• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why does Paul never mention any of the specific details about the life of Jesus?

Sketcher

Born Imperishable
Feb 23, 2004
39,044
9,489
✟421,138.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Paul experienced meeting Jesus in a very different way than the other Apostles did. He met the risen and glorified Jesus on the Damascus Road. Subsequently, he received teaching from the Lord via revelation in the Arabian desert. This is entirely different from the others, who knew Him in real life, who were present at His sermons and miracles, who ate and drank with Him. The fact that Paul's gospel and their gospel matches up perfectly is rather extraordinary. Given that each of the Apostles taught according to their experience while guided and inspired by the Holy Spirit, it doesn't really surprise me we don't see biographical information about Jesus from Paul.
 
Upvote 0

heron

Legend
Mar 24, 2005
19,443
962
✟41,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Most of Paul's writings were letters to churches that he mentored. They were never intended to be part of scriptures.

"Say hi to Priscilla," "we can't wait to see you," "the Christians from Italy say hi," "Timothy is out of jail" ... these are not words of someone who expected to sum up the gospel in its entirety.

(1Th 3:6, Hebrews 13:23-24; II Tim 4:19)

Most of his letters were reasoning with people about their varied approach to their faith. Paul probably would have considered it heretical at the time, that his letters to people would be considered the Word of God.
 
Upvote 0

OldChurchGuy

Regular Member
Feb 19, 2007
195
24
✟23,252.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Most of Paul's writings were letters to churches that he mentored. They were never intended to be part of scriptures.

"Say hi to Priscilla," "we can't wait to see you," "the Christians from Italy say hi," "Timothy is out of jail" ... these are not words of someone who expected to sum up the gospel in its entirety.

(1Th 3:6, Hebrews 13:23-24; II Tim 4:19)

Most of his letters were reasoning with people about their varied approach to their faith. Paul probably would have considered it heretical at the time, that his letters to people would be considered the Word of God.

A most interesting understanding of Paul's writings. You make a very good point and one that, to me anyway, is worth considering.

Thanks for sharing it.

OldChurchGuy
 
Upvote 0

heron

Legend
Mar 24, 2005
19,443
962
✟41,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
There is the Paul Stuff and then there is this as well...
1. "No contemporaries wrote about him."
[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]
In the post, Josephus is mentioned as living shortly after Jesus. This military leader and historian Flavius Josephus wrote on Jesus' impact in Jerusalem.

[SIZE=-1] [Jesus] [wise man] [surprising][deeds] [teacher] [truth before God][/SIZE] [SIZE=-1][many people] [he was indicted] [by leaders] [of us] [sentenced to cross] [those who had him] [spending the third day] [he appeared to them] [prophets] [these things] [and numerous other things] [about him][/SIZE]
http://members.aol.com/fljosephus/contAn1.htm

Remember also that the temple was destroyed shortly after, so some documents were destroyed.

See also some later writings.
Justin, First Apology 31 (c. 140 AD/CE)
Ignatius, To the Trallians 9 (c. 120 AD/CE)

2. No astronomical event corresponding to the star of Bethlehem.

Look up the work of Michael R. Molnar -- he has an article on the NASA site.
http://scicolloq.gsfc.nasa.gov/Molnar.htm


In 3-2 BC, there was a series of seven conjunctions, including three between Jupiter and Regulus and a strikingly close conjunction between Jupiter and Venus on June 17, 2 BC."

The fusion of two planets would have been a rare and awe-inspiring event," according to an influential paper by Roger Sinnott.

Firmicus Maternus, an astrologer to Roman Emperor Constantine, wrote that an occultation of Jupiter in Aries was a sign of the birth of a divine king.

When the royal star of Zeus, the planet Jupiter, was in the east this was the most powerful time to confer kingships. Furthermore, the Sun was in Aries where it is exalted. And the Moon was in very close conjunction with Jupiter in Aries.
This set of conditions reoccurs every sixty years.

There was even an ancient coin from Antioch that showed the alignment of the stars.
http://home.eclipse.net/~molnar/
...endorsed by Prof. Bradley E. Schaefer, Yale University[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
ARIES.GIF


Another article on NASA--
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/24may_duo.htm

"Close encounters between Jupiter and Venus happen often enough, every year or so. Some, though, are better than others. For instance, on June 17, 2 B.C., the pair drew so near -- just 6 arcseconds (0.002 deg.) apart -- that they merged into a single dazzling point of light. Some scholars believe that was the Star of Bethlehem mentioned in the Bible."

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast16may_1.htm?list, about
The Star of Bethlehem: An Astronomical and Historical Perspective," Susan S. Carroll

On June 17, 2 BC, Venus and Jupiter joined .... in the constellation Leo. The two planets were at best 6” (arcseconds) apart; some calculations indicate that they actually overlapped each other. This conjunction occurred during the evening and would have appeared as one very bright star. Even if they were 6” apart, it would have required the sharpest of eyes to split the two, because of their brightness.


See also
spacer.gif
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/961217b.html -

http://search.nasa.gov/search/searc...tion&oe=UTF-8&proxystylesheet=nasa_production
 
Upvote 0