Why are there no cows in the Devonian?

[Mr Strawberry]

All right. I explain it to you in plain English:.

Writing in 'plain English' demands a certain facility with the English language. You have never shown evidence of possessing that facility. Indeed, I believe English is your second language, and a poor second at that. Therefore starting your post by claiming you were going to write in "plain English" was doomed to failure, and you didn't disappoint.

 

[anyathesword]

I don't understand why you can't see the problem.



Then why can't we find their fossils? Why can't we find a single mammal, bird, reptile, species of grass, or flower in Devonian deposits?



The fossils and sediments found on the Earth were there in the past, and we can use them to reconstruct the past.

And you think Evolutionists are constructing their past very well??!!!!
As I search, I read alot of words such as "appearing" and coming into existance just like this without any traces of intermediate fossils, fishes "exploding" in the Devonian period, then again they "diversified rapidly again in the Mesozoic to Cenozoic, 120 to 60 million years ago on the timeline"
(Read more at The Fish Explosion - Creation RevolutionCreation Revolution). The second Age of fishes!!!!
"a new paper in PNAS that tried to paper over a “lack of a single comprehensive phylogeny” that “has limited our understanding of the evolution and diversification of this radiation” of our finny friends (Near et al., “Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification,” PNAS August 6, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206625109).
Read more at The Fish Explosion - Creation RevolutionCreation Revolution

I mean common!! Theories, explanations just keep changing!!! Dain, where have their heads gone? Oops we found these new fossils, but wait a sec, they are older, but ressemble our present day species! What happened?!! Wait a minute, there's another fish explosion!! The fish just exploded out of nowhere twice!!!! Wow, unbelievable!!

Here is a chart to show the difference between the evolution thought and the creation thought on the Sydney Area of Australia (I don't know why I can't post pictures):

http://biblicalgeology.net/images/stories/field_guides/comparison-lg.jpg

 

[Mr Strawberry]

And you think Evolutionists are constructing their past very well??!!!!
As I search, I read alot of words such as "appearing" and coming into existance just like this without any traces of intermediate fossils, fishes "exploding" in the Devonian period, then again they "diversified rapidly again in the Mesozoic to Cenozoic, 120 to 60 million years ago on the timeline"
(Read more at The Fish Explosion - Creation RevolutionCreation Revolution). The second Age of fishes!!!!
"a new paper in PNAS that tried to paper over a “lack of a single comprehensive phylogeny” that “has limited our understanding of the evolution and diversification of this radiation” of our finny friends (Near et al., “Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification,” PNAS August 6, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206625109).
Read more at The Fish Explosion - Creation RevolutionCreation Revolution

I mean common!! Theories, explanations just keep changing!!! Dain, where have their heads gone? Oops we found these new fossils, but wait a sec, they are older, but ressemble our present day species! What happened?!! Wait a minute, there's another fish explosion!! The fish just exploded out of nowhere twice!!!! Wow, unbelievable!!

Here is a chart to show the difference between the evolution thought and the creation thought on the Sydney Area of Australia (I don't know why I can't post pictures):

http://biblicalgeology.net/images/stories/field_guides/comparison-lg.jpg

Oh for goodness' sake, stop reading creationist sources and start reading the real science. You'll find it much more demanding and not as much fun (initially) but the results will be far more rewarding.

 

[anyathesword]

Oh for goodness' sake, stop reading creationist sources and start reading the real science. You'll find it much more demanding and not as much fun (initially) but the results will be far more rewarding.

Oh for goodness sake stop reading evolution sources and start reading the Truth! Evolution is not real science. Science uses the scientific method.

Theories and hypothesis are subject to change all the time, must be repeated, etc. That's what science is, it's not about finding our origins, which is just like a myth, a historical narrative!!!!

By the way I read both sites to get better understanding. My research is very rewarding by the way

 

[Mr Strawberry]

Oh for goodness sake stop reading evolution sources and start reading the Truth! Evolution is not real science. Science uses the scientific method.

Theories and hypothesis are subject to change all the time, must be repeated, etc. That's what science is, it's not about finding our origins, which is just like a myth, a historical narrative!!!!

By the way I read both sites to get better understanding. My research is very rewarding by the way

Rewarding in this sense doesn't mean quick thrills on the internet, which is what you are getting. When I was a young teenager I used to love those crazy magazines about UFOs and the paranormal and all the rest of it. But then one day you see through it and realise none of it is true. Then you become more interested in what is actually known and how people actually know it. How did they find out? Can we verify what they found out? etc.

I'm afraid until you tire of the stuff that promises you so much but gives you almost nothing of substance, you will just find yourself endlessly sifting through handfuls of loose sand.

 

[Black Akuma]

Theories and hypothesis are subject to change all the time, must be repeated, etc.

Evolution is perfectly repeatable. You can see it happening all the time.

 

[Aman777]

Evolution is perfectly repeatable. You can see it happening all the time.

