Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because you've been mischaracterizing my posts and arguing with me about them.
Good for you, I guess? My point still stands though.
When they are just doing their job?
Well it seems I come across examples of this everyday...just crossed another one.
WATCH: ICE Sued After Videos Capture Pastor Shot With ‘Chemical Pellets’ at Peaceful Protest
I bet that pastor was attacking them or someth....
https://www.reddit.com/r/illinois/s/09n0juVcj3
If there are people having trouble understanding why people dislike how iCE is doing their work, I'm hoping folks will be willing to share some examples. I'll do my bit when I can.
Strange. Because Obamas numbers were actually quite high. So that doesn't make senseI suspect some of the antipathy towards ICE is the shock of actual enforcement of immigration law by ICE, especially in cities where for many years or decades ICE enforcement was so negligible as to be invisible and unheard of in those cities.
Hmmm. I wonder if it was morning how they managed to carry out thwir activities then. In as much as they were never noticed but did their work without trying to intimidate and scare. Because there are certainly stats of neighbouring counties that show there was ice activity over the last few decades.Indeed, LA County Mayor said ICE “was not present” and “was not present for so long.” They simply were accustomed to minimal to invisible existence of ICE for a long time.
So the bolded supports my position, “neighboring counties” doesn’t reveal anything of other counties.Hmmm. I wonder if it was morning how they managed to carry out thwir activities then. In as much as they were never noticed but did their work without trying to intimidate and scare. Because there are certainly stats of neighbouring counties that show there was ice activity over the last few decades.
Strange. Because Obamas numbers were actually quite high. So that doesn't make sense
Strange. Because Obamas numbers were actually quite high. So that doesn't make sense
Is it though?(Biden's admin is another story)
This theory falls apart in the light of the above data. It comes down to rhetoric and the methods employed by ICE.At the risk of sounding cynical...
I think the superficial answer is the accurate one on this.
An old white guy (perceived as having racist views on extraneous issues) deporting non-white people elicits a different reaction from some folks than if a younger non-white guy (perceived to have more progressive values) deports non-white people.
Were abuses of power and unprofessional conduct from agents happening during the raids and round-ups that happened under Obama? Almost certainly. But they would've been much less visible, as the prevalence of the "HD video recording device in everyone's pocket" was much lower back then, so you didn't have a hundred people standing around filming every interaction and uploading it to where millions of people could see it.
Is it though?
View attachment 371592
A heck of a lot more people were deported under Biden than under Obama (or Trump).
This theory falls apart in the light of the above data. It comes down to rhetoric and the methods employed by ICE.
You're welcome to show evidence of that.So the bolded supports my position, “neighboring counties” doesn’t reveal anything of other counties.
^^^^Has absolutely not germane to my comment of, “I suspect some of the antipathy towards ICE is the shock of actual enforcement of immigration law by ICE, especially in cities where for many years or decades ICE enforcement was so negligible as to be invisible and unheard of in those cities.”
I’ll proceed now and address your faulty assumption by stating Obama’s “numbers were actually quite high” can logically co-exist with my statement “I suspect some of the antipathy towards ICE is the shock of actual enforcement of immigration law by ICE, especially in cities where for many years or decades ICE enforcement was so negligible as to be invisible and unheard of in those cities.”
Obama’s “quite high” numbers aren’t contradictory to my bolded statement, neither are the two inconsistent.
Make comment makes perfect sense when one comprehends Obama’s “quite high” numbers weren’t predominantly and/or substantially from specific areas. It’s your confusing high numbers and by bolded comments as mutually exclusive “that doesn’t make sense.”
"almost certainly" he says....with 0 evidence.Were abuses of power and unprofessional conduct from agents happening during the raids and round-ups that happened under Obama? Almost certainly. But they would've been much less visible, as the prevalence of the "HD video recording device in everyone's pocket" was much lower back then, so you didn't have a hundred people standing around filming every interaction and uploading it to where millions of people could see it.
If there wasn't, that would make the ICE agency under Obama literally only law enforcement agency in the country that didn't have cases of abuse of power or complaints about aggressive behavior."almost certainly" he says....with 0 evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?