Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well I can't speak for anyone else but I'm not gay, just one of "those" Christians.
tulc(Mrs.tulc will vouch for me, honest!)
My brother, I will gladly always share my coffee with you!
tulc(a fellow brother of the bean?)
[SIZE=-1]In a nutshell: I would like for you, and DMagoh, and MercyBurst, and Der Alter, and NewGuy101, etc. to cut the "we love the sinner and hate the sin" cowpies and come out say what you really THINK, which I believe is going to be be (though this may not apply to you, per se): We hate gays, and we believe God hates gays, and we hate the gay people on this board -- and they're doomed and damned and frankly, we're glad!. . .[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] "Persecuting" poor, long-suffering fundamentalists (who condemn others without mercy, but are also the first to complain when others turn around and condemn them for doing the very same things fundies condemn others for doing*)?
(You know -- that Romans 2:1-4 thingie, of which I have yet to hear a fundamentalist ever say might apply to them. Just for grins, I've included it, below:
1 Therefore you are without excuse, O man, whoever you are who judge. For in that which you judge another, you condemn yourself.For you who judge practice the same things. 2 We know that the judgment of God is according to truth against those who practice such things. 3 Do you think this, O man who judges those who practice such things, and do the same, that you will escape the judgment of God? 4 Or do you despise the riches of his goodness, forbearance, and patience, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?
I know, I know:
13. If your opponent quotes the Bible tell him you're not impressed: even the Devil can quote scripture.)[/size]
I'm gay and a meteorologist. I have access to the National Weather Service's Doppler radars and direct access to the National Weather Service so they can issue warnings.
Who would you want to warn you: a gay or a straight meteorologist?
No tornado's here..but I'd have to get my warning from a gay meteorologist simply becauset our ABC/CBS/NBC and FOX weathermen are all gay. Two of them I know. LOL. Wonder if there is something behind that? hmmm....
Come to think of it, the meterologist on the most watched local news channel here (the NBC affiliate) is also gay. He is the first person I see when bad weather is predicted because they have the best storm coverage.
see what I'm saying....also, a friend of mine is a weather man in a Boston affiliate...he's also gay. I'm in the NYC area..so I know our weathermen are gay. Not only do I see them out..but common knowledge for years! Now even the weatherman on FOX is gay...and we all know how conservative that network is....
Hey Uber... I wouldn't mind a response, I'm truly curious.Well, as horrible as it was, it was kinda loaded, don't you think?
I dare say your perspective would be different if you were burning. but that would go both ways, wouldn't it!
Hypothetical... do you think it would be possible to get along with someone who DOES think homosexuality is a sin? Jus' wonderin'.
Ah, you Texicans don't count.
Another question.... do you believe someone who holds fundamentalist beliefs can be less than the horrible monsters you portray fundamentalists to be?
Interesting, I find the ones who "pervert" the scriptures are the ones that have falsely translated out 1 Cor 6:9.Context, context, context! I am not a practicing homosexual, I do NOT practice and do the same thing.
I am not in the judging business. I interpret and exegete scripture and point out how others corrupt and pervert those scriptures.
For you who judge practice the same things. 2 We know that the judgment of God is according to truth against those who practice such things. 3 Do you think this, O man who judges those who practice such things, and do the same, that you will escape the judgment of God?
You didn't ask for my response, but I feel the need to speak anyway...so please allow me to....Hey Uber... I wouldn't mind a response, I'm truly curious.
no worries. Open forum!You didn't ask for my response, but I feel the need to speak anyway...so please allow me to....
If you'll pardon the pun, there is a fundamental misunderstanding of Fundamentalism. It IS supposed to be about this:UIC said:I don't believe fundamentalist as monsters only because I do believe they do not see how they come across to others. I am not an extreme person in anyway...and that includes faith. The fundamentalist faith sets up a lsit of requirements that need to be met in order to have a life with Christ. At the same time, they, as a whole, have zero tolerence of anyone that does not believe as they do.
you sure about that? And how do we decide then, what is literal, and what is not? Could not, using the argument that it does not all have to be literal, it be said that even Christ is metaphorical or allegorical, and not literal? The bible does include both allegory and metaphor, however, historically speaking, I believe it as literal.UIC said:Most fundamentalists are literalists as well which excludes the majority of Christians.
Most Christians, worldwide, are not literalists except with the core beliefs of christianity...the trinity, the virgin birth, the crucifixion, and the resurrection.
ah, yes... the "holy huddle. Disassociation completely from the world as a whole. I can't say that I agree with that. How can you reach the lost, if you are only with the saved? It makes little sense to me.UIC said:Fundamentalists is a lifestyle more than a faith. They congregate near each other, they do everything christian..from music, to vacations, to wknd encounters, etc...Again, NOTHING wrong with that but it goes beyond faith and becomes obsession..hence the term "fundamentalist".
true. Which is why despite holding what could be called "Fundamentalist beliefs" I will not identify with Fundamentalism. It isn't fundamentalism, it's extremism.UIC said:By any defintion it's a term used to define a "militant orthadox". But islam after it, put christian after it, it's all the same..It's hardcore...it's extreme..it's not representative of the majority...and it's dangerous. Those sorta terms, embraced by fundamentalists themselves, can easily be confused with what thinks of when they hear the term "monster". There have been many a hateful thing that fundamentalists do. For starters would be those that protest funerals of strangers saying "God Kills [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth]" or "AIDS is God's way of curing homosexuality" etc.. Perhaps you don't do that...BUT those that represent your extreme faith do.
fair enough.UIC said:That's Christian like? I'd say it is more "monster" than "God like". I can go on and on and on...but will stop since I wasn't even asked to comment to begin with... I will say this though. We have two couples in our church that USED to be fundamentalists. They truly never thought there was anything wrong with their belief structure b/c they were surrounded by it in the community in Texas. They knew no other sort of way to practice their fatih. When they got transferred here to the northeast they came to our church b/c it was close to them. They totally were blown outta the water with it. Very uncomfortable..but guess what? they are now members. Why? B/c they couldn't believe how they pushed so many christians away when Christianity is ALL about welcoming/embracing/etc.. They don't agree with alot of stuff, BUT that is their reason for coming to our church. They want to learn, meet, and be around people that are different than them in order to learn. They are RARE when it comes to fundamentalists. I do believe those that are NOT fundies are much more willing to embrace them, than a fundie is to embrace someone outside of their comfort zone.
