- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
With claims of science, belief is not supposed to be involved.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
With claims of science, belief is not supposed to be involved.People usually present all their opinions as fact, and some feel that "Majority Rule" is more "factual" than others.
Other than sinners, logically, who would ever say something they didn't believe?
It is not my point of view but God's. I merely echo it. Since science cannot prove that either the past was not different or that it was the same state....they lose in all ways.
Why don't you tell us His point of view then?Correction - it is not God's point of view, but just what you have been told his point of view is.
Correction, Jesus is God and He made it crystal clear His words and Scripture were absolutely true to the nth degree.Correction - it is not God's point of view, but just what you have been told his point of view is. Since God has not appeared to you to explain it first hand, all you can do is hope that the messenger has delivered an accurate message.
With claims of science, belief is not supposed to be involved.
I only claim what the plasma physicists claim. It is the cosmologists that make the claims not backed by laboratory experiments - that in fact treat plasma exactly the opposite of your next statement.
As for plasma in deep space I see this
"An astrophysical plasma is a plasma (an ionized gas) the physical properties of which are studied as part of astrophysics. Much of the baryonic matter of the universe is thought to consist of plasma, a state of matter in which atoms and molecules are so hot, that they have ionized by breaking up into their constituent parts, negatively charged electrons and positively charged ions. Because the particles are charged, they are strongly influenced by electromagnetic forces, that is, by magnetic and electric fields."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_plasma
On earth, yes we do know that time and space and physics exist. However, have you any proof that the magnetic, electrical, and other forces exist there and affect plasma as you claim?? Let's see what you got.
As for your link supposedly showing how plasma is the same in deep space I see you spammed a Russian video of some cosmonauts in space over earth. Very funny.
You believe that physics as we know it will exist billions of years from now and that the universe will go dark. Basically it doesn't matter what scientists believe. Knowledge matters.Why do creationist always want to equivocate on the meanings of "belief?"
"I believe in God."
"Scientists believe the data show that birds evolved from dinosaurs."
"I believe I'll have another Guinness."
These, they would have us um, believe, all mean the same thing.
Your retreat to 'laboratory experiments' shows you believe that the whole universe is as here.I only claim what the plasma physicists claim. It is the cosmologists that make the claims not backed by laboratory experiments - that in fact treat plasma exactly the opposite of your next statement.
They do what you do...assume that the far universe is the same as here. They apparently interpret the data to mean something other than what you do.So then ask them why they are treating plasma at 2 million K like a neutral gas - refusing to accept what that says and postulating Fairie Dust dark matter instead?
Your article talked about gravity and magnetism in distant galaxies. One has to know the size and distance to the galaxy to be able to read what is happening there. You don't. You can't. The ways cosmology determines distance and size have been shown to have a fatal error. Unless time exists in the far universe no sizes or distances can be known. All the methods to determine distance involve time existing there as here.I got all of science - what do you think they detect out there?
Those Russians are the only ones ever to do an experiment in actual space with plasma - and lo and behold - it behaved differently than any of the experts thought it would. American or otherwise. Yet they refuse to change their views about plasma - just like you - imagine that.
You believe that physics as we know it will exist billions of years from now
So you do not believe science now?? Where do you stand??I do? (Barbarian checks) Nope. Your imagination working overtime, again.
It is about false prophests and false prophesy. 100%And on the 'universe going dark' stuff, it might be useful for you to learn a little math and physics, and then come back and tell us about it when you have the means to understand what it's about.
You can't do math on the unknown.If I've misjudged you, kindly show us the math on expansion, so we can see that you actually know something about it.
So you do not believe science now??
You do realize that physics is involved?
You can't do math on the unknown.
Doesn't matter. Name what they think? You think they do not also assume physics will hold in the future? Guess the root in the word 'physicist'?!Perhaps you don't know what "science" means.
"In tens of billions of years - a relatively short time in cosmological terms - physicists claim the universe will soon stop expanding and collapse on itself, obliterating all matter as we know it."
I know physicists who don't think so. In fact, most of them seem to not think so.
Dark stuff is invented baloney.Barbarian suggests:
And on the 'universe going dark' stuff, it might be useful for you to learn a little math and physics, and then come back and tell us about it when you have the means to understand what it's about.
Barbarian suggests:
If I've misjudged you, kindly show us the math on expansion, so we can see that you actually know something about it.
I do.If you don't know the arguments for, or even against, cosmology, what makes you think you can comment rationally about it?
Please provide the evidence you have to support this assertion.... the universe rotates around the earth.
Thus we have a geocentric earth that looks heliocentric.
Don't got none.Please provide the evidence you have to support this assertion.
What would you do if you met Jesus on the road?Because I'm not afraid to do that.
I'll even ask an atheist a theist question.
And better yet, I'm not afraid to ask a scientist a question about Genesis 1.
In fact, I have a whole slew of challenge threads for the educated elite that is worth reading, just to show how elusive some can get.I understand
I don't care to share my personal information either.
I appreciate your honesty.
And for the record, I call those who use the scientific method to avoid answering my simple questions: "scientific methodists."
And for those who do answer them -- if ever -- I consider them "scientific methodists" as well.
AV1611VET said:But theuniverse rotates around the earth.
Thus we have a geocentric earth that looks heliocentric.
ecco said:Please provide the evidence you have to support this assertion.
Don't got none.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?