swim?
Superb form.
Dinosaurs must have been suboptimal...Hmmm... 15 mil year run? sounds like a pretty solid design to me.
Or perhaps you have a rationale for having a pair of otherwise normal lower limbs fused together?
I was asked in another thread, in effect, if I was so smart how would i have designed the eye without a blind spot. I had a rather simple answer. The response I got was along the lines of 'well why don't you make and eye then'.
My 'answer' to the seal 'design' is that it is not designed - it is much better understood as a result of evolutionary processes than 'design.'
Were I the designer of life, first of all there would have been no seals to try to achieve, so I wouldn't have designed a seal at all. Nor whales - why consign an air breathing creature to life in the middle of the ocean when fish are far better adapted to such an environment.
Not so hard as it is to be condescending. In fact, that seems pretty easy. I am not disappointed at all. In fact, I find acknowledging the ultimate success of evolution in the extant creatures we see to be very heartening and joyous.Is it hard to be so disappointed with the world that you live in?
Seals are par excellence in water...it's almost like they were "made for it".![]()
So no answer to why it has legs (leg bones)?
As expected.
I get that you cannot answer my question. Thanks.
Another example of perfect design?
![]()