EternalDragon
Counselor
It has. I've just read about it in what evidence they do have in formulating what the extinction events were. Siberian Traps? Increases Co2? Decreased oxygen? Emeishan Traps in China? Global warming?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I said this once and will repeat, if anything like that would have ever happened, at any time in the past, it would have left (literally) mountains of evidence. Your link presents none, zero, zilch, nada.
Are you a scientist? Do you understand a little bit math language? Or am I talking to a wrong person and has to go to a lower level?
Ad hominem, you use it every time you lose an argument. It's becoming a pattern.
It has. I've just read about it in what evidence they do have in formulating what the extinction events were. Siberian Traps? Increases Co2? Decreased oxygen? Emeishan Traps in China? Global warming?
You had your chance of learning. Bye.
It has. I've just read about it in what evidence they do have in formulating what the extinction events were. Siberian Traps? Increases Co2? Decreased oxygen? Emeishan Traps in China? Global warming?
Increased CO2 and Decreased oxygen suggests hotter temperatures, not more water.
You must have missed the part about runaway subduction raising the ocean floor up. There is the same amount of water here now as there was prior to the flood. Although some has remained frozen near the poles.
If you saw the earth prior to the flood, you'd probably be surprised.
Did the story of Purim do the opposite?Noah's flood is one of those biblical stories that made atheism appeal to me.
Did the story of Purim do the opposite?
Or does your belief system only flow one way?
Again, that doesn't surprise me one bit.Not familiar with that one.
EstherWhat book and chapter is that?
Again, that doesn't surprise me one bit.
Esther
(Be careful reading it though, according to your logic, you might get saved.)
You did pretty good agreeing on the negative parts:Sorry, it has been a few years since I read the bible, and it was a bit of a forced read.
But the positive parts suddenly give you amnesia, don't they?Same, along with God ordering the killing men, women and children of conquered cities, but sparing virgins.
Yeah,
You did pretty good on the negative parts:
But the positive parts suddenly give you amnesia, don't they?
Why?Don't know why I would believe in god because of a story from the only book in the bible that never uses the word god.
You did pretty good agreeing on the negative parts:
But the positive parts suddenly give you amnesia, don't they?
Why?
The Flood story can help make you an atheist; but the Purim story from the same Book can't help make you a believer?
You know ... in a lab, I would guess they would call that "balance;" but since it came from the Bible, it's an "inconsistency," isn't it?No, it's not the positive parts that give me amnesia, it is the inconsistency that does. There are plenty of nice stories in the Bible, the sermon of the mount being one of the nicest. But there are many horrible ones too.
You know ... in a lab, I would guess they would call that "balance;" but since it came from the Bible, it's an "inconsistency," isn't it?
Ecclesiastes 3:3 A time to kill, and a time to heal;
To a scientist, this is an "inconsistency," isn't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?