Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It said to go and kill the Amalekites. They were singled out because of who they were, being Amalekites.
In another section of the Bible priests were sacrificed on altars because they belonged to a specific religion which is again genocide.
So what is the purpose of killing infants?
God does stop evil, and this is that process.
Kill them because they have human sacrifices. To show them that it is wrong, use their priests as human sacrifices. It would seem to me that the only difference between the Chosen People and the civilizations they were told to conquer is that the Hebrews won (supposedly). It would appear that winning the war makes you moral.
That's what I've been saying. This is the Tl;Dr format
How many people would these Priests sacrifice upon the altar during their lives? Killing that Priest is akin to shooting a would-be mass shooter before he can take his next victim. At Sandy Hook this judgment would have been most welcome, and by all except Adam Lanza. Why are you against it now?
How many people would these Priests sacrifice upon the altar during their lives?
Is that immoral? If their god ordered it, then that god's purpose is stopping evil which makes human sacrifices moral, does it not?
No sir, I already snipped out for you the relevant part of the text you're willfully skipping over, so you couldn't miss it. You can see WHY God intended for them to die, and that has nothing to do their tribe; instead it is judgment for action.
What we are left with is God judges us, and it sux to be in that position.
No it does not. That god's purpose was creating evil, sacrificing their infants in the fire.
A judgement for action against a nation, and that punishment called for the wiping out the entire nation including innocent infants. That is immoral. That is genocide.
If the Amalek god says that you must sacrifice a human to prevent evil, who are you to say otherwise? Isn't that moral?
Then the purpose of the God in the Bible is likewise the creation of evil by visiting genocide on children.
You base your decision upon paper thin non-arguments, and not having information. Don't let me stop you, but it is not a recommended way of arriving at good decisions.
So you support Molach by being pro-abortion. Same thing. Same god. Same barbarism, different day.
So we see in these passages you bring up, a moral dilemma that for God to put a stop to evil (the thread title) He must create evil.
This is reasoning for us to REPENT.
No, he doesn't. That's the whole point. God is omnipotent. God doesn't have to resort to genocide to prevent evil.
Let's do this. If a god orders his followers to visit genocide on another population, we deem that this god is evil. If this god commands his people to sacrifice the priests of a competing religion on their own altars we should conclude that this god is evil.
Anytime you want to stop just making stuff up and deal with reality, let us know.
Its always nice to broad brush with generalities rather than dealing with all those messy details, isn't it?
The only make believe I see are those who claim that an omnipotent deity is so limited in power that he has to make his followers do his bidding and commit genocide.
It's called an objective morality. Heard of it? Or do you follow moral relativism?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?