Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Assuming you're correct; perhaps Skarl could have been a little more accurate with his word choices, eh?I don't think Skarl meant that there were were not any scientists that were creationists.
You must be talking about some man made theory of creationism. Because real Science uses the Bible all the time as a standard of truth to guide and lead them into all truth. If their Science does not line up with the Bible then sooner or later that Science will fail and be falsified. Any carpenter can tell you that there is a standard you have to follow when your are building. The more you get away from the standard the more you are at risk for failure.[/list]
no creationist or group of creationists, scientists or not, have ever presented any original research to a scientific journal about creationism.
Bzzzz.
"What is...NOT Christian Science, Alex?"
"We were looking for Science, but our judges will accept your answer. Please select the next category."
One more time. "Creation Science" is not "any science that happens to have been done by a scientist who at the time he began his research believed the Genesis creation story to be to some degree or another literally true." And that is the only thing that these achievements have in common with a belief in Creationism.Really? then where did the following come from?
As well as:
- Antiseptic Surgery
- Bacteriology
- Calculus
- Celestial Mechanics
- Chemistry
- Comparative Anatomy
- Computer Science
- Dimensional Analysis
- Dynamics
- Electrodynamics
- Electromagnetics
- Electronics
- Energetics
- Entomology of Living Insects
- Field Theory
- Fluid Mechanics
- Galactic Astronomy
- Gas Dynamics
- Genetics
- Glacial Geology
- Gynecology
- Hydraulics
- Hydrography
- Hydrostatics
- Ichthyology
- Isotopic Chemistry
- Model Analysis
- Natural History
- Non-Euclidean Geometry
- Oceanography
- Optical Mineralogy
- Paleontology
- Pathology
- Physical Astronomy
- Reversible Thermodynamics
- Statistical Thermodynamics
- Stratigraphy
- Systematic Biology
- Thermodynamics
- Thermokinetics
- Vertebrate Paleontology
- Absolute Temperature Scale
- Actuarial Tables
- Barometer
- Biogenesis Law
- Calculating Machine
- Chloroform
- Classification System
- Double Stars
- Electric Generator
- Electric Motor
- Ephemeris Tables
- Fermentation Control
- Galvanometer
- Global Star Catalog
- Inert Gas
- Kaleidoscope
- Law of Gravity
- Mine Safety Lamp
- Pasteurization
- Reflecting Telescope
- Scientific Method
- Self-Induction
- Telegraph
- Thermionic Valve
- Trans-Atlantic Cable
- Vaccination & Immunization
If their Science does not line up with the Bible then sooner or later that Science will fail and be falsified.
One more time. "Creation Science" is not "any science that happens to have been done by a scientist who at the time he began his research believed the Genesis creation story to be to some degree or another literally true." And that is the only thing that these achievements have in common with a belief in Creationism.
And yet again, he said ...One more time. "Creation Science"...
Do you see the difference?"creation scientists"
And yet again, he said ...
Do you see the difference?
But he was a scientist who believed in creation; and that's all that counts.Newton was not a "Creation" scientist.
I'm quite sure that Newton didn't consider his belief in God a false belief.Yes, we did. Newton was not a "Creation" scientist. He may have believed in creationism, but he also had many other false beliefs. That does not affect his work in basic physics. Newton was a physicist and a mathematician.
But he was a scientist who believed in creation; and that's all that counts.
Yes, it does matter what he believed. If we're addressing the fact that there are scientists who 1) believed in creation, and 2) made these contributions I posted, then I've made my point.Two points. One, no, it does not matter what he believed.
He could have been Muslim, and my point still stands. He was a creationist, and a scientist who made contributions to the scientific world.Second. I would not be too sure that he even believed in creation. Do you have evidence that he believed so? There is some controversy about his Christianity, and that was in a time where belief was mandatory.
But he was a scientist who believed in creation; and that's all that counts.
Perhaps it just reveals the meaning of evolution to already be confusing?Why does the "15 Questions for Evolutionists" brochure from Creation.com confuse the meaning of "evolution"?
Maybe they aren't afraid to put what they know or don't know up in the storefront window for you guys' perusal?Why would a Young Earth Creationist ministry wish to expose their "science knowledge" in this way?
So? are they obligated to?Most of the questions deal with topics which have nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution.
Why what?Why?
Is what 'scientific ignorance'?Is it scientific ignorance?
Is what 'dishonesty'?Or dishonesty?
Is what a 'very shrewd propaganda technique'?Very shrewd propaganda technique?
Can you do better?
I'm not a fan of the brochure, per se; but I'm anti-evolution.Are there any anti-evolution people here who are fans of the "15 Questions" brochure?
Beats me.Do you consider the brochure honest and accurate?
I'm not a fan of the brochure, per se; but I'm anti-evolution.
Absolutely! One such example is, "Were you there?"Is there such a thing as a dishonest or inaccurate question?
I'm not a fan of the brochure, per se; but I'm anti-evolution.
We'll just call it 'adaptation,' then.Since you believe in micro-evolution, that means you are an Evolutionist!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?