You got that right my friend. I'm in a book club right now reading "Heart of Christianity"...truly is the best book I ever read b/c it does give accurate and true representation of christianity today. They do NOT use terms like fundamentalism b/c many liberals FUNDAMENTALLY BELIEVE in the foundation of Christianity...however, you would never call them Fundamentalists b/c the term has been taken to represent the extreme and disturbing postions of Christianity. Anyway, if you haven't read it..pick it up. Short book, easy to read, and point on!no worries. Open forum!
If you'll pardon the pun, there is a fundamental misunderstanding of Fundamentalism. It IS supposed to be about this:
fun·da·men·tal·ism
1. a movement in American Protestantism that arose in the early part of the 20th century in reaction to modernism and that stresses the infallibility of the Bible not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record, holding as essential to Christian faith belief in such doctrines as the creation of the world, the virgin birth, physical resurrection, atonement by the sacrificial death of Christ, and the Second Coming.
but it became a platform for hatred.
That is correct. Fundamentalism is a relatively contemporary belief. Prior to the Enlightenment Era, when science began to prove many things in the Bible incorrect, there was no "literal" of the Bible. It was what it was. However, it was then that some people would not accept the science, and thus, became literalist...they did not want to rock their beliefs, so basically shut the facts out of their faith. Fundamentalist, by definition, is NOT a bad thing..it basically is what many people hold dear to them...they believe in core concepts, etc.. However, the reality of the situation is you are right...when it comes to FAITH, the term has been hijacked by extremists, and as such, has turned a great many people away from Christianity..including those that were Christians themselves. You know there is an issue here simply because if you call someone a "fundamentalist" and they're not...they will be offended, insulted, and be angered. ONLY if you are one, and called one, will you embrace it...and even those sometimes hesitate to tell you "they are one". Just ask yourself...if someone said "are you a "baptist" or a "catholic" or a "episcopal" etc...and you weren't, you'd say no biggie really. Ask if someone is a "fundamentalists"...and their not, your response will be less than friendly I'm sure. Also, if someone said to you "i'm a fundamentalist"...what do you think? For me..."hey, nice to meet you" and then exit.
you sure about that? And how do we decide then, what is literal, and what is not? Could not, using the argument that it does not all have to be literal, it be said that even Christ is metaphorical or allegorical, and not literal?
Great point. Yes..I believe in the core beliefs of Christianity as literal. It is the foundation of the faith. God is VERY metaphoric as the writings show you. THAT is the reason the book is still being sold thousands of years after it's time. The writing represents methaphorical writing and allegorical writing at it's best. God spoke MESSAGES!!! God had MEANING in his words. When Jesus came to us..he came to us in human form because he was human. Just being human everyone reads and writes based on their perceptions. So while the bible is important to me, and I love reading it...it is a book, and not my God. I do not pray to it as many here seem to do. To take it literally is to not take it for what it's message is.
The bible does include both allegory and metaphor, however, historically speaking, I believe it as literal. ah, yes... the "holy huddle. Disassociation completely from the world as a whole. I can't say that I agree with that. How can you reach the lost, if you are only with the saved? It makes little sense to me.
And what is important here is that many are NOT lost simply b/c they are not fundamentalists. Fundamentalsists hold much hate, and yet they think they have the hold on Christianity. God does not hate, and they give the devil too much credit. Humankind make their own path and are quite capable of doing evil things on their own witih no intervention from "satan". I believe in evil very much so. I do not believe in a "lucifer" or "satan"...Fundamentalists give evil a "name" to make it sound as if some outside influence is responsible for the evil things they do. Sorry...as humans..we are more than capable of being evil on our own.
true. Which is why despite holding what could be called "Fundamentalist beliefs" I will not identify with Fundamentalism. It isn't fundamentalism, it's extremism.
fair enough.
I'll look it up!You got that right my friend. I'm in a book club right now reading "Heart of Christianity"...truly is the best book I ever read b/c it does give accurate and true representation of christianity today. They do NOT use terms like fundamentalism b/c many liberals FUNDAMENTALLY BELIEVE in the foundation of Christianity...however, you would never call them Fundamentalists b/c the term has been taken to represent the extreme and disturbing postions of Christianity. Anyway, if you haven't read it..pick it up. Short book, easy to read, and point on!
Interesting, I find the ones who "pervert" the scriptures are the ones that have falsely translated out 1 Cor 6:9
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders... (1 Cor. 6:9, NIV)
[SIZE=-1]Interesting, I find the ones who "pervert" the scriptures are the ones that have falsely translated out 1 Cor 6:9.
"One cannot be absolutely certain that the two key words in I Corinthians 6:9 are meant as references to male homosexual behavior." -- Victor Paul Furnish, a Professor of New Testament from Perkins School of Theology, Dallas.
http://home.wanadoo.nl/inspiritus/The%20Mystery.htm[/SIZE]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?