Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The woo is strong with this one.
the fossil record is full of such examples.Very interesting... do you have any specific examples of this occurring?
Dear Paul, Adam was made the 3rd Day/Age before the plants and herbs GREW according to Gen 2:4-7. Amen? My woo is supported by God's Holy Word and you can dismiss His Truth as "woo" if you want, but it is God's Truth until you refute it. God Bless you
Soooo...which skull transitioned into what skull?
That we cannot say for certain which is ancestral to which and which are merely side shows does not mean it isn't evidence for evolution, it is evidence for evolution.
It is all you can reasonably ask for fossil evidence to give you, and since we have all you can reasonably ask for fossil evidence to give you, it is unreasonable for you to dismiss it.
Guesses and suppositions which are transitional and which are not?
They are all transitional, from earlier species to modern Homo Sapiens.
If you don't understand that now, when I have seen people explain it to you already, I have to conclude that you are being willfully ignorant.
Guesses and suppositions which are transitional and which are not?
i believe "nature" did exactly that when it published a graph of the primate fossil tree.
the position of the found fossils can lead to any conlusion you wish to make.
in other words there aren't enough fossils to come to any conclusion.
that's exactly right.
why wouldn't you believe "nature" when it says we only have 3.8% of the required fossils?
again correct.
the information i posted above comes from those people.
believe what?
"nature"?
i have no reason to doubt it.
Let me ask again. Are you claiming that the first skull transitioned into the last skull?
All are transitional in the sense that they show there were actual forms intermediate between chimps and humans in every possible degree. Some of them were probably "cousins" instead of "direct lineage" but on the other hand others have not yet been discovered. Its a good enough display to show that evolution is compatible with the fossil records, considering we cannot have every animal that ever lived in our fossils.
Human Family Tree Now a Tangled, Messy Bush
Was it a yes or no?
i understand fossils are important historical specimens.Fossils are only one piece of evidence for the TOE. But they are certainly a meaningful piece.
Again, fossils are only one piece of evidence for the TOE. Again, they are a meaningful piece.
Do you understand that?
i understand fossils are important historical specimens.
the record however does not support gradual change.
i have the graph on my hard drive.
looking at that graph with an open mind will lead you to any conclusion you wish to make.
i don't see how they can say we came from apes or an alligator.
there's even speculation that each form had an original beginning.
this means once it's gone, it's gone, there's no "re-evolving".
what's your answer to this?
No.
Do you understand that those are all considered transitional fossils, from early ancestors through to Homo Sapiens?
1. Could you please link/post the graph.
2. Who published the graph?
3. Is this information from a peer-reviewed paper? If so, could I please have the title of the paper and the journal or ? it was published in.
4. How does the graph show we could have evolved from alligators just as easily as from apes.
Thanks.
1. Could you please link/post the graph.
2. Who published the graph?
3. Is this information from a peer-reviewed paper? If so, could I please have the title of the paper and the journal or ? it was published in.
4. How does the graph show we could have evolved from alligators just as easily as from apes.
Thanks.
this site doesn't support file uploads.1. Could you please link/post the graph.
the british journal "nature"2. Who published the graph?
sure.3. Is this information from a peer-reviewed paper? If so, could I please have the title of the paper and the journal or ? it was published in.
it means you can't draw ANY conclusions from it.4. How does the graph show we could have evolved from alligators just as easily as from apes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?