Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Interesting that you take your beliefs from those who murdered Jesus. I find that extremely odd, as it is a devil inspired belief because it is the devil who is a murderer.Carrying a mat is work. Its basically moving his furniture and that was not allowed, as Jews reminded to the man.
Jesus was not stating anything against the Word of God . No text said that a man who had been healed could not pick his mat/rug and blanket - and walk home. Jesus knew that but the Pharisees were very keen to 'make stuff up' then charge God with it - as if God was behind whatever traditions they came up with.This is what the Lord says: Be careful not to carry a load on the Sabbath day or bring it through the gates of Jerusalem. Do not bring a load out of your houses or do any work on the Sabbath, but keep the Sabbath day holy, as I commanded your ancestors.
Jer 17:21 (NIV)
Then Jesus said to him, “Get up! Pick up your mat and walk.” At once the man was cured; he picked up his mat and walked.
The day on which this took place was a Sabbath, and so the Jewish leaders said to the man who had been healed, “It is the Sabbath; the law forbids you to carry your mat.”
But he replied, “The man who made me well said to me, ‘Pick up your mat and walk.’ ”
J 5:8-11 (NIV)
"...they tried all the more to kill him [Jesus]; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God"
J 5:18 (NIV)
The carrying of the mat was not necessary for the healing or walking.
'All' laws are a matter of judgement if they are not specifically outlined by the law, and Jesus made His call and Judgement on that Sabbath day concerning the interpretation of 'their' unwritten law. I dont know if there was a specific law against preparing a body (we may not even know since it was oral law) it is more likely an interpretation of the Sabbath law. The Pharisees chose their interpretation above Jesus' and that was their prerogative. Allbeit, as we learn later that Jesus being The Law giver Himself overrides their Judgement of this interpretation of the Sabbat Law.Was this also a ridiculous interpretation?
Then they went home and prepared spices and perfumes. But they rested on the Sabbath in obedience to the commandment.
Lk 23:56
If the preparing of a dead body for a proper burial was not allowed, why would a public carrying of a bed across the city be allowed?
This is a logical fallacy.Interesting that you take your beliefs from those who murdered Jesus. I find that extremely odd, as it is a devil inspired belief because it is the devil who is a murderer.
You are also focusing just on "was it against the Mosaic Law" instead of on the question "why did Jesus gave this instruction".Jesus was not stating anything against the Word of God . No text said that a man who had been healed could not pick his mat/rug and blanket - and walk home. Jesus knew that but the Pharisees were very keen to 'make stuff up' then charge God with it - as if God was behind whatever traditions they came up with.
No wonder in Mark 7:7-13 Christ condemned those traditions "handed down" that were being passed off as if it was God speaking
The Mosaic Law said "you will do no work" or "you will not carry any load" and many other similar instructions through the Old Testament.Again, the Pharisees were voicing an 'interpretation' of the law - not quoting the Sabbath Law itself
You are welcome to quote him. The only His commentary in this context about sin is:Jesus said it wasn't a sin therefore it was not work.
2895 krábbatos – a small bed used by the poorA mat is not a piece of furniture nor is it a mattress.
You're using a modern definition of mattress and applying it to ancient times which is not the same.2895 krábbatos – a small bed used by the poor
Usage: a bed, mattress
You're adding the sin was picking up the mattress when Jesus never said that.You are welcome to quote him. The only His commentary in this context about sin is:
Later Jesus found him at the temple and said to him, “See, you are well again. Stop sinning or something worse may happen to you.”
J 5:14
Anyway, you are also getting off-topic. This thread is about "why".
Adding to what? I do not recall using the term sin. Try to focus on what is actually being written and not on straw man arguments.You're adding the sin was picking up the mattress when Jesus never said that.
I do not think I am using any modern definitions, here.You're using a modern definition of mattress and applying it to ancient times which is not the same.
That was just one among many corrupted things they did.According to the Jesus of the Bible, the Pharisees who were accusing Jesus of Sin, were "Teaching for Doctrines the Commandments of men" and were "Transgressing God's commandments by their own religious tradition".
God's Sabbath for which He rested in satisfaction was now incarnate as man - Jesus.You can find this biblical Truth in Matt. 15, Mark 7, Matt. 23. and elsewhere, should you be interested. Would it not be prudent then, to consider that perhaps the Pharisees sabbath traditions, and God's Sabbath commandment, were not the same?
