Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Science and Religion
The Catholic Church has always taught that "no real disagreement can exist between the theologian and the scientist provided each keeps within his own limits. . . . If nevertheless there is a disagreement . . . it should be remembered that the sacred writers, or more truly ‘the Spirit of God who spoke through them, did not wish to teach men such truths (as the inner structure of visible objects) which do not help anyone to salvation’; and that, for this reason, rather than trying to provide a scientific exposition of nature, they sometimes describe and treat these matters either in a somewhat figurative language or as the common manner of speech those times required, and indeed still requires nowadays in everyday life, even amongst most learned people" (Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus 18).
God's Word Is COMPLETELY true
All scientific things are below God...
Where it gets dangerous is if you try to integrate evolutionary theory with God's word.
Saying in absolute terms "GOD did it this way", it would be safer to remain silent I think. We must be careful what we attribute to God.
I think the safer answer would be
"There is SOME truth behind the science of evolution, that science is part of God's creation, but to what extent I dare not venture to attribute to God, for God knows his creation perfectly and we humans are better off believing in What He says, rather than believing in what someone else says."
Science is a helpful tool, just keep it a tool and Make God your ultimate focus!
Indeed.
Indeed....X2.
It's also telling that anyone who calls him out for his hypocritical actions, ignorant statements, and general lack of knowledge about a subject he is trying to "debate" is labeled a "stalker".
the difference is... God said 6 days.You know - the same could be said about 6 day creationism. Saying in absolute terms "GOD did it this way", it would be safer to remain silent I think. We must be careful what we attribute to God.
You know - the same could be said about 6 day creationism. Saying in absolute terms "GOD did it this way", it would be safer to remain silent I think. We must be careful what we attribute to God.
oh....snap, lol
if you desire some one to post gently , not get personal,not say to others thing that insinuate its about you or offended you....
then its a good idea to post gently,not get personal,not say to others thing that insinuate its about them or offended them...
-we learn as we go.
What I desire is for some one to post without judging another person's salvation or their Christian beliefs, twisting their words, or "rebuking" them because they don't interpret the bible the same way they do or make them angry.
What I desire is for some one to take personal responsibility for their actions and not blame other posters for their inane outbursts.
What I desire is to not get called a stalker when I reply negatively to some one's posts because they believe and are acting like they are God's appointed judge and jury.
Disagreeing with a person's viewpoint is completely different than what "some one" is doing....and it's apparent that I'm not the only one who notices that.
Agreed, I don't know why some Christians believe that Jesus must believe everything in Genesis happened exactly the way it did just because he made references to it.
To copy and paste a quote from myself from another topic when it comes to this situation,
"Yes Jesus made references to Genesis to make some point, but that does not mean that the Genesis then HAS to be historically correct.
Understand it this way......
I could say this......
"The Road to revenge is a dark path that would ultimately lead to your doom, as what happened to Ahab when he chased the white whale and eventually fell upon its body. So remember, do not end up like the madman Ahab, forgive your enemies and walk away from conflict that could harm you."
Now I am referencing a story and character, that are not historically accurate (its a work of fiction).
Though when I was using said references to make a point, I remained neutral on whether or not this story was historical truth.
Now if you had the opinion that "Moby Dick" was a history book, then you may have the idea that my references to "Moby Dick", and the fact that I did not say, "By the way Ahab and the White Whale are not real characters", come to the conclusion that my references prove (and that I believed) that everything written down in "Moby Dick" happened.
So all im trying to say is that there is more then just one interpretation (Jesus references Genesis, specifically Adam and Eve and the Flood, well that means it HAS to be historical truth) to the references that Jesus said."
Please be honest.
Jesus never said "Adam and Eve are literal".
Jesus quoted Genesis making reference to A&E. The difference is important.
When I quote the Boy who Cried Wolf - I'm not implying he is literal. Please confirm you understand the difference. I elaborated this in my post earlier which has gone unaddressed.
What I desire is for some one to post without judging another person's salvation or their Christian beliefs, twisting their words, or "rebuking" them because they don't interpret the bible the same way they do or make them angry.
What I desire is for some one to take personal responsibility for their actions and not blame other posters for their inane outbursts.
What I desire is to not get called a stalker when I reply negatively to some one's posts because they believe and are acting like they are God's appointed judge and jury.
Disagreeing with a person's viewpoint is completely different than what "some one" is doing....and it's apparent that I'm not the only one who notices that.
if you desire some one to post gently , not get personal,not say to others thing that insinuate its about you or offended you....
then its a good idea to post gently,not get personal,not say to others thing that insinuate its about them or offended them...
-we learn as we go.
Except its safe to say that God created the world in 6 days. That is what we know for sure.
However, there might be some details left out. Details like perhaps(guesses for the sake of showing that full ET or Old Earth might not be entirely contradictory to the bible) time dilation/shift, evolution introduced after the fall in both directions of time, time variations speed increase, decrease. secret things of God. etc.
We know that God didn't have men living to be nearly a thousand years old at some point in time.
Did he simply adjust the telomeres so that men wouldn't live as long? Perhaps a time adjustment? Maybe this stuff will be revealed in heaven.
What was the author of genesis relating days to? was it to rotation of the earth? when it became night and day? Was the earth spinning faster or slower? I think you can see where I am going with this.
This shows a fundamental ignorance of both Scripture and sound theology. Jesus IS God! He is the Word that was with God and was God as explained by John. He became flesh (Jesus) to die for us. Therefore any reference He makes to creation is from the perspective of the one who was there!
In the post you quoted for this response That poster was not saying that Jesus is not God at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?