Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's right, EastCoast, God gave us a brain. And on account of that, we have highly educated scientists who well know how to interpret bones.
Let me ask the anti-evolution posters a question.
What if....you were proven without a doubt that evolution is true....and this earth is really really......old. How would that affect your christian faith? Would you retain it? Or would evolution being true destroy the belief in the Christian God in your mind?
I think i know some key ideas. Its because it undermines the creation story and that people will become irreligious?
Well wouldnt that be an issue about the idea of the earth is flat if the bible is literal on that part i mean?
What i mean is that science explains our physicial world. The main point i am making is that Creation Story had two interpretations in medieval ages. Allegory" basically a deeper meaning than it is. Or "Literally" like just like it is written.
So basically allegory seems to be the key point then. Since that can be used. Since God is outside our understanding. Science is a method just to understand the world we live in more or less.
So i dont see the problem with evolution, because it doesnt undermine the scripture in the sense of it not being true?
Although i do believe its a shame that more people who lack understanding go away because of ignorance and just dont bother trying to understand why Christianity is a religion to help your life.
But i am curious to what you think?
....and this earth is really really......old. How would that affect your christian faith?
The real reason why real Christian will not accept evolution is the same reason you accept it.
Meet footprints found in Poland almost 6 years ago.Meet tiktaalik,
Meet microraptor,
? why should I have to show "life created itself"? Life certainly appeared, somehow, we can't deny that, and once life appeared, evolution started happening.
Species never observed coming into existence? What, in your eyes, would actually constitute observation of species coming into existence? I realize you can continue to deny, deny, deny in spite of the evidence. I merely need to point that out for our readers.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html
Dude....just stop. You and other anti-evolution posters are going against the rules of this forum by attacking the person's character and their Christian faith of those that disagree with you.
Im sure you would not want someone telling you that you no nothing of the mind of Christ.
So when we go to church, we don't spend a lot of time discussing evolution, I'll grant you that. But if we are interested in God's world, we might choose to read up on what scientists have found out, and there's nothing wrong with doing that. It is wrong, however, mischaracterize their work, say nonsense about what scientists claim and refuse correction on that nonsense, and to declare their solid findings to be false.
They're non existent.NO, Extraneous, this transitional fossils are not nonsense.
More handwaving and goal post shifting.You sound like one of those pharmaceutical ads on TV where they list one marginal benefit for their product and then disclose the potential life threatening side effects....lol
Seriously, the best you can come up with for a beneficial chromosomal defect is one that has a marginal effect on malaria?
Here's from the CDC
Here's the supposed benefit for being blessed by this defect...
You're not making a good case for your theory...
You've been directly linked to hundreds. At this point you can claim that subjectively you don't believe they aren't transitional fossils, but to suggest in any way that they don't exist objectively is, frankly, dishonest.They're non existent.
Extinction.You've been directly linked to hundreds. At this point you can claim that subjectively you don't believe they aren't transitional fossils, but to suggest in any way that they don't exist objectively is, frankly, dishonest.
It's all there at the website I linked you to earlier. Thank you for confirming you didn't read it, as I was sure you wouldn't.Please share some evidence, any evidence, that show us one domain, one kingdom, one phylum, one class, on order, one family, one genus that transformed into another.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?