T
Thekla
Guest
I agree that Mary was certainly 'highly favoured' by God for the purpose of bearing Jesus but that is about it.
From what we read in the Gospels it seems that Mary was at best tolerated by Jesus where it seems that she had quickly forgotten that the child Jesus was the Son of God; she could probably be defined as being someone who in her youth had experienced a very powerful work of God but who in later years seems to have forgotten what God has done, where they return to the world with its concerns.
I can't say I see what you interpret in the Scriptures, though I have read others make similar claims.
In more recent years, when I consider the amount of blasphemous teachings that have been built around her over the centuries; which I deem to be an insult to her name, I have wondered if God has allowed the many heresies within Mariolatry due to Mary maybe turning her back on the Lord in her later years. Even though this is only a supposition on my part, this is about the only way that I can see why the Lord would have allowed Mary's name to be disgraced in the manner that it has. When Mary stands before the Lord along with the rest of us in the day of Judgment, she will be undoubtedly grieved to hear for the first time of the many heresies that have been attributed to her name.
Interesting; I've seen many teachings misinterpreted and labelled heretical and no doubt some hold heretical opinions about Mary, but then heretical opinions have also been promulgated re: the very person of Jesus Christ.
Even though Mary was in her early days highly favoured by the Lord due to her role in the birth process with Jesus, history has sadly been very unkind to her where he name has been blackened by the many heresies within Mariolatry.
There are all manner of "olotries" about Christ, the Father, the Holy Spirit, the Saints of the NT, and any number of other things. It is a shame (including how many I've met who cannot stand the name of Jesus because of what Christians have said to them ... )
Upvote
0