Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They most assuredly are not in agreement. That a foetus is human, certainly. That it is a human being? Absolutely different kettle of fish.Nah dude. The philosophers and scientists are in agreement on at least this point. A fetus is certainly a human being. Just like someone in a vegetative state is a human being.
I am a nurse and a woman who works on a women's floor at a major hospital. Every decision we make for a woman who is pregnant is based on what is best for the health of BOTH PATIENTS. This is including all stages of gestation including early pregnancy.
I believe the right to choose ends at conception. In most cases, there were plenty of opportunities to make choices up until that point. In the rare occasion that the pregnancy was the result of force, carrying a baby to birth still a "curable" condition and the baby can be offered to someone who will care for it. If the choice gets down to truly being a dangerous pregnancy for the mother, then I will always say "save the mother" but most of the time this is used because the pregnancy is an inconvenience and not a danger. Even then, most mothers pick their babies lives over theirs when asked to choose...and convincing them to make decisions that does otherwise are often difficult.
I have held babies born at 24 weeks. They are every bit as human as babies born at 40 weeks. Before that, they aren't usually viable outside the womb but a few years ago, neither were babies born at 24 weeks.
Pregnancy is a curable medical condition...and it never last longer than approximately nine months.
I have cared for an 18 year old patient who had a medical abortion (done at a proper medical clinic) and she spent several days in ICU and almost died from this "choice". I was in the room when the doctor was discussing the possibility of maybe needing a hysterectomy. She was one month out of high school. Abortions are not "safe" alternatives to pregnancy. Birth control or abstinence is.
I don't think the abortion debate is a case of special pleading.
Capital punishment, self defence and war are exceptions to the rule of "intentional killing = bad". These exceptions have to be justified. (Don't derail...those justifications belong in a different thread).
However, the default position is "intentional killing = bad", for the reasons Tree of Life gave in his OP. So the onus is on you to provide a justification as to why abortion is a special exception.
They most assuredly are not in agreement. That a foetus is human, certainly. That it is a human being? Absolutely different kettle of fish.
Please demonstrate how.I apparently was not clear. trying to exclude an egg and sperm from the argument was a case of special pleading, not the abortion argument in general.
You don't think there's such a thing as future human experiences?
Fair enough. How many of those woman that you talked to expressed feelings of grief or remorse for what they did?
I don't think you get the argument. If you'll allow me to walk you through it, we'll start at square one.Three things:
1. The qualifier "valuable" has no place in the argument, as it's not demonstrable or quantifiable.
2. It's not possible to guarantee any future for the fetus.
2. We don't allow or disallow actions based on possible futures. We don't incarcerate people based on the possibility that they'll commit a crime. We incarcerate people after they've committed a crime.
Without higher brain functions, a fetus isn't a person. and potentiality is meaningless.
I want to add that IF we take the stance that abortion is immoral, we also need to develop an attitude of compassion for the woman who is pregnant out of wedlock. She needs to be loved and supported and not shamed. That is how we show Christ's love to these very vulnerable women. (Seldom do the fathers of these pregnancy suffer the same shame.)
since you believe that only people who are able to "appreciate and fear the concept of death" have a right to live please stay away from young children and people in hospitals and nursing homes ok ...Flawed premise at 2. Killing a NAHB is "wrong" at least partly because a NAHB is a sentient being who can appreciate and fear the concept of death. A VHF is not. Potential is not actuality. Acorns aren't oak trees.
Please demonstrate how.
... and mentally disabled people who live outside of institutionssince you believe that only people who are able to "appreciate and fear the concept of death" have a right to live please stay away from young children and people in hospitals and nursing homes ok ...
Exactly so.What's the difference between a human and a human being? Something like personhood? Yeah. That's the real question. "Is a fetus a person?"
since you believe that only people who are able to "appreciate and fear the concept of death" have a right to live please stay away from young children and people in hospitals and nursing homes ok ...
The argument rests on the premise that to deprive a potential future experience is immoral. You then attempt to exclude sperm and egg from the argument because they "do not have their own unique DNA". This is irrelevant because it is simply drawing an arbitrary distinction at the moment of conception. All sperm and eggs have as much of a chance of forming together and becoming a zygote. Why is it immoral to deprive this possible future from a zygote that has just formed but not immoral for the sperm and egg that it just came from a few seconds previously? Your explanation offers no reason too differentiate except the passage of a couple of seconds. Ergo, special pleading.
A fetus is certainly a human being.Exactly so.
The argument rests on the premise that to deprive a potential future experience is immoral. You then attempt to exclude sperm and egg from the argument because they "do not have their own unique DNA". This is irrelevant because it is simply drawing an arbitrary distinction at the moment of conception. All sperm and eggs have as much of a chance of forming together and becoming a zygote. Why is it immoral to deprive this possible future from a zygote that has just formed but not immoral for the sperm and egg that it just came from a few seconds previously? Your explanation offers no reason too differentiate except the passage of a couple of seconds. Ergo, special pleading.
Then your definition of "human being " is different to how I understand the term.A fetus is certainly a human being.
A fetus is probably not a person.
But personhood doesn't really matter in the question of whether or not abortion is immoral. Marquis' argument does not depend on whether or not a fetus is a person.
I don't think you get the argument. If you'll allow me to walk you through it, we'll start at square one.
Do you think that it's wrong to kill a normal adult human being? By normal, I mean one that is not liable to death via war, capital punishment, self defense. One who is not mentally ill or having a terminal illness. Those issues obviously complicate things and it's possible that it may not be wrong to kill in those circumstances. But a normal, adult human being. Don't you think it's wrong to kill one of them?
yes we know you dont consider human beings as people who have a right to live unless they have a certain degree of intelligence , very dangerous thinking indeed , and a direct result of legalized abortion on our culture . next will be the argument that mentally disabled people are not really people with rights in fact some like yourself have already determined that they are not people because of their lack of intelligence a dangerous road we travel on here.Exactly so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?