You have to go beyond the beginning understanding of resting on the 7th day.Would it not be True then, that Jesus didn't disobey or dishonor His Father, who HE says is the One True God, by Breaking God's Sabbath, rather, HE refused to walk in or abide by the Pharisees Sabbath Tradition?
He went out of His way to do as I discribed above. He manifested that He Himself was the image and expression of God.So then, is it possible that Jesus didn't break even the Least of His Father Commandments, and teach others to do the same?
That was just one among many corrupted things they did.
God's Sabbath for which He rested in satisfaction was now incarnate as man - Jesus.
Jesus turned them away from everything to have them see all God commanded and needed was in Him - the Son of God.
And He was about to dispense Himself into man after accomplishing an eternal redemption.
You have to go beyond the beginning understanding of resting on the 7th day.
God created man in His image to express Him and for dominion to rule for Him.
Who totally expressed God's glory to the uttermost? Jesus the Son of God.
Who exercised the authority of God to defeat all that is in rebellion to God? Jesus the Son of God.
So in the Son the Father had full rest and satisfaction. The Sabbath had become incarnated as a man.
And behold, a voice out of the heavens, saying, This is My Son, the Beloved, in whom I have found My delight. (Matt. 3:17)
Come to Me all who toil and are burdened, and I will give you rest.
Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
For My yoke is easy and My burden is light. (Matt. 11:28-30))
He went out of His way to do as I discribed above. He manifested that He Himself was the image and expression of God.
And He Himself by living by the Father within Him exercised God's dominion over everything in creation.
If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; and henceforth you know Him and have seen Him. (John 14;7)
And the men marveled, saying, What kind of man is this that even the winds and the sea obey Him? (Matt. 8:27)
Jesus came as the greater Jonah. He came as the greater David. He came as something greater than the temple.
And He came as the greater 7th day Sabbath.
And He further comes into man "to dispense His life and nature into man".
1. I do not take beliefs from themAnd what is the fallacy?
So is Christ in Mark 7:7-13 - have you read it?You are also focusing just on "was it against the Mosaic Law"
Already answered it - Jesus did NOT give any instruction at all against Law.instead of on the question "why did Jesus gave this instruction".
Good point. In fact -- irrefutable.According to the Jesus of the Bible, the Pharisees who were accusing Jesus of Sin, were "Teaching for Doctrines the Commandments of men" and were "Transgressing God's commandments by their own religious tradition". You can find this biblical Truth in Matt. 15, Mark 7, Matt. 23. and elsewhere, should you be interested. Would it not be prudent then, to consider that perhaps the Pharisees sabbath traditions, and God's Sabbath commandment, were not the same?
yep - that is what we see in places like Mark 7:7-13 when God's Word is in direct conflict with the traditions and commandments of menHE refused to walk in or abide by the Pharisees Sabbath Tradition?
Maybe there is a Pharisee around today to make up such a law and the blame God for it. The someone else can come along and ask why God is commanding a woman to break His Law...In your religion, was it against God's Sabbath Law for a woman to carry her child out of her house, into the Gates of Jerusalem on God's Sabbath?
good pointMatt. 5: 19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Wouldn't the popular religious philosophy that Jesus Broke His Father's Sabbath Commandment, and taught the healed man to do the same, make Jesus the same as the Pharisees?
You're not saying what logical fallacy I used.1. I do not take beliefs from them
2. Evil deeds do not mean that everything they taught or said (even decades before Jesus) is a lie/wrong
3. When devil is a murderer and somebody else is also a murderer, it does not follow that devil also inspired him in a different area
4. Not all Pharisees or teachers of the Law who were contemporaries of Jesus murdered Jesus or were evil, for example Nicodemus or Gamaliel.
My goodness, Bob, focus. Why did Jesus gave the instruction to the man to take his mat and walk through the city with it, when it was not allowed to do on Sabbath?So is Christ in Mark 7:7-13 - have you read it?
Note the title of this thread - if you would like second reason for such a focus on this particular thread.
Already answered it - Jesus did NOT give any instruction at all against Law.
And in Matt 5 He condemns the idea that people would accuse Him of such a thing.
17 “Do not presume that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. 18 For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke of a letter shall pass from the Law, until all is accomplished! 19 Therefore, whoever nullifies one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least" Matt 5
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?