Dear Black Akuma, Where do you go to see Apes changing into Humans? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[anyathesword]

Evolution is perfectly repeatable. You can see it happening all the time.

Really? where?

 

[anyathesword]

Rewarding in this sense doesn't mean quick thrills on the internet, which is what you are getting. When I was a young teenager I used to love those crazy magazines about UFOs and the paranormal and all the rest of it. But then one day you see through it and realise none of it is true. Then you become more interested in what is actually known and how people actually know it. How did they find out? Can we verify what they found out? etc.

I'm afraid until you tire of the stuff that promises you so much but gives you almost nothing of substance, you will just find yourself endlessly sifting through handfuls of loose sand.

What promises does the stuff give me?

I am not getting thrills, I am Learning more and evolution is starting to be quite funny now.

 

[Black Akuma]

Really? where?

We can observe evolution in organisms. A classic example are nylon-eating bacteria.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

What promises does the stuff give me?

A critical faculty for one thing. Which you clearly haven't got at the moment.

I am not getting thrills

If you say so, but most of us have been through that stage and know what it's all about.

, I am Learning more and evolution is starting to be quite funny now.

Then evidently then you are not reading real science, as evolution is one of the most substantiated theories in all of science. But if you are doing so much research, presumably if you switched off your computer right now and sat with a pen and a pad of A4 you would have no trouble writing 1000 words explaining the major evidence supporting evolution.

 

[Delphiki]

Dear Black Akuma, Where do you go to see Apes changing into Humans? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

We don't because humans are apes.

That's like asking where we see dogs change into poodles.

 

[anyathesword]

We don't because humans are apes.

That's like asking where we see dogs change into poodles.

Lol, dogs are poodles..

And humans have been humans since a while now, lol. Actually since the 6th day of creation!

 

[Aman777]

Originally Posted by Aman777

Dear Black Akuma, Where do you go to see Apes changing into Humans? God Bless you.

We don't because humans are apes.

That's like asking where we see dogs change into poodles.

Dear Delphiki, That is the LIE of the ToE. Evols have been falsely teaching this incomplete, untrue, Theory, that Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes, for more than 50 years. How old were you when you were brain washed to believe that you were nothing more than an animal? Such LIES are bringing Armageddon closer and closer. God Bless you, and help you to overcome the burden put upon you as a child.

In Love,
Aman
​

 

[Delphiki]

Lol, dogs are poodles..

Congratulations. You've understood the analogy.

And humans have been humans since a while now, lol. Actually since the 6th day of creation!

Poodles are poodles for a while now, lol. Actually since humans bred them that way through artificial selection.


Humans are a kind of ape. Poodles are a kind of dog. Good. Now you're ready to put the square peg into the square hole.

 

[pgp_protector]

Lol, dogs are poodles..

And humans have been humans since a while now, lol. Actually since the 6th day of creation!

Actually poodles are dogs, but not all dogs are poodles.

 

[anyathesword]

A critical faculty for one thing. Which you clearly haven't got at the moment.

If you say so, but most of us have been through that stage and know what it's all about.

Then evidently then you are not reading real science, as evolution is one of the most substantiated theories in all of science. But if you are doing so much research, presumably if you switched off your computer right now and sat with a pen and a pad of A4 you would have no trouble writing 1000 words explaining the major evidence supporting evolution.

A critical faculty and what kind of answer is that? I asked you what promises does 'the stuff' give me.

I think I'd have huge trouble writing down the evidence supporting evolution because nothing is observed in the past and the scientific method is not used properly.

I can however write a huge paper on everythingI'v learned so far in January on evolution and creationism.

 

[anyathesword]

Congratulations. You've understood the analogy.





Poodles are poodles for a while now, lol. Actually since humans bred them that way through artificial selection.


Humans are a kind of ape. Poodles are a kind of dog. Good. Now you're ready to put the square peg into the square hole.

Ok, dogs are dogs, humans are humans, frogs are frogs, fish are fish, birds are birds.

So did apes breed themselves through artificial selection to make us and then after give us intelligence?

 

[CabVet]

I think I'd have huge trouble writing down the evidence supporting evolution because nothing is observed in the past and the scientific method is not used properly.

Do you think it is impossible to know who committed a crime if there were no reliable witnesses and no video-tape? Tell me in two or three sentences what do you think the scientific method is.

I can however write a huge paper on everythingI'v learned so far in January on evolution and creationism.

I would be interested to know what you learned about evolution. But please try to be brief.

 

[Aman777]

We can observe evolution in organisms. A classic example are nylon-eating bacteria.

Dear Black Akuma, You can observe changes in genetics in populations over time or changes within His kinds (common ancestors) in ANY creature which came forth from the water on the 5th Day Genesis 1:21 or 3.7 Billion years ago in man's time. Can you tell us HOW ancient men who lived 3k years ago knew that?

Of course not. It's proof of God. God also tells us that Humans did NOT evolve from any other living creature. Genesis 2:-7 God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman